Sunday, February 28, 2010

"All The Whites Will Die Tonight!:

That’s what a Hispanic woman, Miriam Leticia Malave, yelled as she and three Hispanic men began attacking white patrons in the M&T Bar in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania last week. Malave attacked a female bartende Melissa Elrod, with a baseball bat.

Shenandoah is full of Hispanics. How did a small town in Pennsylvania become overrun with mestizos? You’ll have to ask George “Family Values Don’t Stop at the Rio Grande” Bush about that.

Miss him yet? Well, don’t forget – Sarah Palin says it would be “inhumane” to deport people like Malave and her gang of thugs, so you’ll get a chance to vote for more of the same in 2012.

Last September, Malave stabbed a woman in the thigh and stomach outside La Casita bar in Shenandoah. She was awaiting trial on those charges when she led the attack on white people last week.

Plus, in 2006, Malave and “three Hispanic men” tried to attack white people with baseball bats. When the would be victims escaped, they instead began smashing their cars with the bats.

Prosecutors initially charged the four with hatecrime, criminal mischief, and recklessly endangering another person and conspiracy in the 2006 attack, but then dropped all those charges and reduced it to disorderly conduct.

Do you think if four whites had chased a bunch of Mexicans with baseball bats and then smashed their cars up they would have gotten off with disorderly conduct charges, and without a hatecrime charge?

Me neither.

But Miriam Leticia Malave and three other Hispanics got away with it in 2006.

And now, they’ve actually attacked white people with ball bats, while yelling “all whites will die tonight!” and guess what?

The prosecutor hasn’t filed hatecrime charges this time either. In fact, none of the three Mexicans who beat the whites in the bar have even been arrested.

The DA says he “hasn’t ruled out” hatecrime charges in this case.

Hasn’t ruled them out?

Try to imagine the DA “not ruling out” hate crimes charges if four whites had gone after a bunch of Mexicans with ball bats in 2006, and then smashed their cars, and then attacked white people in a bar while screaming that all whites are gonna die tonight a few years later!

The DA would be in jail for a hate crime himself. Eric Holder would see to that.

But, as Eric Holder explained to Congress during hearings on the most recent hate crimes bill, white people aren’t a protected class under hatecrime law.

So get used to it, white man. And be sure and vote for Sarah Palin in 2012, so we can keep on celebrating diversity!

Saturday, February 27, 2010

More Wisdom of the Ancients

Just because you do not take an interest in politics, does not mean politics won't take an interest in you.

-Pericles (430 B.C.)

Friday, February 26, 2010

The Real Reason Behind It All

A thought occurred to me the other day, regarding the true motivation of the Organs.

Many of you will have read George Orwell's novel 1984, the first literary description of a modern Surveillance State. Most readers will identify with the protagonist, Winston Smith. However, I suspect that there are a small minority who have always identified with O'Brien and the Thought Police, and who actually believe that the kind of total surveillance and control depicted in 1984 is a good thing, and they want to be part of it.

I am also struck by the fact that apparently something like 90% of internet bandwidth today is used for pornography. Combining that knowledge with the clear and unabashed drive by the Organs for things like e-mail interception and cell phone interdiction without warrants and the authorization of all kinds of warrantless intrusion, I think I see what they ultimately are driving at.

I believe that the FBI, Secret Service, DHS, Treasury Department and all the other 101 secret police agencies, federal, state, and local, want to obtain the right to install secret fiber-optic cameras or lenses in people's homes, without warrants or supervision of any kind, so that they can watch people having sex.

Their own ongoing, reality porno show. I think that's what they're after. The ability to turn on a camera monitor and watch while oblivious strangers commit their most intimate acts and reveal their innermost selves, the ultimate voyeuristic experience of dirty little boys who no doubt used to spy on their sisters in the shower. I will leave to the fertile imagination what these FBI and Secret Service agents and federal employees will be doing while they watch.

I'm only semi-joking here. There has to be something mentally wrong to begin with, with someone who wants the right to spy on people with no legal reason, no evidence that a crime has been committed, and no conceivable purpose other than spying for its own sake.

Some of us have personally met some of these people. Is this reason I have suggested for their behavior really such a stretch?

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Radio Free Northwest, 2/24/2010

Hi, guys:

Okay, the fifth Radio Free Northwest is now uploaded to the Party website. Go to

and click on the link in the little window, center right, for Radio Free Northwest 2/24/2010, White youth and White paranoia.



Wrong Answer

Dear Mr. Covington:

I am a senior in high school. I took my biology exam this afternoon. I was asked to name something commonly found in cells. Apparently negroes is not the right answer.

-Jennifer K.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

We Have Been This Way Before

"How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: What would things have been like if every police operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? If during periods of mass arrests people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever was at hand? The organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt."

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Monday, February 22, 2010

Hitting It On The Head

Subject: The Itty Bitty Ethnic Minority Who Control America & Their Connection to That Shitty Little Country in the Middle East

We have but 2 to 3 percent Jews in our population, and yet look at the harm they do. They make up 30 percent of the Congress. They totally control the White House, the Pentagon, virtually all federal agencies. Our military are but Israel's mercenaries, constantly murdering innocents that happen to have incurred Israel's wrath. They have made America and Americans hated throughout the world for doing their bidding.

