Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Cheney Go Splat? No Go Splat.

I was tempted to sit down and write a succinct commentary stating exactly what I think about the Taliban's attempt to make Dick Cheney go splat, but I decided I'd better not. You know, the whole post 9/11 thing.

It's difficult to remember that there was a time, and not so long ago either, when American writers didn't have to look over their shoulder and parse every word and sentence before they set pen to paper, or fingers to keyboard, lest one end up catching the rays down in Guantanamo Bay where no one can hear the screams from democracy's torture chambers.

It seems like a century ago that we actually still had some vestiges of freedom and Constitutional rights in this country. Can it really be only six years? [Sigh....]

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Gay Rabbis? Gevalt!

What's the Yiddish word for "lavender?"

According to a Reuters news article, "Leaders of the Conservative Jewish movement opened the door on Wednesday to the ordination of gay rabbis and the recognition of gay marriage..."

This move may well have less to do with Judaic theology and more to do with the collection plate. Religious Jews (as opposed to racial Jews) are actually having the same problem that almost all of the establishment churches like the Episcopalians and the Methodists and Lutherans and so forth are having--church and synagogue attendance is plummeting through the basement floor, as organized religion comes to bear less and less relationship to anything in the real world, and less and less relationship to actual Christianity or Judasim.

Even the Protestant evangelical congregations of the Pat Robertson ilk who combine religious and political blasphemy by worshipping the Jews instead of worshipping God are starting to bottom out; apparently (and to my amazement) the supply of ignorant fools with nothing but pork fat between their ears is limited in this country.

The result of established religion's increasing irrelevance is that the income of establishment churches has dried up alarmingly, and many of these outfits are forced to chase after faggots because, not having families to support and generally having overpaid, non-productive jobs of various kinds, homos are a well-known source of disposable income for perverted and left-wing causes. (At least until they get AIDS, at which point most of that disposable income has to go for various drug cocktails to keep their sodomitic asses alive.)

The one exception normally would be the Catholic Church, traditionally the wealthiest of all denominations, especially in real estate, but the Catholics have been badly hit over the past few years by small armies of men coming forward to claim, truthfully or otherwise, that they were molested by priests as altar boys--all of them, of course, with their hand out for their share of the golden shower (pun intended) the Church is raining down on this issue in a vain effort to change the subject and make it go away.

Shaking down the local Catholic diocese has now become kind of a cottage industry in some parts of America. I wonder if the Conservative Jewish rabbinical authorities who have approved gay rabbis have quite foreseen the consequences of their decision down the road, when little Hymie Schmuckstein the yeshiva boy comes forward with his hand out demanding compensation for having allegedly been molested by the Holy Rabbi Irving Rosen-boig or whatever?

The article states that "There are perhaps 6 million Jews in the United States, only about a third of them affiliated with a congregation." This is incorrect; most Jews actually do not practice their religion in a synagogue. There is no way of telling how many actual Jews there are in America, but my guess would be at least twice the official number, say twelve million. If you include Canada, that could tack on a couple of million more.

Orthodox Judaism has always highly condemned homosexuality in Jews, because they realize that homosexuality is a threat to the continued existence of any race who practice it, including their own. Recently, the Orthodox rabbis of Israel mobilized their private armies of thousands of Hasidic thugs to prevent a "Gay Pride Parade" in the holy city of Jerusalem, threatening to assault the parade and kill the faggots if it proceeded. The Israeli police gave in and canceled the parade's permit.

Of course, if any Christian group had tried something like that in this country, those same rabbis would have been bellowing at the top of their lungs for the FBI to come in and arrest everyone for "civil rights violations."

The first rule of Judaism is: "Do as we Chosen People say, not as we do."


Monday, February 26, 2007

Septuagenarian Strangles Nig-Nog

Given the high incidence of non-white on white crime, it's a pleasure to report the following: a seventy year-old American military veteran strangled a Costa Rican criminal who attempted to rob him and his shore party, with his bare hands.

