I have received a number of
letters this week that start with “I’m sorry about what Harold said about you
Apparently, you think my belief that the forces of Order cannot win
within this time cycle is despair. Au contraire. The belief in struggle that cannot be won is
at the heart of Aryan virtue and the ideal of warrior asceticism. The belief that there is something to win –
or that winning is important – is the materialist cowardice you have been
railing against. No one who wants to win
is going to join you – because the odds of anyone benefiting by joining you are
small – death or imprisonment is more likely.
What you are seeking is people willing to sacrifice whether they win or
not – and that is the spirit you’re missing.
In the Bhagavad-Gita, when Arjuna looks at the army of his kinsmen that is
arrayed against him, he does not want to fight – he does not want to slay his
relatives or be slain by them. So, Krishna
speaks to Arjuna and says: “I am Time,
the Great Destroyer. All of those you
see arrayed against you are mine, and will die even if you bear no arms. So go
forward amidst them into slaughter, and become the instrument of my will.”
This set of verses reveals the
great truth about life in this world. It
is the same lesson embodied the spirit of Islamic jihad. In Islam, there are two jihads –
al-jihadul-akbar and al-jihadul-ashgar – the Greater and Lesser Holy War. The Lesser Holy War is the war fought in the
material world to bring the infidel into submission to Allah – to grow and
expand the dominion of the Islamic ethno-cultural organism. The Greater Holy War is the war fought to
bring one’s soul into submission to Allah, by bearing the pain and suffering of
war without losing faith. In Islam,
jihad is thus Allah’s way of testing and purifying his believers. After all, as an all-powerful God, Allah
could bring all of the world into submission by an act of will. Instead, Allah allows the infidel to exist
and, at times, dominate the faithful, in order to test the inner quality of the
The same doctrine drove the Viking
warrior into battle, promising his soul direct access to Valhalla. In the Nordic culture, the value of the man
was in the ordstirr, the judgment of Odin, sometimes called “the fame of a dead
man’s deeds.” By uniting the warrior
with his Valkyrie – his spirit of victory – battle led the warrior to the
conquest of death – and to eternal life in Odin’s hall – life until the end of
time, when Odin is to lead the armies of Ragnarok and end the cycle, turning
the wolf age to the golden age.
In the Vedic tradition, time is
Mahakala – the Great (maha) Destroyer (kala).
Time’s function is to bring Order into Chaos. What is Order? Order is
hierarchy and differentiation. What is
Chaos? Chaos is uniformity and
leveling. In the physical world, take
something hot and something cold and place them in proximity and the tendency
is toward equilibrium. The hot becomes
cold and the cold becomes hot until you have an even lukewarm or cool. Time is the same in the social world – put
the Aryan and the Negro together and eliminate barriers and the tendency is
towards the mu’allawah, or mulatto – to something that is neither one nor the
socialist and democracy are all doctrines which attempt to accelerate this
process; National Socialism, Radical Tradition, Northwest Republicanism – all
of these are trying to retard and reverse it.
The first are doctrines of chaos; the second are doctrines of order.
The question is whether it is
possible to defeat Time. Can the
doctrine of progressivism be reversed?
Can caste, race, sex and other hierarchies be restored? In the Eddas,
Thor himself battles Time in the forms of Elli, nursemaid of Utgard-Loki, and
is wrestled to his knees. When the
apples of Idunn are stolen, even the gods grow old. Even the greatest of gods are challenged by
Time. What Krishna
tells Arjuna about men is true – all men, all warriors, and all things of men
are subject to it.
Yet some God created this order –
and established it for a reason. As the
Pharaoh Akhenaton noted in his Hymn to
the Sun, God created man in his races and divided him, giving a land to
each. To oppose racial differences, and
to try to undo the division of man, is to oppose god himself. Does not God defend his own order?
In the Vedas, Mahakala is Shiva,
who sits on the left hand of Brahma. On
the right hand of Brahma is Shiva’s counterpart Vishnu. Shiva’s dance is Time, which destroys the
world. Vishnu’s role is the preserver,
and Vishnu’s actions is to reappear, spontaneously, through history, in the
form of men – his avatars. Vishnu’s
appearance is like an explosion – the decadent world around him is annihilated
and replaced with the initial Order – which survives a few moments, affirming
the faith of the Aryan, then disappears.