They own and control the Federal Reserve and are basic to the entire debt-money banking scam. They have us into another world-wide depression as before. Wall Street is almost entirely Jewish, as is Hollywood with its immorality run loose today since the Hays Office was eliminated. Five Jewish groups control the radio and TV of the whole country, instilling their sickness in the land. If the doors are wide open to any unwanted illegal immigrants it is because of their doing, as part of their campaign to destroy white, European America.

They control most of the countries of Europe and have made it a crime to speak as I am writing here now. They are trying hard to get their imagined "anti-semitic" prejudices statutized in the US.

Any vilification of Islam is inspired by Jewish hatefulness. They keep feeding the goyim their propaganda and sadly, many pass it on. I have no personal hatred of Jews or of any other people who happen to be unfortunately embodied on this mudball at this time, but I do hate any manner of wrong-doing towards others, no matter by whom instigated, and 90% of it is too obviously Jewish inspired.

In centuries past, Jewry has been expelled from every country in Europe at least once, en masse. This started the very century in which Khazaria lost its own kingdom, after adopting the Talmud in the 8th century. While such an action might quickly solve any country's woes, I doubt today that any modern people might effectuate such an action, outside of Israel anyway, in raped and occupied Palestine. So we will suffer their indignities in hopes of better days, thanks to our Christian morality, which they would like to destroy. It would be interesting wouldn't it, if they succeeded in getting the rest of the world down to their level of degradation, if the goyim of the world rose up and sent them to the moon. Don't think it can't happen!!

Best regards,
Bob Taft

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Yes, Virginia, It's ALL A HOAX

[For those of you who missed one of the most important media articles in several decades, this is from the U. K. Daily Mail for February 14th.]

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

by Jonathan Petre

The academic at the centre of the Climategate affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble keeping track of the information.

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is not as good as it should be.

The data is crucial to the famous "hockey stick graph" used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no statistically significant warming.

The admissions will be seized on by skeptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that skeptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.

The raw data, collected from hundreds of weather stations around the world and analysed by his unit, has been used for years to bolster efforts by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to press governments to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

Following the leak of the emails, Professor Jones has been accused of scientific fraud for allegedly deliberately suppressing information and refusing to share vital data with critics.

Discussing the interview, the BBC’s environmental analyst Roger Harrabin said he had spoken to colleagues of Professor Jones who had told him that his strengths included integrity and doggedness but not record-keeping and office tidying.

Mr Harrabin, who conducted the interview for the BBC’s website, said the professor had been collating tens of thousands of pieces of data from around the world to produce a coherent record of temperature change.

That material has been used to produce the "hockey stick graph" which is relatively flat for centuries before rising steeply in recent decades.

According to Mr Harrabin, colleagues of Professor Jones said "his office is piled high with paper, fragments from over the years, tens of thousands of pieces of paper, and they suspect what happened was he took in the raw data to a central database and then let the pieces of paper go because he never realised that 20 years later he would be held to account over them."

Asked by Mr Harrabin about these issues, Professor Jones admitted the lack of organisation in the system had contributed to his reluctance to share data with critics, which he regretted.

But he denied he had cheated over the data or unfairly influenced the scientific process, and said he still believed recent temperature rises were predominantly man-made.

Asked about whether he lost track of data, Professor Jones said: "There is some truth in that. We do have a trail of where the weather stations have come from but it’s probably not as good as it should be. There’s a continual updating of the dataset. Keeping track of everything is difficult. Some countries will do lots of checking on their data then issue improved data, so it can be very difficult. We have improved but we have to improve more."

He also agreed that there had been two periods which experienced similar warming, from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, but said these could be explained by natural phenomena whereas more recent warming could not.

He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no statistically significant warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend.

And he said that the debate over whether the world could have been even warmer than now during the medieval period, when there is evidence of high temperatures in northern countries, was far from settled.

Skeptics believe there is strong evidence that the world was warmer between about 800 and 1300 AD than now because of evidence of high temperatures in northern countries. But climate change advocates have dismissed this as false or only applying to the northern part of the world.

Professor Jones departed from this consensus when he said: "There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia. For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions." (Because in the Middle Ages there were no civilized people in the southern hemisphere with written languages capable of taking measurements or writing chronicles. - HAC)

"Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th Century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm than today, then the current warmth would be unprecedented."

Skeptics said this was the first time a senior scientist working with the IPCC had admitted to the possibility that the Medieval Warming Period could have been global, and therefore the world could have been hotter then than now.

Mr. Harrabin told Radio 4’s Today programme that, despite the controversies, there still appeared to be no fundamental flaws in the majority scientific view that climate change was largely man-made. But Dr. Benny Pieser, director of the sceptical Global Warming Policy Foundation, said Professor Jones’s excuses for his failure to share data were hollow as he had shared it with colleagues and mates.