From Yahoo News: "The assault occurred during a ship stopover Wednesday in Limon, 80 miles east of San Jose, Costa Rica's capital. Adams was with 12 American tourists who hired a driver to explore Costa Rica for a few hours. They were climbing out of the van to visit a Caribbean beach when three masked men ran toward them, she said.

"One held a gun to her head, while the other two pulled out knives. Suddenly, one of the tourists, a U.S. military veteran trained in self defense, jumped out of the van and put the gunman in a headlock, according to Limon police chief Luis Hernandez. Hernandez said the American, whom he refused to identify, struggled with the robber, breaking his collarbone and eventually killing him. Police identified the dead man as Warner Segura, 20. The other two assailants fled.

"Afterward, the tourists drove Segura to a hospital, where he was declared dead. Sergio Lopez, a Red Cross auxiliary, examined Segura's body and said he died from asphyxiation." (I.e., the old man strangled the beaner to death.) "Costa Rican officials interviewed the Americans, and said they wouldn't charge the U.S. tourist with any crime because he acted in self defense."

Gee. That's mighty white of them.

Yahoo further informs us that "Costa Rica has struggled with growing violence and crime in recent years. University of Kansas student Shannon Martin, 23, was stabbed to death in 2001 after she left a nightclub in Golfito, 105 miles south of San Jose."

Another Natalee Holloway case, sounds like. What on earth is it that white girls are looking for when they go partying in a "night club" a hundred miles deep in the South American jungle? (Well, actually we do know. They're looking for interracial sex; it's called "mud-larking" among degenerate kids these days, and like Natalee Holloway, sometimes these stupid bimbos get more than they bargained for.)

We have plenty of Latinos and blacks in this country, you know. Why do we go on holidays to nigger-invested Third World plague spots? If one wants to risk being attacked, robbed, and possibly murdered by Third World criminals, why not just stay home? It's cheaper.


Sunday, February 25, 2007

It's A Jungle Out There

Representative Tom Tancredo recently made the amazed public declaration that the state of Florida is becoming a Third World nation, and so it is. (Congressmen Tancredo needs to be congratulated on his keen and insighfful grasp of the obvious.)

But Florida has also become something of a wildlife refuge for certain other kinds of illegal immigrants from the Third World--such as the Burmese pythons which have escaped into the wild, started breeding, and which are now challenging the native alligators for swampland habitat and engaging in titanic combats with the American reptiles for mastery of the environment, resembling monster battles from 1950s science fiction movies where Godzilla meets Mothra or whatever.

For some odd reason, a combination of illegal aliens and just plain kooks seem to be intent on importing all kinds of weird non-native animal species into Florida and turning them loose. Those species which have been successfully transplanted so far include the deadly pythons and also South American spider monkeys and now--giant rats.

A recent media article opens: "As the rising sun danced across Florida's coastal waters, government workers in shorts and T-shirts knelt in a grassy island field and plucked wriggling rats from traps laid the night before. These weren't just any rats. They were 3-pound, 35-inch-long African behemoths. They squirmed as the workers, wearing protective gloves, removed green radio collars that had been tracking the rodents' movements. All 18 of the animals were carted away for research."

Huh? Three pounds and almost a yard long? That's one big-ass rat.

The Breitbart article goes on: "Darin Carroll kept a watchful eye on that dawn mission at Florida's Grassy Key Island. Carroll is no ordinary G-man. He's a disease hunter determined to stop the next outbreak. Carroll works for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and for three years he has painstakingly tracked the journey of Gambian rats from their African homeland, through the exotic pet trade, and to U.S. homes. His quest is to prove what many scientists suspect: that African rodents imported as pets caused a monkeypox outbreak in the Midwest in 2003 that sickened dozens of adults and children with a virus related to smallpox. Scientists suspect Gambian rats may play a role. Similar outbreaks have occurred in Africa."

I'm sorry, my mind still hasn't quite wrapped around this. We have yard-long African rats running around spreading diseases in Florida? Somebody brought infected three-pound monster rats into this country as pets and let them go? Is this something off the Science Fiction Channel? Apparently not.