Only the last avatar of Vishnu – the Kalki-Avatar – is finally
victorious. His coming ends the cycle
and starts a new Golden Age or Satya Yuga.
In Shilia Islam, Kalki is the
Twelfth Imam, or the Mahdi. In Europe, Kalki has been found in the myth of the “hidden
king” – of the resurrection of Charlemagne or Frederick Barbarossa. The last avatar of Vishnu to visit the earth
– the last Mahdi, the last Imam, the last Hidden King – was Adolf Hitler, who
appeared, rolled back the decadent world, briefly established a paradise of
Order, and then withdrew, allowing Time to return to its course.
Similarly, in the physical world,
the tendency for ordered systems to avoid descent into chaos requires an
outside force to reverse it. The force
represented by Vishnu is that outside force, acting on a system dominated by
Shiva and his wife, Kali.
So, in plain terms, what does all
this “mysticism” mean?
If the ends of life are to be
found in this world, it is never sensible for the individual to sacrifice
himself, because there is nothing greater than that individual’s life. In this paradigm, one should stay home, keep
one’s head down, never engage in conflict, and go along with whatever can get
you wealth, pleasure, fame, a good reputation, family, security, and which will
extend your life and glorify, or at least preserve, yourself.
This is what the folk you rail against
do. They are comfortable now. They may know in a vague way, that they will
die, but they never think about it. They
believe they can be alive and comfortable forever – and are willing to accept
alive and comfortable now as proof. The
live, as Charles Manson said, in the belief that “now is the only thing that’s
Really, as the doctrine of jihad
recognizes, there are two true means of super-personal existence. One is through participation in an
ethno-cultural or social organism. As Oswald Spengler noted in his Decline of the West, and Yockey expanded on in his Imperium, social collectives – civilizations
and cultures – have a lifecycle just as individual men do. A cultural organism is born, grows, reaches
maturity, expends its power, and then dies.
These organisms are really ethno-cultural, because a culture can only be
the expression of a given ethnic group.
Other ethnicities can mimic the culture, participate in it as outsiders,
or adopt and transform it to their own – but the culture can only reflect on
ethnic or racial way of being.
Individuals are born and die within a culture, but the culture survives
and, in a material sense, the individual continues in this world and achieves a
super-existence through participation in the survival of the ethno-cultural or
This is hat you keep getting at,
Harold. Ironically, you call
participation in the racial-national collective “individualism.” What you mean by this is that White people
should look inside themselves and determine what they are – and not what a
society based on chaos tells them to be.
In a sense, you are correct if you accept Julius Evola’s definition of
individualism as the individual being what it is, and individuation as the
alienation of the individual from his proper place in society. However, insofar as you “individualism” as
the pursuit of the supposed “individual” will against the collective demands,
you are wrong.
You are asking men to
subsume and sacrifice their immediate individual well-being for the racial
collective – you are asking them to commit a selfless, collectivist act. This act is the exact same act that Islam
demands that its followers commit in this world – to wage war and potentially
die or lose their life and property for the benefit of the Islamic collective.
This then begs the question on
which the Jews are beating us. What
should I sacrifice myself for the collective well-being? After all, what investment do I have in the
future of the White race? Why do I care
what White people are doing after I am dead?
And if I must sacrifice, shouldn’t I sacrifice for “humanity,” and not one
particular race? White philosophy
generally ignores these questions, drawing on “natural” feeling. However, modern culture is an anesthesia for
“natural” feeling, so these questions must be addressed.
In Islam, one sacrifices one’s
self for Allah because Allah commands it.
Christianity has a similar, non-warrior, ethic – one suffers in
imitation of Christ to achieve salvation.
Aryan paganism teaches, as we outlined, that sacrifice and death in
battle is the only path to heaven – and that, through proper sacrifice, one
becomes a vehicle through which God or the gods becomes manifest on earth. Because transcendence of the material world
and the achievement of eternal life is the goal of every religion but the Jewish,
the Jews have done so much to dismantle Aryan religion. In fact, before explaining why a White person
should sacrifice for the White race, it is probably necessary to explain to the
debauched and decadent something basic, like why “my” God’s Order – as if the
gods and their order were a product of my imagination- is superior to the
doubting forces of Chaos.