He said that until all the data was released, skeptics could not test it to see if it supported the conclusions claimed by climate change advocates. He added that the professor’s concessions over medieval warming were significant because they were the first public admission that the science was not settled.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Epic Beard Man T-Shirts

I presume that most of you are by now aware of who Epic Beard Man is. Somebody’s already cashing in on that video. You can buy your own Epic Beard Man T-shirts from

Some of you who have told me you have T-shirt manufacturing capability might want to try your own efforts at immortalizing this heroic Ancient of Days. (By the way, his real name is Tom Bruso.)


Friday, February 19, 2010

HAC On Joe Stack Case

Audio comment on the Joseph Stack case by HAC. Go to

and click on "Fireside Chat" in the window center right.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Manifesto of Joseph Stack

This is the manifesto or suicide note or whatever of a guy named Joseph Stack, a White man who flew a stolen airplane into the IRS offices in Austin, Texas this morning. He killed himself; as of 11:10 a.m. Pacific Time there's no word on whether he managed to take any of the IRS bureaucrats with him.

Stack was a White man who finally had enough and who snapped--not an unknown phenomenon. Living in this unnatural society literally drove him insane. This guys kind of reminds me of the Michael Douglas character in the movie Falling Down.

Now, instead of one White man immolating himself in a pointless act of suicide, suppose we could get 10,000 White men all concentrated here in the Northwest and working together in unison in order to implement a serious political plan for independence, and a bona fide future for our people, here in our own nation?

Guys, I have a request. Don't crash planes into things or go berserk in shopping malls with a semi-auto or otherwise kill yourselves. You can't shoot down enough niggers or beaners, or blow up enough IRS bureaucrats or whatever to make a difference. There's always more where they came from.

I have a saying that I can find a thousand men to fight and die for the Northwest Republic, but I can't find ten who are willing to WORK for it. That's what we need right now, not pointless plane crashes.

Nonetheless, all that having been said, a racial brother has decided to give up his life in an effort to bring about genuine change, and his last words at least deserve to be heard.- HAC


If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot,” traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician [who] cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t stealing from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God.) We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. [My emphasis - HAC] It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer... and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report ( regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (


(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.


· "another person" is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

· "taxpayer" is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

· "individual", "employee", or "worker" is you.

Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was losing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a **** about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a **** about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy **** up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough. [My emphasis. - HAC]

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of **** at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Radio Free Northwest 2-17-2010

Hi, guys:

Okay, the fourth Radio Free Northwest podcast is now available at

You will see the “new media” window in the center right; click on “Radio Free Northwest” for 2-17-2010.

My voice is kind of gravelly in this one, but the technical quality is improving, I think. Still not exactly where I want it, but practice makes perfect. I will try to get this podcast on the site every week by sometime on Wednesday from now on.


Tuesday, February 16, 2010


In 2009 an illegal alien in Polk County, Florida who got pulled over in a routine traffic stop ended up shooting and killing the deputy who stopped him. The deputy was shot eight times, including once behind his right ear at close range. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed. A state-wide manhunt ensued.

The murderer was found hiding in a wooded area and as soon as he took a shot at the SWAT team, officers opened fire on him. They hit the beaner 68 times.

Naturally, the liberal media went nuts and asked why they had to shoot the poor undocumented immigrant 68 times.

Sheriff Grady Judd told the Orlando Sentinel: "Because that's all the ammunition we had."

The county medical examiner also reported that the illegal alien died of natural causes. When asked by a reporter how that could be since there were 68 bullet wounds in his body, he simply replied "When you are shot 68 times, you are naturally gonna die."

Monday, February 15, 2010

14th Century Economics Lesson

[More Classic HAC from the archives.]

August 19th, 1998

A long time Party supporter recently asked me to clarify a couple of points in the Party program, specifically the prohibition against usury. "Are you going to confiscate all individuals' life savings because they have earned interest?" The short answer, of course, is no, but it did remind me that we need to pay at least some attention to "the dismal science" of economics from an NS point of view. The nature of usury is a good place to start.

BEFORE WE CAN understand the National Socialist solution for the economic woes of capitalist society we must first understand the way our present form of usury-generated finance capitalism arose in the Middle Ages and early Renaissance period. Not for nothing is economics called "the dismal science"; it is not only a complex subject but usually pretty boring. Please bear with me; I'll try to keep this as simple and interesting as I can.

I'm reading a book on Renaissance Italy at the moment, and it's inspired me to use a concrete example from the past to show how our present economic order developed. All this is going to be very greatly oversimplified, of course, but I hope it will help you understand one of the many long paths our people have taken to arrive at our present mess.

FIRST OFF, you need to understand that although Karl Marx was full of sheep dip, he did recognize and articulate certain correct and vitally important things about the nature of capitalism. Capitalism is utterly dependent on the exploitation of human beings for their labor, and in order to function must reinvent Man as a commodity, an economic unit of production and consumption. This dehumanizing concept has proven one of the most destructive aspects of the Jewish incursion into Western civilization.