Breitbart continues: "Florida and U.S. officials are trying to raise enough money to kill off the Gambian rats that have proliferated on Grassy Key Island, just a few miles from the coast of one of the country's most populous states." (Somebody should tell the neocons in Washington that the beasties are Iraqi rats and part of a terrorist plot, and then Dick Cheney will have his drunken little sock puppet in the Oval Office shell the island with Cruise missiles to exterminate them.)

Evidently they're not just in Florida either. The article says that "The first time Carroll, 34, came face-to-face with a live Gambian rat was in 2003 when the CDC dispatched him to suburban Chicago during the monkeypox outbreak." (Sure that wasn't just a common Chicago sewer rat?)

Well, why not, after all? If we don't control the diseased human life that comes across our totally open borders, why control the diseased animal life? At least America is consistent in its death wish. And here's a thought: those huge African rats down in Florida can serve as food for the pythons.




Saturday, February 24, 2007

Police State Arrives In California

Every society has to have a scapegoat, an officially persecutable minority who can be harassed and harmed, insulted and degraded in order to make the otherwise obedient majority feel big and strong and powerful, even though they are in fact nothing but servile peons themselves.

American society has several official scapegoats, notably White racists or nationalists of any kind. The other big scapegoat in American society are people who use tobacco, as most of our parents did, and as people in America have been doing for centuries since the Indians introduced it to the white man in revenge for our giving them whiskey.

The most comprehensive smoking ban in the United States has now been instituted in a small yuppie suburb in California called Calabasas. Smoking in all public places is prohibited--parks, streets, sidewalks, restaurants bars, parking lots, sports events, anywhere. True, technically speaking, you can still light up if you stand at least "at least 20 feet away from any path of travel, doorway or place where people congregate," according to the city's web site at http://www.cityofcalabasas.com

In practice that means that unless smokers want to walk around town with a twenty-foot pole over their shoulders, they can't smoke in public.

People will still be allowed to smoke in their own homes, but not on their balcony or back yard if it is "adjacent to a common area" such as a swimming pool or tennis court or parking lot. People who perversely insist on deciding for themselves whether they will smoke will be ticketed and possibly fined. The city said it expects to rely on warnings and citations but will consider more serious penalties for willful or repeat offenders.

Smoking is already banned in such places as public beaches and in most playgrounds and parks in most parts of southern California. (That rumbling sound you here is Brian Wilson rolling over in his grave.) The official excuse is that public smoking exposes other people to "second hand smoke," but outdoors in California it is of course impossible to tell how much of the air pollution comes from tobacco smoke and how much comes from car exhausts and other atmospheric contaminants.

What these increasingly draconian bans are in fact are attempts to institutionalize liberal social engineering and get us used to being told what to do with our own lives and our own bodies by liberals. (Of course, when conservatives try to save infants' lives by doing the same thing with abortion, a woman's "right to control her own body" becomes immediately sacrosanct.)

Friday, February 23, 2007

The Perils of Democracy

I heard an interesting remark today from some caller to NPR, of all places, reference the mess in Iraq: "Democracy got us into trouble, but apparently it can't get us out."

He's starting to catch on.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Becoming Illegal

(Actual letter from an Iowa resident and sent to his senator)

The Honorable Tom Harkin
731 Hart Senate Office Building
Phone (202) 224 3254
Washington DC , 20510

Dear Senator Harkin,

As a native Iowan and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.

My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years. I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.

Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.

Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year.

Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.

Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.

If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.

Thank you for your assistance.
Your Loyal Constituent,
Donald Ruppert
Burlington , IA

Get your Forms (NOW)!! Call your Internal Revenue Service 1-800-289-1040. Please pass this onto your friends so they can save on this great offer!!!!

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Confessions of a Bigot

This is an "oldie but goodie." Written about thirty years ago by an anonymous Chicagoan, it is prophetic and just as pertinent today as then. - HAC

Ten years ago I was a firm believer in racial equality. I lived in Chicago, in a White locality of good homes and handsome apartment buildings. When blacks began moving into the neighborhood I almost welcomed them. Willy-nilly, I watched integration happen before my very eyes.