Given that cultural organisms
exist, and that individuals exist in the context of social collectives – that
individuals are not isolated in this world but exist in relation to other individuals
which are more or less dissimilar to themselves – an individual has a social
collective to which he bears a greater affinity than others, and that social
collective is his cultural organism. In
other words, some men are more similar to an individual than others, and these
men will tend to be of the same race and same culture, because racial and
cultural preferences tend to vary together.
That racial and cultural preferences tend to vary together can be observed
empirically and is likely because of variations in DNA which have been observed
and variations of soul which can be hypothesized. Those unable or unwilling to acknowledge the
empirical evidence linking race and the individual behaviors and preferences
which contribute to the cultural collective dispute this foundation of or
argument endlessly, falsifying data and threatening violence – but we set them
aside here, they can travel no further with us.
If men exist as part of cultural
organisms, then individual men have an ideal relationship to that cultural
organism – a way of relating socially that maximizes their happiness. In other words, each individual has a proper
place in a society that reflects their being, and this place allows them to
best express their unique inner self – who they are.
The greatest happiness for humanity is found
in a world in which each individual lives in a racially and ethnically based
society – a culture organism – and fulfills its proper place in that society,
without it being demanded to do more or denied the opportunity to do less. This is caste – the place into which a person
is born – and it is liberating, not constricting.
Multi-culturalism tries to say
that multiple cultures should live in harmony within a single nation – but this
is wrong. Calling someone a “creepy ass
cracker” is part of Trayvon Martin’s culture, it is not part of White
culture. Similarly, the kind of
government needed to control a Trayvon Martin – who would have been speared and
eaten, not shot, had he committed his crimes in his native Africa – is not the
kind of government under which White men prosper. A social organism encompasses all aspects of
social organization – economic, political, interpersonal, and a government must
reflect a given people’s ideal.
And this is to examine
multi-culturalism in its best light, and not in light of the erroneous belief
that all races are one “mankind,” without meaningful differentiation.
So, if men live best in cultural
organisms, those seeking the benefit of humanity would seek to divide mankind b
race and ethnicity, and to allow each race and ethnicity of man its own
territory, its own nation, and its own way of being. I would argue that this philosophy only
properly applies to the White and yellow races – the races that are capable of
living in accordance with Tradition – and that the evidence is that the Negro
race is not properly “human,” and thus deserves the same consideration society
gives to animals and nature – but I don’t seek to make that leap now. To satisfy the humanitarians, I grant that
separate racial nationhood is best for all humans – and leave the term “human”
open. There is no way of contradicting
this view without denying both common, anecdotal observation and the entirety
of the empirical evidence.
I would also argue, though, that
no matter how widely one defines “human,” the White race – and the “Aryan”
segment of the White race in particular – enjoys a special role. The doctrine of Order – of race and caste –
originates in the Aryan segment of the White race, and spread from the Germans
and Nordics of northern Europe to Europe, Asia,
and all the places it resides in the world.
The Aryan has, religiously, been gifted by God with the ability to order
the world – and is, thus, the hereer volk, or “noble people” – to whom
government is given in an ideal world.
That such a people exist is
predicted by the acknowledgement that each man has a proper place within his
culture’s organism. Some must work and
some must rule. This is no different
than the fact that each individual body has a brain an has muscles.
The rulers are not “superior” to the workers,
in the sense that both must perform their proper role for the organism to
thrive, just as the brain and muscles must work together; though the brain
commands the muscles, and the body can lose a muscle without dying, but cannot
lose the brain. And, as there is an
order among collectives of men, there must be order between the races of men –
an ideal relationship in which all races benefit maximally. This order is White world supremacy – or,
really, the supremacy of the Aryan minority among White people.
So, this then begs the question –
since I live in a world which has
fallen far from the ideal, why should I
sacrifice myself to better it, and to bring about an ideal – or, the temporary
resurrection of an ideal – which I may never see?