Secondly, capitalism is dependent for the generation of capital not only on profit, but on the highly cost effective form of profit known as usury, the collection of interest on loaned money. Long recognized as the ultimate tool of Jewish power, usury was forbidden for centuries to Christians (which used to be pretty much the same thing as saying Aryans) by the Church. Only Jews were allowed to practice it and any Aryan found charging interest was subject to a variety of penalties ranging from fines to the public removal of bits and pieces of the offender's anatomy.

Modern day banks would have you believe that the economy is entirely dependent on the charging of interest, but that's BS. The generation of non-production related profit through interest is actually a fairly recent development in man'seconomic history. So how did the economy work in the days before usury? A good case study would be the rise and fall of the great Lombard banking houses of Italy during the Middle Ages.

Okay: let’s say we’re in Venice, a great trading city, about the year 1396. Usury is forbidden to everyone except the Jews, and their interest rates are as high as 50%, so no one but a drunk or a madman deals with them; they exist on interest mostly off the very poor, as pawnbrokers, and the Church has even established a series of interest-free co-op religious pawn shops to try and protect the poor from the bloodsuckers. But if you're a merchant you still have to finance your ventures, so how do you do it?

Let’s say you want to send a ship to Constantinople full of Italian goodies, cloth and worked metal goods and glassware, wool, so forth and so on. You want to bring back the same ship full of Oriental goodies like spices, mahogany, Turkish rugs, etc. We will assign an arbitrary cost to this venture of 10,000 gold florins. You believe that the profit from the sale of your goods in Constantinople and the resale of their goods in Venice will yield 20,000 florins, which for the sake of argument we'll accept as accurate.
Where do you get the money? You can put up the entire ten grand yourself if you’re filthy rich, and many of the wealthiest merchant adventurers do, as well as putting up their lives, for many of these guys are not just businessmen, they're sea captains and explorers and occasional pirates, and they command their own vessels. They can opt to take all the risk, including the risk of the ship sinking or getting captured by pirates, and take all the profit. Or they can look for investors to share the risk.

Since our hypothetical merchant is a good Christian who doesn't want to deal with hebes and a good businessman who doesn't want to pay half his profit to (literally) a Shylock, he goes to one or more of the great Lombard banking houses, the Bardi, the Pazzi, the Strozzi, the Albizzi, or the up-and-coming Medici. These banks are centered mostly in Florence or Siena, but they have branches all over Europe in a day when the first Rothschilds are still haggling with peasants over the pawn of their wooden shoes for a few pfennig.

Our merchant adventurer goes to the banks, most likely several of them because they will be more likely to back him if their individual exposure is less. He explains his venture, shows them the ship so they know it's a stout seaworthy vessel, lets them know he'll be captaining the voyage himself, and points out that he’s got a good track record of a dozen prosperous expeditions prior to this. He looks good to the Lombards, and so they lend him the dough.

The total outlay for this project is ten grand in gold florins. The merchant himself will put up 4,000 florins, or 40%. The Bardi, the Strozzi, and the Medici banks will put up 2,000 each. They know they will have to wait one year for the ship's return to find out how they did. This is the origin of the old expression "when my ship comes in".

If everything goes according to plan, the venture will bring 20,000 gold florins, thus recouping everyone's initial investment and leaving ten grand profit. The merchant will take four grand of the surplus and the three banks two grand each, a 100% return on their investment. Good business—-and something comes of it when those who can afford it get a nice Persian rug or some pepper to put on Aunt Maria's lasagna, which in the days before refrigeration disguises the taste of the half-putrefied sausage she uses in her recipe.

Of course it was all a lot more complicated than that. For instance, in many cases the ship’s captain, if he was not the owner, would have a substantial share and the crew would be paid not only a minimum wage but a small share each as well, plus there was taxes and overhead just like today —- but you get the idea. A rich merchant might send out ten ships a year under this system; three are lost but seven of them return, leaving an overall profit and Venetian society wealthier thereby.

DO YOU NOTE the difference between this system and Jewish usury? The Lombard banking system was based on productivity for profit, whereas the Jewish usury system is a shell game where money multiplies by itself without relation to anything in the real world. Money was to be earned by buying actual things of value low and selling high, by making something or building something or undertaking risks to obtain something material and tangible.

In this example the objective was the importation of X amount of real consumer goods, not the manipulation of numbers on a piece of paper as in, say, today's Stock Exchange or commodities market where there is only the most tenuous connection, if any, between the arbitrary value of the paper and any real or valuable object or commodity. If the voyage didn't succeed, the investors were out their money, and this risk element led to a high degree of caution, canniness, and ability to assess risk as well as encouraged daring and enterprise for higher profits. The merchant princes of Renaissance Italy may have had a taste for luxurious living, intrigue, and poisoning one another, but they never threw money away like present-day governments and multinationals. They had worked and sweated and bled and killed to get it.