Six months later, the nice buildings were wrecks, the Whites were gone, and the area was a social and physical shambles. Filth, garbage, drugs and crime were rampant. White skins were the target of vicious, blatant, organized black racism. When it became totally unsafe to live in the neighborhood because of roving trigger-happy gangs, I moved my family to another part of the city two miles distant.

Again, it was an excellent neighborhood, with handsome single-family homes in the $100,000 to $125,000 class, near the South Shore Country Club, dotted with luxury apartment buildings. There I lived through precisely the same experiences I had moved to escape. It was like seeing a movie for the second time. Once again the black tide came rolling in on waves of drugs and crime. Once again roving gangs of heroin addicts and vandals made the night hideous with catcalls, boomboxes, smashing glass and gunshots. I saw blacks copulating behind hedges, standing in doorways, in cars parked along the curb, totally indifferent to public decency. I saw people mugged and autos being stripped. I saw crimes that deserved shooting on the spot. I saw theft in grocery stores. I found piles of human feces in the foyer, without benefit of toilet paper, and our janitor informed us this was a common occurrence in Negro apartment buildings.

In our three-story apartment building, containing 120 apartments, it was a nightly occurrence to see men urinating from upper floor windows. Daylight would reveal the dripping, reeking stains down the building's walls. Bloody, screaming fights to the accompaniment of smashing glass and splintering furniture were regular events. Not once did I ever see blacks clean up their mess. Garbage disposal consisted of tenants dumping trash out of windows, breaking every glass bottle in sight, throwing old furniture into the gutter, stuffing rags into broken windows and casting plastic containers and old paper to the four winds.

So I moved again, this time three miles further south to another decent neighborhood. Again I endured the same scenario, line for line, cue for cue. I left Chicago finally with a profound racial prejudice. I came from a background of White poverty every bit as pervasive and humiliating as that of a black slum, but instead of turning to crime or welfare I went to work. I didn't go around whining with my hand outstretched for alms and charity. Even in the midst of grinding poverty my home and the homes of our White neighbors were clean. No filth, no drugs, no public immorality, no illegitimate children, and no physical danger to our persons or our property. We slept with unlocked doors and open windows.

Liberals mouth the myth that the black population is the victim, not the cause, of the deplorable condition of the inner cities. They are wrong. Wholly, completely, entirely, absolutely 100% wrong. They do not know what they are talking about. If they were to undergo the experiences that I and every other White who has lived in a black neighborhood has had, they would not make this palpably ludicrous claim.

Blacks want handed to them on a silver platter what Whites have worked hard for generations to achieve. Blacks try to excuse their rioting, looting, burning and killing on the grounds that they are "oppressed" by the White establishment. They weep tears the size of golf balls because they have been "deprived of their self-esteem." They would cheerfully destroy this nation in a racial holocaust beyond imagining. All the White racism in the United States and throughout the world cannot equal the insane, hate-filled racism of blacks.

Intimate contact with blacks proves that there is an unbridgeable gulf between the two races. To perpetuate this lunatic idea of "equality" is to drive further into the heart of this nation the stake of racial conflict. Only when it is understood and accepted as a fact of life that there are fundamental physical and mental differences between blacks and Whites, with new legal, social, and economic policies based on this recognition---only then will there ever be any kind of tranquility. Present-day equalitarianism is a tocsin of doom for America. How anyone can deny this, after what has happened in recent times, is incredible. Yet the government and the media continue to encourage and perpetuate the status quo.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Brits Packing To Leave Iraq

Tony Blair just announced the beginning of a British troop withdrawal from Iraq. Looks like Bush's lap dog finally turned on his master and gave him a nip in the ass.

Better get the squaddies out quick, Tony, because that drunken jug-eared moron in the White House is going to be attacking Iran any time now, and a million heavily armed, well-trained and fresh Persian troops are going to come storming across the border right into Basra province to help their fellow Shi'ites--that's headlong into your lads.