Well, as Marcus Aurelius noted, in
a hundred years, my body will be dead – so, the question is whether some part
of me is eternal or not part of me is eternal.
If some part of me is eternal, then the goal of me must lie beyond the
things of this world. If no part of me
is eternal, then nothing I do has any meaning.
And, if I’m not certain, it is best for me to err on the side of
immortality – because I lose nothing if I’m wrong.
Only if I’m certain I do not have a soul
should I live only for this world – and no one is reasonably certain of that,
because the existence of one’s self, apart from the body, is the first sense of
all men – at least, all White people.
(Those “people” with animal or demonic souls - the Negro and the Jew – I
admit my experience themselves differently.
In fact, differentiation experiences of the soul, or being, is the basis
of differentiated expressions of the cultural organism.)
The Neo-Platonists came to God by
hypothesizing an original, unmoved mover.
This first cause – the One – spawned the lesser causes – the Forms, or
the lesser gods, or the angels – and the Ideals – in whose image the material
world is molded. Neo-Platonism taught
that man transcends his material being by becoming a vehicle through which the
ideals – what Jung called the archetypes – become manifest. This is a modification of the Vedic notion of
the avatar – that man exalts his own soul by becoming one with the ideal of
himself – an ideal the Egyptians called the ba, the Greeks the daemon, the
Norse the fylgja.
For the warrior, the Romans called this ideal the divine woman, the
Victory; the Greeks, the Nike the Norse, the Valkeyrja or Valkyrie. In Islam, this same notion exists in the
Greater Holy War by brining the body into submission, the soul is exalted to
paradise. Because the individual is
finite, he achieves the possibility of an eternal soul only by participating in
infinity – by making his life, and death, the manifestation of a super-personal
force. We all die – but we do not all
live and die the same.
Thus, among Indo-European peoples,
there has always been a dual notion of the afterlife. On the one hand, there is Hades – the grey,
chthonic nothing into which the souls of the dead dissolve, forgetting and
sleeping until they have lost all individuality. On the other hand, there is Olympus
– the exalted eternity of ambrosia an nectar to which the super-hero or
demi-god ascends, having risen fro a man to an archetype which men may
The Egyptians saw the same – one
could be devoured by Amenet or live eternally with Osiris. The Norse had Nidhagg and Niflheim on one
hand and Odin and Valhalla on the other. There is a death that brings nothingness, and
a death that brings eternal life.
Christianity had the same idea, once, too, before Semitic demons gave
color to its Hell.
So, not only does the existence of
my people in this world depend on my sacrifice, but my eternal soul does as well. Thus, the test is whether I can set aside
those things which can never be mine in a true sense – all the things of this
world outside myself – in favor of that which is always mine – my character, my
righteousness, and my eternity.
Now, in the first age – the Golden
Age, Satya Yuga, or Age of Being - the adherence to dharma – the following of
the law proper to ones inner being – is easier, because good actions bring good
results. Sacrifice in battle, for
instance, is exalted and celebrated by one’s people. A man’s wife demands he come back with his
shield or on it – instead of begging, pleading and crying that he not go off to
war. The question of the existence of
the racial collective and the maintenance of the proper order is no question –
the idea that chaos should be exalted is absent.
But then then comes the Jew. The Jew is the agent of Time, God sends it to
challenge his people. The Jew asks the
questions and tells the lies which make the survival of the collective a
question. And, this is not “dishonest,”
because, lacking a human soul, the Jew truly does not understand. Dharma and its karma – right action and right
results – break down. Right action no
longer brings right results. Those who
do the right thing cease to always “win.”
The material order no longer mirrors the order in heaven.
In time we reach the Kali Yuga –
the Death Age – the Eddic Wolf Age, Axe Age, Age of Cloven Shields. Chaos becomes dominant, Order becomes an
oddity. This is our age. We act righteously,
but, we do no win. When God becomes
manifest, he rules for a time and allows himself to be defeated. Men despair.
Faith in divinity and Order is shaken.
Men sink into despair.
But, who is in charge? Not I.
The man who despairs is the man who refuses to fight – the man who does
not sacrifice – the man who loses himself in pleasure, or who tries to maintain
his comfort by keeping his head down.