Another variation on this system was public works, for example the bridges over the river Arno in Florence, many of which were built by the bankers who were then allowed to collect tolls until they had recovered the expense of construction and a set profit -- after which the bridges became free. There are endless variations: money was lent for agriculture, to build a factory or a workshop, to build a road, whatever, but always something you could touch, feel, taste, use or consume. Money did not magically produce money out of nothing as it does with usury.

So when did usury get its first foothold in the Western economy? Basically, when the Aryan ruling élite of that time, like their counterparts of the twentieth century, lost sight of their principles in the scramble for wealth and started acting like Jews. Unfortunately, the first big capitalist usurers in modern history were these same Lombard bankers in their later stages; the Jews then slid in on the coattails of the true claim that "everybody is doing it," and within a short time were running the whole game.

FROM THE point of view of the lender, usury has one advantage over the productivity or venture-based system: it eliminates risk, for the lender, anyway. But it increases risk manyfold for the borrower, who not only puts his business and his own capital on the line but sometimes everything he possesses.

The borrower signs a bond or contract borrowing ten thousand florins and promising to pay back fifteen come what may, and as collateral he gives the lender the right to seize certain property if he is unable to pay by the stated date. The Lombard banking system was essentially a tool for the production of new wealth, while usury is a system for transferring existing wealth into a smaller number of hands, usually Jewish.

Essentially two things happened. First, a lot of the Lombard banks crashed down through the years when they inevitably made too many bad decisions, creating fewer and bigger banks handling more money led by more unscrupulous men as the Renaissance advanced. (Late Renaissance bankers and financial tycoons were often converted Jews, many of whom continued to practice Judaism in secret and openly favored their own people at the expense of their host nations.)

Additionally, the Church became corrupt and quit enforcing the anti-usury statutes, and the secular princes and dukes and whatnot got into debt to the banks and overlooked the fact that they had begun to charge interest just like the Jews.

Usury crept into our economy in stages, and it was still frowned upon even as late as the nineteenth century. (A character in a Sherlock Holmes story, for example, a ruined gambling nobleman who has mortgaged everything he owns and is about to lose it all, is referred to as being "in the hands of the Jews" by author Arthur Conan Doyle, an expression one could still get away with using as late as the 1890s.) Now, of course, we’ve got credit cards operating out of states like South Dakota with no banking laws to speak of who charge 24% revolving interest —- it's actually cheaper to borrow money from the Mob, organized crime's traditional "vigorish" or interest rate being "six for five" or about 18%.

ANOTHER QUESTION I have been asked is about an NSNet Bulletin wherein I advocated a return to the gold standard. As most topics dealing with money seem to do, this also gets into the Jewish situation. Plus d'argent, voici les Juifs, as the French say.

Money was first invented as a substitute for barter, and for millennia consisted only of gold, silver, and occasionally copper or bronze coinage. Eventually as trade expanded it became too cumbersome and dangerous to go on a trading expedition lugging long mule trains loaded with gold coin, so with the establishment of the first medieval banks the paper bank draft was invented, allowing a merchant in London to travel to Paris carrying only a document instead of heavy bags of money so tempting to bandits, do his business, deposit his profits in the Paris branch of the Bardi or whoever, and then draw them out again from the London branch when he got home. This was the first paper money, and it was specific, like a check made out to only one person.

Eventually the Lombard and later Jewish banks began to issue what today we would call negotiable securities or debentures -— bank drafts for X amount of money with no name on them, which could be used as legal tender to buy, sell, pay, and lend. The practice of individual banks issuing their own paper money continued up until the beginning of this century; you can see all kinds of examples in museums.

In the flourishing and expanding economy of a dynamic young America, private banks, states, cities, even railroads issued their own paper money. But these paper notes or bills were always gold or sometimes silver certificates -— that is, if you had a ten dollar bill from the First National Bank of Philadelphia and you took it in to that bank, you had the right to get a ten dollar gold piece for it. Paper money was originally intended as a convenience, not as a substitute for precious metals.

Redeemability in gold or silver had one big advantage: it kept the money supply under control and pretty much eliminated the curse of inflation and insane interest rates. Almost all the inflationary spirals in the past, aside from the odd catastrophe like the Black Death, have had to do with the uncontrolled issue of paper money, i.e. the Continental Congress period (my grandfather still used the expression "not worth a Continental"); Confederate money; the Weimar period in Germany, etc.

In 1913, this country did something so stupid that it defies rational analysis even today. We handed control of our money to the Jews in the form of a private corporation, the Federal Reserve, every head and important official of which from 1913 to this day has been Jewish. There is no such thing as U. S. currency, only Federal Reserve currency which is by law the only authorized form of legal tender. It took the Jews twenty years to take us off the gold standard and free themselves of the obligation to back up their green paper with gold or silver, but they managed it, and from 1934 onward the Jews have literally had a license to print money hand over fist.

The more paper money there is in circulation, the higher interest rates are charged (and the more impossible it becomes for young White married people to buy a home.) It's all very complicated and I don’t understand all the ins and outs of it myself, but basically the cause of the inflation and the insanely high cost of everything today is due to the Federal Reserve system using our money as a means to enrich world Jewry and loot the Goldeneh Medina -- in Yiddish "The Golden Honeycomb," their word for America.