Or had you already figured out that British troops would probably bear the brunt of the initial Persian counterattack on the ground, as I am sure Bush and his little Jewish neocon friends factored into their plans? Is that why you're pulling out, Tony? Because Jug-Ears has finally shoved you aside and stabbed you in the back one too many times?

Do you begin to understand now, Tony, what kind of trouble your subservience to the Jews in your own establishment, like Lord Levy, aka "Lord Cashpoint," has gotten you and your country into?

Monday, February 19, 2007

Abraham Lincoln on Race

(In honor of Presidents' Day.)

"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races." (Spoken at Springfield, Illinois on July 17th, 1858; from Abraham Lincoln: Complete Works, 1894, Vol. 1, page 273).

"See our present condition---the country engaged in war! Our White men cutting one another's throats! And then consider what we know to be the truth. But for your race among us there could not be war, although many men engaged on either side do not care for you one way or another.

"Why should the people of your race be colonized, and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated." (Spoken at the White House to a group of black community leaders, August 14th, 1862, from Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Vol 5, page 371).

"I will say, then, that I am not nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races---that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with White people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the White and black races which will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior,and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the White race." (4th Lincoln-Douglas debate, September 18th, 1858; Collected Works Vol. 3, pp. 145-146).


Sunday, February 18, 2007

The Shape of Things To Come

[Not all of our contacts are in humbler walks of life. I recently asked a gentleman who is in a position to know--you'll have to take my word on this, but he is--exactly what he thought would happen when Jug-Ears attacks Iran this spring. - HAC]

Dear Harold,

I think [oil] prices will go very high. I imagine that the strategic petroleum reserve will be opened to help suppress the price, but I see it as a great stressor forcing prices upward for a good long while, unless the matter is indeed nuclear and over right away--although then there is the matter of damage to their fields.

No matter what, I am convinced that Peak Oil is real and part of the reason we are over there. There is no escaping that energy prices will continue to rise for quite some time. The game plan is, in part, to destroy demand, first through high prices. This may be the only way to control surging demand.
[I agree. The intense suffering this will cause for White working class families is a matter of complete indifference to the wealthy men and Jews who rule us. - HAC]

If Iran can get their Silkworm missiles into the US Navy, the real rodeo will be on for a long time, I suspect.

It seems also that there is no mistake that the dollar is to be destroyed, and I suppose replaced with the Amero. I suspect this is bound to hurt the average man, asset wise. So, if staying in the US, maybe the best thing to do is own some gold, oil, and land--and probably land in the NW migration area where, if need be you can live, and grow your own food. Like Will Rogers said, "buy land, they ain't making any more of it." Land prices should hold value, gold in correct form will hold, but will be subject to government monkeybiz, and oil and gas will continue to gain in value and necessity. Always a market.

Anybody who thinks solar, wind, nuclear power, etc. will replace oil and gas, should read Matt Savinar's book, The End of the Oil Age. BTW, he wants to move to Oregon and buy land to survive on. Predicts world population of 600 million in perhaps 150 years!

I say this is plausible for m
any reasons. One, as he theorizes, based on oil/energy alone--without cheap energy, we can't feed billions.

And also, politically aligned with NWO, the elimination of a few billion people to extend a higher lifestyle for those at the top.

Oil and gas prices are not likely to sag down very much or for very long, even when manipulated down for elections, and politics.

Personally, I am thinking I have about 5 years to make a sack full of cash and then better have a hidey hole somewhere, complete with canteen, jerky and ammo. Yes, I'm serious.

-Name Withheld

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Round Up The Usual Suspects (And Register Your Blog)

Bloggers who criticize the government may soon face arrest and imprisonment. If I suddenly vanish from this web site, you'll know I'm down catching the rays in Guantanamo.

Look, I think we all know that the government has had wet dreams about shutting down the internet as an effective medium of opposition for some time. They keep probing and probing, floating little trial balloons to see what they can get away with, such things as a postal fee for e-mails and revoking internet service providers' common carrier status.