This man only wants to be part of something that “wins,” and is willing
to give up his being and sink into the nothingness if Hades if he cannot
“win.” He is the antithesis of the
Hero. He is nothing.
I, though, have no illusions of
“winning.” I know that there is nothing
to be won or lost outside of my own soul.
This world, and my struggle in it, is a test. The first test is whether I can abandon
comfort. The second test is whether I
can preserver despite suffering. The
victory is in my own righteousness. Whatever
I may win in this world is vanity – my only victory is to stand at the hand of
God when he chooses to destroy and redeem the world.
Thus, Harold, you should fight for
the Northwest Republic – and others should join
you. But the victory of the Republic is
only the victory in this world. And,
like all things in time, even a new Roman
Empire with a similar lifespan, ant victory in this world is, in
time, consumed by Time. The real victory
is not in the death of the American democratic infidels and their submission to
National Socialism, but in the struggle by which that victory is brought
about. The defiance of – and conquest of
– death and the ascension to heaven is the victory which allows our souls to be
reborn and to struggle again and again until we are purified and ready to lead
the armies of heaven in the burning of the earth.
The Aryan remnant needs to be
reminded of the virtues of sacrifice and struggle as ends in themselves. Then, you will have the warriors you want.
Shiva and Kali dance on the one
hand. Kali is the substance of the
illusion, the image. Shiva’s will gives
the illusion form, and his dance breaks that form down, from beauty into
nothingness. Vishnu sits eternally on
the other hand, occasionally intervening, joining the dance form outside, and
reminding the dancers of its beauty. But
both are the hands of Brahma, who imagined the world and went to sleep, and
sustains both creation and destruction in his dreaming. Both death and beauty are part of the same
world in which we are imprisoned. Only
when we see clearly both the beauty of Order and the death which is coming to
it can we stand apart and be liberated with the Great Dreamer.
So, fight for your Northwest Republic, Harold, for the race, for
National Socialism, for the Tradition and for Order – and fight to win – but
understand that it is the fighting to win – when you know the odds are against
you, or, better yet, that you are certain you will lose – that is important,
and not the winning. “Winning is in the
mind of God; the fighting is in you.
Be well, Harold, and don’t
* * *
Bill White is currently being held in a windowless cell in Roanoke, Virginia
the size of a broom closet. I can only hope that there is some kind of air
conditioning in there in the July heat. He is not allowed access to phones or
e-mail and he is not allowed to receive books, so all he can do is sit in his
cell for 23 hours per day writing on sheets of yellow legal pad, which he must
pay for. You might want to drop him a small money order for his commissary to:
William A. White #20040199844
Roanoke City Jail
324 Campbell Avenue SW
Roanoke, VA 24016
Bill was supposed to go on trial in late August for the
hideous crime of sending his ex-wife an irate e-mail two years ago and “causing
her to feel apprehensive,” for which he’s looking at twenty years in prison.
Not threatening her, but "causing her to feel apprehensive," which is now thanks to Bill White's multifarious cases a different kettle of fish, legally speaking, and which apparently makes the concept of a "terroristic threat" completely subjective.
The Bill White precedent does not require any actual threat to be made, thus eliminating the need for the "reasonable person" and "credible threat" burdens of proof. All that is necessary is that someone, somewhere, should "feel apprehensive." I am not making this up. In essence, Bill White may spend the next two decades in prison for being rude to his ex, or as he put it to me once when he described his actual offenses, for "aggravated cussing."
again, in this latest case, not even the prosecution claims that Bill actually committed one single
criminal act; at no time during the past six years of horror has a single judge, prosecutor, cop, or other official of the dictatorship claimed that he ever actually did anything at all. He is being kept buried alive and repeatedly prosecuted for speech alone, apparently for the purpose
of establishing legal precedents that this can be done.
understanding at the moment is that the trial has been postponed because the
ex-wife is no longer interested in participating, and because the primary
witness for the prosecution has gone insane and staged a public meltdown on Facebook.
This doesn’t matter since all they have to do is get a few niggers on the jury
and they could convict Bill of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the
fire if they want to. So right now they’re just keeping him in a box until they
decide what to do with him. They may be trying to drive Bill himself around the
twist. He could use some letters, folks.