IN MY NSNET Bulletin I advocated a return to the gold standard as a temporary measure to get the money supply under control, reverse the wage-price spiral and get the cost of living under control, and to see if we can’t slash the incredibly inflated cost of real property to the point where young couples can actually buy a home large enough to raise children in, not some crackerbox condo or renting until they’re forty. What I would eventually like to see...

Ah, well, that's for another time.

"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Northwest Videos

Colonel House Videos

The following videos by Colonel House, which were removed from YouTube due to Judaic complaints, are now available at

This is by way of encouraging you guys to join northwestfront.ning and


I Wish They All Could Beat California Bitches

"Frankly, I don't know what it is about California , but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I'm not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we're number one. There's no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on Macbeth. The three of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don't know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words."

--columnist Burt Prelutsky
Los Angeles Times

Saturday, February 13, 2010


[Interesting bit of correspondence.]

Just did a Google follow-up to an ebay sale of a few years ago I thought you may find interesting.

My listing was for payment by cashiers check/money order only. The buyer, Allyn Kilsheimer of Washington DC sent a personal check. I contacted him that a personal check was not acceptable. In no uncertain terms he told me I was going to take HIS check if I knew what was good for me.

I googled him to find out that he just "happened" to be one of the first people to arrive at the Pentagon after the attack of 9/11. He personally found the "black box" (the one with no serial numbers) and it was his testimony of finding body parts and airplane wreckage that was the basis of proof that an airliner hit the Pentagon.

Just by coincidence his company KCE Structural Engineering was awarded a $22,000,000 contract to rebuild the Pentagon. He had also been on the government payroll on the 1985 Mexican earthquake, the Murrah Building in OKC and the 1993 World Trade bombing.

Who was it that said in politics there was no such thing as coincidence? [It was Franklin D. Roosevelt. - HAC]

-Name redacted, for obvious reasons

Friday, February 12, 2010

That Balloon That Never Goes Up

[This is some Classic HAC found in the archives. Figured I'd play Russian roulette once more, although the Organs might have a hard time explaining to their superiors why they never noticed this article at the time it was first published - HAC]

C-GRAM: September 21st, 2005

Okay, time once again to do what HAC does best: question a Movement sacred cow.

One of the hoariest and most time-honored of such sacramental beasts is the concept of When The Balloon Goes Up.

It runs something like this: the White man is completely lazy, apathetic, cowardly, dazed and confused, and useless. (I have to admit, it's hard to argue with that one.) He will continue to be so, as long as he has his job, his paycheck, his beer in the refrigerator, his television, and the Quickie Mart down the street run by Apu where he can stock up on salty snacks for his long weekends watching niggers bounce a ball. He will never, ever get up off his ass until such time as the supply of all these things is suddenly cut off by some big huge catastrophe, an economic collapse with a massive depression, race riots in the streets, fuel shortages, beer shortages, aliens descending from outer space, or whatever your favorite scenario might be.

This huge catastrophe will create a Mad Max Road Warrior type scenario, and all of a sudden we'll be riding around on motorcycles with green Mohawk haircuts and driving out the muds with crossbows, yadda yadda yadda. (I've never quite understood how a race of people who have spent their entire lives on the couch watching bakketbawl and swilling the worst excuse for beer in the world will suddenly transform into Road Warriors, but we'll let that pass.) Rite-wingers generally refer to this as
When The Balloon Goes Up.

The corollary to this is that since nothing can possibly be done while ZOG remains all-seeing, all-knowing, and all-powerful (which it isn't), there is no point whatsoever in our actually doing anything until such time as The Balloon Goes Up. Or even trying. The people and the times, tsk tsk tsk, just aren't ready for us. If only the people and the times were ready, oh my, such deeds of manly heroism we would do then! But The Balloon hasn't Gone Up, and therefore we can do nothing except "educate" and "wake people up."

Educate, My Ass

If an inquiring mind is ever able to cut through mountains of waffle and get any kind of answer on this subject, "education" usually boils down to nothing more than hiding behind an e-mail address while playing with the computer in one's basement rec room, with a bowl of nachos and a cold brewski beside the mouse. "Education" in practice means circulating the same old material, mostly dating from the 1950s and 1960s or even from before the war, that we've been circulating for the past fifty years about Jews running the Federal Reserve, the Benjamin Franklin quotation, and an endless supply of atrocity stories about black crime.

And of course, there is that lovely, risk-free internet. This is why the Movement of yesteryear consisted largely of a bunch of sad old men who sat around mailing one another news clippings telling one another how bad things are. (Some of them are still around.) Today, it consists mostly of a bunch of sad old men who sit around tapping on keyboards and forwarding news articles all over the internet by e-mail, telling one another how bad things are. But what can we do? The White man is useless until The Balloon Goes Up. Right?

Now let me dare to ask the blasphemous question. Is The Balloon ever going to Go Up? I mean, really?