The latest attempt to silence web sites like Thoughtcrime comes in the guise of a restriction on "lobbying." According to GrassrootsFreedom.com, a website dedicated to fighting efforts to silence grassroots movements: "Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before the Senate, would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters, to register and report quarterly to Congress, the same as the big K Street lobbyists. Section 220 would amend existing lobbying reporting law by creating the most expansive intrusion on First Amendment rights ever. For the first time in history, critics of Congress will need to register and report with Congress itself."

"Communicates to members of the public on policy matters?" I think that used to be called freedom of speech, but now apparently it's "lobbying," and will be subject to the mountains of red tape which real lobbyists have to go through. (For all the good it does in controlling their corruption, bribery, and other misbehavior.) Any lobbyist who fails to keep his paperwork in order and who "knowingly and willingly fails to file or report" every three months with the Federal government faces prosecution and up to a year in jail, not to mention heavy fines and the seizure of assets (including computers) to pay those fines.

According to the Infowars web site (a site which would probably be shut down very quickly if this law passes) "This latest attack on bloggers comes hot on the heels of Republican Senator John McCain's proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. McCain's proposal is presented under the banner of saving children from sexual predators and encourages informants to shop website owners to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, who then pass the information on to the relevant police authorities."

Another part of the regime's hidden agenda has always been somehow to equate political dissent against diversity, multiculturalism, and government corruption with such things as child pornography and child molestation, including creating a "hate registry" and forcing dissidents to register as "hate offenders."

Infowars goes on" "Despite a total lack of any evidence that children are being victimized en mass by bloggers or people who leave comments on blog sites, it seems likely that the proposal will become legislation in some form. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned. In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs. During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an adversarial and ugly climate."

This is another liberal shibboleth, that "creating a hostile climate or environment" in the workplace or elsewhere is somehow a criminal offense.

In a recent speech, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a 'terror training camp,' through which 'disaffected people living in the United States' [that's us, folks!] are developing 'radical ideologies and potentially violent skills.' Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool."

A political tool like Thoughtcrime, for example?

Friday, February 16, 2007

Coming Home, For Real

Dear HAC:

I guess I'm a slow learner.

I spent 4 years at Duke, working my ass off to prepare to apply to medical school. Then, after a period of major burnout, I decided to pursue laboratory research instead. I've always loved science, and I accumulated three years of research experience as an undergrad, which culminated in the publication of three papers in major scientific journals (I'm happy to send the links to anyone who wants them).

So, after graduating, I spent 3 months looking for research jobs in the pharmaceutical sector. I searched all over North Carolina, and interviewed repeatedly, but alas, I have nothing to show for all my work. Or, for that matter, the incredible amount of work I put into graduating with a 3.6 GPA as a Duke Biology major.

After all this work, all this toil and sacrifice and all the money spent by myself and my father, I have absolutely nothing to show for it. I can say without reservation that these past 5 years have been the worst 5 years of my life. I should have gone to a state school. It would have been a hell of a lot easier, and it would have saved my family about $150,000.

After all this, I'm working as a Papa John's delivery driver at $6.10/hr. And, to add insult to injury, I've yet to meet a single person here who could qualify as a reliable and trustworthy friend. Duke is riddled with leftist academic ignoramuses, and Durham is chock full of coke and heroin addicts. This place is a rotten shithole, and I don't know how I've managed to stay as long as I have.

But on the upside, my apartment lease is up on May 31st, at which point I am packing up a U-Haul and heading west. I plan to dump my stuff in a storage unit and stay with my mother in Salt Lake for a couple of months, after which I am moving to the Northwest. Portland is high on my list right now. I mean seriously, I don't know why no one wants to get up there. There are both beaches and *year-round* ski resorts within a 2-hour drive. There are tons of areas to bike and hike, as well as docks for boats and jet-skis. The summers are temperate, and you can always drive inland to get away from the winter rain.

North Carolina has brought me nothing but pain. I have cried myself to sleep way too many times because of this place. No more. I'm coming home, Harold... and I'm dead fucking serious about it.

