Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The Obama Cult Gets Weirder and Weirder

[This wandered in off the internet, unattributed. I know it's long, and reading it will hurt your head, but it's very close to the bone in its analysis. People, you have got to try and wrap your minds around it. You must recover our ancestors' ability to sit down and read a lengthy block of text for content, because there is vital information that we of the older generation MUST pass on to you, and we simply don't have the technical and computer skills to turn everything into a South Park cartoon with dancing turds and gigantic Barbra Streisand robots. - HAC]

The Trans-National Elites and the Populist Response

Recently, Winds of Change put up a post asserting that Obama's probable victory in the race for President signals a new model for electoral success. Boiled down to its essentials, the post argues that trans-national elites have become fed up with America, American patriotism and populism, and are making themselves heard by telling America what to do, how to do it, in an auction available to the highest bidder. The essentials are proposed as this:

*Media support that suppresses any reporting of illegality in fundraising or anything else by Obama.

*Vast monetary advantage by tapping the global pool of (illegal) foreign contributions from trans-national elites, including Saudi, Pakistani, Hamas, and Hezbollah/Iranian money.

*Government funded vote fraud and mass-rallying organizations (ACORN).

*Intimidation and bullying a la The Coming Thugocracy. This model, that of a trans-national elite, taking steps to control the US presidential election, does seem to describe what Obama's campaign really is.

There are other data points. San Francisco columnist Mark Morford describes Obama as a Lightworker, a near-parody of the WB series Charmed "White Lighter" characters:

"Here's where it gets gooey. Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul."

There could be nothing more trans-national than this statement above. A more stunning repudiation of nationalism, America, and populism could not be imagined.Then there is the Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Jonathon Valania, who argues, seriously, that White people should not be allowed to vote because they are "racist" and won't vote for Obama. Or Barack Obama himself, who noted:

"I’m not interested in the suburbs. The suburbs bore me."

You could not invent the more perfect, elitist, yuppie, trans-national statement, hostile to the people and where most of the majority population lives.

This is standard stuff in Europe, where trans-national elites run most of Europe, save for Putin's Russia, and parts of Eastern Europe, and Italy. In places like the UK, or France, or Spain, or Germany, or Sweden, liberal and Jewish elites suppress nationalism, nationalist feeling, any measure of populism, and push the agenda of the trans-national elite, who form a sort of new medieval priesthood who try to tear down national institutions and national feelings, not to mention the national peoples themselves, to construct a new trans-national "Peoples of the World." It is why you see considerable effort to replace native European populations with that of North African or African populations, and Dutch or Swedish politicians stating that they eagerly await the day when natives are a minority and Islam rules the land.

In most places in Europe, even places like Spain or Ireland, this sort of trans-national elitist politics works, because transfer payments from places like Germany and the UK allows trans-national elites to dispense various goodies, usually in the form of welfare payments or free government services to enough voters to assemble a winning coalition.

This is why, even as European nations become overwhelmed with immigrants, who have declared de facto independent states where natives dare not tread and the law does not apply (such as the UK's decision to allow Sharia Law to have the full force of common law in Britain), governments responsible get elected and re-elected. While trans-national elites disparage unifying symbols such as flags, national symbols, national history, voters don't punish them. They have their goodies, and for now, that works.

Obama's probable victory is merely a transfer of the successful EU model, of trans-national politics, to America. However, the elites who make up the trans-national elites do have weaknesses, ones that make them vulnerable, and likely to create a world-wide backlash.

First, it's useful to note where trans-national elites do not hold sway: Italy, Austria, Russia, and parts of Eastern Europe. Russia was simply too corrupt, violent, and inherently nationalistic for the trans-national elites to hold sway. It's laughable to think that someone like Mark Morford, or Jonathon Valanian, much less Barack Obama, would face down a hardened KGB killer like Vladimir Putin, or any of his crew. In places where violence rules, and guns trump money from afar, trans-national elites are like medieval priests confronting marauding Vikings. Helpless.

Eastern Europe was of course, too poor, corrupt, disorganized, and chaotic for trans-national elites to give enough patronage money for local elites to build electoral alliances. The same holds true for Austria and Italy. Italy is quite instructive — notoriously corrupt, plagued by inefficiencies, no one expects anything from the government, and tax evasion and payoffs are a way of life. Indeed, the Lega Nord and other right oriented political groups are successful there, as in Austria, because people are concerned about influxes of immigrants. In Italy, the flood of North African, and Balkan (mostly Roma/Gypsy) illegal immigrants, has not been balanced by successful payoffs or patronage/welfare payments to enough voters to create a winning coalition. Meanwhile, Italians, Austrians, Poles, Bulgarians, etc. are not about to abolish their nations for some hazy notion of "citizenship of the world" and certainly not without lots of money flowing to lots of voters and people.

This was the same problem facing the Catholic Church's medieval priesthood. While most of the educated, literate, and money-controlling people in Europe were priests, bishops, and archbishops, as well as the early Jewish banking and financial elite, they could not form patronage networks to rival that of the kings, at the head of feudal patronage organizations. Significantly, the priests could field no direct armies, or put men under arms themselves. The history of Europe from the 1100's onwards is a steady consolidation of power by kings creating nations, and a long slow recession of international power by the Catholic Church.