We've been waiting for almost forty years now for this big disaster to occur that will finally shake the federal monkey off our backs long enough so we can take all those guns out of the closet and clean this mess up. Has anything of the kind ever even come close to occurring?

No. The riots of the 1960s and the 1990s were purely localized events and consisted almost entirely of monkoids trashing their own neighborhoods. There was never any serious danger to the system, and all of these events were brought under control by the authorities in a matter of days. The fuel shortages of the 1970s were annoying, and nothing more. Jug-Ears' incompetence in foreign policy produced gas prices as high as $3.00 per gallon only last summer. White Americans grumbled...nd paid. And re-elected the misbegotten moron in November.

That Balloon Ain't Going Up. Well, Probably Not.

Will there ever in fact be some kind of nationwide catastrophe which will crack the iron bands that crush us and remove the federal government's heavy hand from us all at once, so all of a sudden we find that can do the necessary? (This of course, presumes that we have the necessary physical courage and will to do the necessary under any circumstances at all, which is dubious, but I won't get into that. Since by common consent we don't discuss the character issue within the Movement, there would be no point.)
Will there in fact ever be a depression so severe, a riot so widespread, an event so cataclysmic, that it will affect the supply of basic goods and services in most areas of the United States, to any serious or lasting extent? Will the electric power ever really go off and stay off, silencing the air conditioners and televisions?

Well—it can happen. It certainly happened to the people of Iraq. But will it happen here? Ever?

Or will our future just be one long, endless decline, a gradual deterioration of the quality of life, year after year, as more and more of North America turns into Brazil? I'll be honest. I don't know.

One thing I have learned in the Movement is that making predictions is a dangerous business. But I do believe that if in fact the Balloon were anywhere near Going Up, there would be certain definite indicators, and they would be visible and discussed outside the babblings of rite-wing conspiracy theorists on the internet.

I will say this: there doesn't appear to be any sign that anything of the kind is happening. This is a huge country and it still possesses virtually unlimited wealth. As god-awful as things are, America's ability to absorb economic, political, social, and biological punishment and abuse is still a long, long way from reaching the breaking point.

And you know something? I think all of us know in our heart that the Balloon ain't Going Up any time soon. And hoo boy, are we glad!

That Balloon Lets Us Off The Hook

You remember Leaderless Resistance, the brilliant strategy laid out by Louis Beam? And you remember how and why it failed, because in actual practice it turned out to be all leaderless and no resistance?

Beam's plan was predicated on the idea that these leaderless resistance cells would actually do something. It never happened. The internet came along and everybody retreated into the cool dark of their basement rec rooms and the warm glow of their computer screens.

Do you remember Lone Wolf, the strategy William Pierce tried to inspire with Hunter? What we ended up with instead of Hunters were violent kooks like Ben Smith and Buford Furrow, who were of course cheered on hysterically by people like Tom Metzger and Alex Curtis in order to sell their Skinhead music tapes and videos. As if the White race could be saved by lunatics who hear voices in their head.

Now, am I alone in suspecting that a lot of this talk about When The Balloon Goes Up is just basically an excuse for the White man to continue to do nothing?

Maybe I'm off base, but as Northwest Migration begins to slowly (way too slowly) catch on, I'm starting to hear a lot of this "but we must wait for The Balloon to Go Up." And it's sounding increasingly worried. Here we now have a perfectly legal, perfectly logical, and personally beneficial act that anyone can carry out, and which will advance the cause of the 14 Words and give White people a wonderful place to live. Bluffs are being called, and the Movement is getting jumpy. There is one thing that Movement Man most definitely does not like, and that is having his bluff called.

The Revolutionary Tripod

Where is this leading? Oh, it's leading somewhere. It's leading to an even more subversive idea, one that will have Movement Man befouling his Fruit of the Looms.

Okay, let's recap once again. We need to take another look at that Revolutionary Tripod, the three conditions which are essential for actual political and social change to take place in any society. I know, I know, I have gone over this about five hundred times before, but guys, this is really important. This is really something that we all need to internalize. For there to be revolutionary change the following three situations must obtain:

1. The Withdrawal of the Consent of the Governed. A majority, or at least a significant and effective minority, of the people of a nation or colony must consciously desire an end to the existing political and social order, and its replacement by a new one. It certainly helps if they want your revolutionary movement specifically to replace the existing order, although as Lenin and the Bolsheviks proved, it's not absolutely necessary.

2. A Fighting Revolutionary Party. A political, propaganda, and military vehicle must exist which will express the withdrawal of consent in concrete terms, and which is prepared to replace the existing order, and which is ready and willing to take direct action to do so.

3. The Loss of the Credible Monopoly of Armed Force. All political power is based on the use of deadly force by the ruler or the state, the infliction or threat of bodily harm or death on others, without punishment of those who exercise force in the state's name. This is what makes the policeman's club or gun different from the club or gun in the hand of the criminal. The policeman may do harm without being punished for it, except within certain narrow parameters when he harms an influential, a wealthy man or some other societally protected person such as our minorities, through error or stupidity , and sometimes even then he is never punished at all.