-Clay

P.S. Feel free to include all parts of this email... I don't give a fuck if there IS some federal scumbag reading it.


Thursday, February 15, 2007

A Lynching In Mannheim

Mannheim (Germany) February 15, 2007 - Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen today imposed a five year prison term on kidnapped historian, researcher and human rights activist Ernst Zündel for Holocaust denial.

Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen, who at every point during the proceedings deprived Ernst Zündel of his basic human right to defend himself with documentary and forensic evidence, behaved very oddly during the show trial's proceedings. The judge actually seemed at times to be guilty of Holocaust denial himself, as defined by the deranged German penal code.

On January 12, 2007, Meinerzhagen conceded with regret that no forensic reports existed to prove the Holocaust gas chambers. Scholars have gone to prison in Germany before for saying and writing less than that.

On February 2, 2007, Meinerzhagen declared that the precise numbers of alleged Holocaust "victims" could never be established, which is odd, given the oficial figure of six million which has been drummed into our ears over the generations.

On February 9, 2007 Meinerzhagen declared that the "victims" of the Holcaust amounted to one million, thus "minimizing" the Holocaust and denying the official figure of six million dad Jews.

Also on February 9, 2007, Meinerzhagen confirmed that in cases under the infamous Paragraph 130 of the German Penal Code on Holocaust denial, evidence in favor of the defendant was not permitted. ("Beweisverbot") Neither was the defendant allowed a trial by jury.

Ernst Zündel himself commissioned the first forensic report on the so-called gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek - later known as the Leuchter Report. Thus, when Zündel claimed that no gas chambers for mass extermination in Auschwitz ever existed, he referred to existing forensic evidence. Despite the fact that the court could not provide any forensic expertise proving that the so-called gas chambers existed, Judge Meinerzhagen refused to allow The Leuchter Report to to back Zündel's arguments as evidence.

Depite the fact that Judge Meinerzhagen claimed that the total number of "victims" of this mythical event amounted to one million (thus denying five of the required six million) and that the real numbers of "victims" could never be established anyway, he convicted Ernst Zündel for minimizing and denying the Holocaust.

Curiosity question: does Meinerzhagen's persistent and odd reference to one million "victims" instead of the hitherto de rigeur six million signal an Orwellian "rectification" of the figures on the part of the Holocaust industry? Could it be that Revisionism is finally making such a dent that the industry is having to quietly flush some of its more bizarre and outrageous claims down the Memory Hole?

Also, for non-Germans, I would like to point out that in Germany "Meinerzhagen" is generally recognized as a Jewish name, just like Cohen and Greenbaum would be over here. Apparently, Iraq isn't the only country that believes in "trials" which simply hand a scapegoated person over to their tribal enemies for "justice."





Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Dr. Tom Radio Show

For those of you interested in an Eastern European viewpoint, check out Dr. Tom Sunic on internet radio, February 16th at 7 PM Central Time and again on Saturday, February 17, at 2 AM. Dr. Tom will be speaking from Zagreb on the topic of "Dangers of Multiculturalism USA- Yugoslavia".

http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/index.php

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

A Statuesque Distraction

I'm starting to wonder if Anna Nicole Smith wasn't whacked out by order of the neocons, so that her bizarre death and the grotesque danse macabre around her estate and her baby could serve as a massive distraction for our bird-brained "public" while Jug-Ears and his buddies work up their unprovoked attack against Iran.

At a time when the entire attention span of the nation, as far as it goes (and that ain't very far) should be focused on Bush and his little Jewish friends and their deranged plot to destroy civilization as we know it by cutting off the West's fuel supply to save Israel, instead we will all be glued to the eight-chinned Nancy Grace babbling about Anna Nicole and the machinations of her Jew lawyer and "companion," Howard K. Stern.