The kings of medieval Europe could not match the production of wealth that the Catholic church's monasteries produced. The kings could not produce the large amounts of educated, loyal to Rome, and absolutely required functionaries that the Church alone provided. But the kings could create alliances to seize said monasteries and distribute the wealth among themselves and barons, such as Henry the VIII. Or found universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, and the University of Paris, to create their own, loyal, literate functionaries. Because while the monasteries were a huge source of wealth, they could not be defended. Defending the wealth required men under arms, something the Church was never able to produce. In the same manner, the Obama model of media in the tank, illegal foreign money (not reported by said in the tank media), voter fraud, and thug tactics has a weakness.

By moving entirely outside the media, through building grass-roots organizations, populists can control their message and use it create wedge politics, particularly through using nationalism and populism. This would include such things as various social events, private insurance, entertainment events, and so on. Particularly as the global economic crisis makes the ability of trans-national elites to provide welfare payoffs to broad slices of the electorate very questionable. [I notice this author pointedly avoids the obvious necessity of re-introducing the gun into American and Western politics. - HAC]

In addition, populism and the notion that trans-national elites are "traitors" to the nation, putting the interests of illegal immigrants and various minority groups ahead of the nation and native majority have proved quite successful. Italy's Berlusconi, to use one example, used precisely this message to win election and stage a comeback after having been written off as politically dead.

The more that Harold Myerson of the Washington Post writes about how America must "abolish Whiteness" by such gems as this:

"In a year when the Democrats have an African American presidential nominee, the Republicans now more than ever are the white folks' party, the party that delays the advent of our multicultural future, the party of the American past. Republican conventions have long been bastions of de facto Caucasian exclusivity, but coming right after the diversity of Denver, this year's GOP convention is almost shockingly -- un-Americanly -- white."

The more the trans-national elites take this direction, the more they can be attacked with impunity as the enemy of the nation, it's traditions, and most importantly, it's majority. When Barack Obama's favorite Catholic priest Father Pfleger calls 401K plans "racist" and Obama's advisors write of plans to tax 401Ks to pay for redistribution of wealth, from Whites to blacks, as part of a "reparative" measure to atone for slavery and segregation, this is a golden opportunity for identity politics. As per the 2000 Census, the population breakdown is 75% White, 12% Black, and 13% Hispanic. Now, while Whites may have declined relative to that census, it will be only marginal, and the majority of the nation is still overwhelmingly White. It is not good politics to attack the White majority, without offering a la Britain or France, lots of free services and transfer payments to make those attacks palatable. It's worth noting that both France and Britain are having political problems now that their budgets are being stretched by too much resources devoted to minorities, and not enough to the natives.

In some ways, the McCain campaign is the last gasp of the old Republican Party, before the coming wave of identity politics. It is unlikely that future Republican nominees will play nice. Explicit appeals to identity politics and questions of fairness will be the rule. The new populists, in the US and elsewhere, will remind the White majority that the alternative favors immigrants and minorities in spending decisions, and policies.

The media, in the tank for the trans-national elites, because they are trans-national elites themselves, will be bypassed in favor of grassroots organizations. Offering entertainment, social events, celebrations of national traditions and holidays, parades, and likely insurance, and other benevolent association benefits that tie people to the populist organizations and offer an alternative from government run programs that will by definition be oriented towards trans-national elites and minorities.

Moreover, it's easy to point to all the foreign money and paint the trans-national elites and the media as traitors to the nation, and enemies of the majority of the people. It is a simple matter to show the intimidation and thugocracy of minority-oriented governments, be it an Obama thugocracy, or that of a Sarkozy, or Gordon Brown Sharia-compliant regime, and make the case that the majority, made second-class citizens or worse in their own nation, have no other alternative but the populists.

Even more effective, offer money "seized" from affirmative action programs, or minority-oriented programs, to be spent on the majority. One such proposal would be to end affirmative action and guarantee any citizen (but exclude foreigners) free college tuition for a "B" average in high school. This is the equivalent of the kings and barons seizing the monasteries. There is a lot of money and property that the trans-nationals have, and they don't have much power to defend it. [Okay, here the author starts to wander a little closer to the necessity of armed force. - HAC]

While their power, like that of the medieval priesthood is considerable, it is not unstoppable. And it is likely to produce a nationalist, populist backlash all around the West as the opposition sees the rules and devises an end-run around them, taking advantage of the weakness.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Democracy begets garbage. Manipulated lowest common denominator. "two wolves and a lamb arguing over what's for lunch" according to Ben Franklin; as the famous adjective coined by William Pierce echoes in my mind:
"every featherless biped".

8:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lots of luck overcoming American intellectual laziness, Mr. C.

4:29 PM  
Blogger Armed With Knowledge said...

Hmmm...I didn't find this as long as I expected based on your intro. It was good, anyway. However, I would argue that the Republican Party is MOST definitely not the future of the national resistance. Here's why:

5:27 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home