For example, FBI agents inflict terrible tortures on helpless prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere which would earn you or I life sentences if we were to inflict them on anyone without permission from the ruling elite, and yet they are not punished, but on the contrary they are commended and promoted. This is called a credible monopoly of armed force.

In order for any revolutionary movement to succeed, it must first break that credible monopoly of armed force, by demonstrating to the public an ability to do harm to its enemies and not be punished. The people must be made to understand that change is in fact possible, because the state is no longer certainly able to punish those who oppose it. Eventually the revolutionary movement transfers the monopoly of armed force to itself, thereby becoming the established state. This is how revolutions occur.

Now let's back up a bit, to the withdrawal of the consent of the governed and the creation of a viable revolutionary party. How, exactly, is this to be achieved?

Well, first, there has to be one or more legitimate grievances. Those we have in plenty, although they vary from age to age. Our ancestors in 1775 revolted over a paltry tax on tea. Our closer forefathers in 1861 revolted over a massive insult to the South and the Southern way of life on the part of the rest of the United States, as expressed in the election of the demagogue Abraham Lincoln to the presidency. Today we let our own children be routinely murdered, sodomized, deracinated, corrupted in their minds and bodies, and frog-marched into drug addiction, and we sit there staring at the television.
But let's assume that somehow we can in fact overcome the character problem and a significant minority of us do have sense enough to migrate to the Northwest and eventually form a Party of the kind Brad Davis refers to, the kind which we are clearly unable to form now—but let's just suppose. Right. We have our Party. What to we do now? How would we go about bringing on a revolution if, as it appears, that pesky Balloon isn't Going Up?

The Propaganda of the Deed

I know this is going to scare many of you shitless.

We need to start cultivating the habit of in-depth thinking, insofar as we're still capable of it, and thought must be free. Thought must have all the data in order to draw conclusions. Thought cannot be Orwellian and deliberately train itself to avoid certain topics, or else the mind ceases to hit on all cylinders. Maybe if you can be brought to understand the possibilities which would become available to us, if and when we ever deal with the character issue, then we might be able to persuade ourselves to deal with it.

The Reds and anarchists for the past two hundred years, ever since the days of one Gracchus Baboeuf, (don't ask), have theorized about and sometimes practiced something called the Propaganda Of The Deed. In its crudest form it consists of high-profile acts of violence or destruction meant to state a position, a claim, or a cause in such a manner that it cannot be ignored.

Let me repeat those crucial, key words: cannot be ignored.

Democracy is top-notch at ignoring messages that it does not wish to hear, and quietly, genteelly suppressing people and points of view that it finds inconvenient.

It does this with varying degrees of cruelty, up to and including death and torture, but mostly democracy utilizes its control of the public media of information, communication and expression to ignore any serious dissent or alternative to its policies or behavior. Democracy establishes a maze for the rats to run through which they call a political process, and claims that the rats therefore have nothing to complain about. But democracy is a maze that leads nowhere, designed only to perpetuate the existing order of a wealthy ruling élite and to prevent change of any kind. Democracy crushes the rats when they try to escape from the maze.

But what if the rat were to bite?

True, Propaganda of the Deed is very dangerous, and it requires men and women who are willing to give up their own lives in the service of others. We are so far from this condition that I honestly am not worried about being accused of "inciting" anyone to anything with this article. In all the nearly one hundred years of our existence, our Movement has produced exactly one Bob Mathews, one Gordon Kahl, and one Tim McVeigh...maybe. (We still don't know what McVeigh's true agenda was.)

So what is all this babble in aid of? The Reds believe that the Propaganda of the Deed, under certain conditions and with a little bit of luck, is of itself capable of jump-starting a revolutionary process. The ultimate example of this would be the 1916 Easter Rebellion in Dublin.

Taking it further, a revolutionary movement, intelligently led and possessing not only propaganda skills but the ability to deploy Propaganda of the Deed, can sometimes create the necessary conditions for revolution itself. In other words, The Balloon does not have to Go Up before the revolutionary struggle can begin.

Historical results? Well, to be sure, they've been mixed.

It works quite often in Third World coups, (the assassination of Omar Trujillo in the Dominican Republic comes to mind) but we won't count those as genuine revolutions. In 1881 the assassination of Czar Alexander the Second definitely didn't succeed in bringing about revolution in Russia; Lenin had to wait until 1917. The assassination of the King of Iraq worked, eventually. The storming of the Bastille is a maybe. The murder of the Duchesse de Praslin in 1848 brought down the last King of France. The Kirov murder in 1934 enabled Stalin to launch his major purges, although there's a good chance Stalin himself had Kirov whacked. The Pazzi conspiracy of 1478 in Florence failed miserably. (Now you get some idea of what I do with my time, not having the financial wherewithal to go gambling on riverboat casinos.)

People, we've got to discuss the character issue. Not now. I know we're not ready. But it's going to have to be soon. Our race is running out of time, and hard decisions must soon be made.