Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The Commercialization of Cancer

“Our whole cancer research has been a total failure,” exclaimed Dr. John Bailer, who spent 20 years on the staff of the National Cancer Institute and was editor of its journal.

“We are losing the war against cancer,” was the conclusion of a study conducted by the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine.

“Cancer patients who refuse chemotherapy and radiation actually live up to four times longer than treated cases. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, radical surgery on cancer does more harm than good. As for radiation treatment, most of the time it makes not the slightest difference,” said Hardin Jones, M.D., cancer researcher and former physiology professor at the University of California.

Many question the wisdom of investing more time and money into the traditional treatments of cancer that are proven failures. But we persist in failure. Why?

Cancer has metastasized into a multi-billion dollar industry. The pharmaceutical giants, hospitals, businesses that make radiation equipment; plus tens of thousands of oncologists, surgeons, nurses, radiologists, researchers, specialists, and technicians, all depend on cancer for their income and livelihood.

Are we to assume that all these industries are eagerly looking for ways to put themselves out of business and their battalions of employees are zealously working to stand in the unemployment line? Or could the opposite be true?

The reality is that new therapies, however promising, are and must be denied, discouraged, or even disallowed to protect the booming business of cancer. Here in “the land of the free” it is against the law to treat this disorder by any method except that dictated by orthodoxy.

This doesn't imply a grand conspiracy staffed by evil and greedy men. Certainly many believe that chemo, radiation, and surgery offer the best hope for a cure. It also means that many are ignorant either by design or sloth that they are not only far from curing cancer but are causative agents in its perpetuation.

A look at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) illustrate the commercialization of cancer.

NCI is big business. It operates on a $6 billion federally funded budget but only 16 percent of this is channeled into programs for cancer patients. The rest pays for drug research, overhead, a bureaucracy of 3,000 employees, and a $2.6 million annual paycheck plus perks for its chief executive.

NCI's basic function is to channel tax dollars to Big Pharma; two-thirds of all cancer drugs were sponsored, developed, and marketed by this “charity.”

Top management is staffed by persons who were or soon may be employed by pharmaceutical companies, processed food manufacturers, or the soft drink industry. 

ACS is NCI's country cousin. It squeezes by on a paltry $2.7 billion a year. ACS lopsided budget devotes $1 to services for cancer victims for every $6.40 spent for overhead and salaries. Its CEO receives a hefty $2.7 million yearly salary.

The Society is cheek-to-joule with its big donors: Big Pharm, chemical companies, industrial waste companies, fast food chains, cosmetic companies, and the auto industry. Little wonder, then, that ACS steadfastly opposes innovative treatments while being indifferent to cancer prevention.

Dr. Samuel Epstein in his new book, Criminal Indifference to Cancer Prevention, skewers both organizations as well as the cancer industry in general. They, according to Epstein, have spent tens of billions focusing on damage control to the exclusion of prevention. And cancer is eminently preventable.

According to the International Agency for Research in Cancer, “95 percent of human cancer is determined environmentally and thus avoidable.” These avoidable causes are: diet = 35 percent, obesity = 20 percent, tobacco = 30 percent, and alcohol = 5 percent. In other words, it is within our power to eliminate 90 percent of cancer.

Despite these facts, only 1 percent of NCI's budget is devoted to diet and prevention.

The remedy for cancer cannot be found in a drug, or a surgeon's scalpel, or a radiation machine, but in your refrigerator stocked with fresh, organic fruits and vegetables and a larder devoid of sugary drinks, candy, or bakery confections (view YouTube: How to eat to prevent cancer).

So next time the NCI and the ACS roll out a Mad Ave fund raising campaign urging you to “walk to cure cancer,” consider telling them to “take a hike.”

Bob Scroggins
New Milford, PA


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good article. Rings true.

The same is happening with the HIV/AIDS medical industry. It's a huge money maker.

Heretics now say that AIDS is caused by the Homo lifestyle, which was initially claimed when this disease was first noticed.

A good discussion of AIDS and the queer lifestyle that causes it is at www.attackthesystem.com/radio.

To get an edge against cancer it helps to eat a correct diet and get adequate exercise.

To avoid AIDS don't be a fudge-packer or cocksucker.

5:02 PM  
Anonymous Steve the Elder said...

Ozone treatments and Oil of Oregano are powerful cancer killers.. look up Ed McCabe, Mr Oxygen.. he has a book and youtube videos

6:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And guess who most of the cancer docs are?
Gee, how did you know?
Mainly hebes, dotheads, assorted ragheads, and other
affirmative action mud people who are too stupid to practice real medicine. And no one really can claim they are incompetent, since most cancer patients die anyway.
So who is to know whether the doc killed them or the chemo?
As for the hebes, what a perfect scam. They get to kill the hated goyim and the stupid goyim pay for the privilege.

Charles "The Hammer" Martel

7:22 AM  
Anonymous Joseph Anthony said...

Read The Nazi War On cancer! Hitler was the first Western politician to divert massive funds in the search for a cancer cure. He felt strongly about this because his mother died of breast cancer.

6:15 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home