We deserve every bit of misery and humiliation we get.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Aryan Movie List

In our regular weekly chat last night, we got to talking about movies, and which ones are of any worth at all, a very small list as you can imagine. This is the list we've come up with so far. Remember, none of these films except Birth of a Nation and Triumph of the Will are ideologically perfect. They do, after all, come out of Hollywood. The following is a suggested list of flicks that have something of racial or moral significance to say to us, buried deep under all the Hollywood crap and propaganda.

These are the ones we have come up with so far, in alphabetical order:

Alvarez Kelly*
Birth of a Nation
Braveheart
Dr. Zhivago
Excalibur
Gone With The Wind
Lord of the Rings
Michael Collins (!!!)
Miller's Crossing**
Red Dawn
Rob Roy
Soylent Green
The 13th Warrior
The Blue Max
The Hunley
The Naked Prey
The Outlaw Josey Wales
The Searchers
The Shootist
The Summer Of My German Soldier***
They Live! (A bit esoteric, but I get it.)
Triumph of the Will
Wagner
Zulu

Special Category: War movies that need about five minutes of anti-Nazi or anti-Confederate propaganda crap deleted, and then they'd be great flicks.

Cross of Iron
Das Boot (English or German)
Ride With The Devil (whole "black Confederate" character can and should be deleted, then great stuff!)
The Eagle Has Landed

Maybes: (Good flicks, but seem to be missing key racial or other element)
Mad Max
The Wild Bunch****
Bladerunner (?)

Any more suggested additions?

-HAC

*Never saw this myself, but will take Wagner's word on it.
**Possibly the most blatantly anti-Jewish successful film ever made by Hollywood.
***Dr. Goebbels could have done this one, but it seems to have disappeared. I can't find it anywhere.
****IMHO disfigured by "good Mexican" character, but great flick nonetheless.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

An Apology To The Black Man

(The following was written by Arthur Kemp, a White South African, but it is equally applicable to the racial situation here in North America. I publish it here in honor of Black History Month. - HAC)

An Apology To The Black Man From The White Race

We apologize for giving you doctors and free medical care, as a result of which you have been able to survive plagues and catastrophes and grow in numbers;

We apologize for teaching you to read and write, and for building you thousands of schools which we have repaired after you vandalized them and burned them down. After all, if you could not read, how could you have learned the words of Karl Marx, Mao Tse-tung, and others who taught you how evil we are and how oppressed you are?

We apologize for building factories and highways and buildings that gave you employment;

We apologize for developing farms which to this day feed the bulk of Africa;

We apologize for providing you with warm clothing made of fabric instead of leaving you wearing the animal skins which you wore before our arrival;

We apologize for taking minerals from the earth which you neither used, nor wanted, nor even knew were there;

We apologize for those among us who have established welfare organizations and have devoted their entire life towards making life richer and better for your people;

We apologize that we have built roads and railroad tracks between towns and cities which you now use every day without thinking;

We apologize for paying the lion's share of taxation while spending less on ourselves than on you;

We apologize for giving you law and order and a strong central government which prevented your own warrior nations like the Zulu and the Matabele from slaughtering black people by the hundreds of thousands as they did, year in and year out, before we came;

We apologize for teaching you the English language which has opened to you the entire world of European thought, culture, and commerce;

For all these sins we humbly beg forgiveness, and if you will only accept our apology we will be happy to take back all of the above evil and horrible things we have done to you and return to our European homeland.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Anna Nicole & Marilyn

The idiot media are now comparing Anna Nicole Smith to Marilyn Monroe.

Why? Was Anna Nicole murdered by the Kennedies as well?

Friday, February 09, 2007

More On Peak Oil

Dear HAC:

Interesting developments are afoot.

On Thursday, Feb. 1, Matthew Simmons, a well-known investment banker in oil, appeared on Bloomberg financial and stated that peak oil had occurred - and that we'd be hearing as much about peak oil over the next two years as we're presently hearing about global warming.

Notice, too, that corn - used to produce ethanol for fuel - is up. So much so that the price of tortillas in Mexico are up about 400%. Last week there was a news item that some 75,000 Mexican nationals were protesting the increased costs.

I think it would be wise for us to prepare for significantly higher food prices here in the U.S.

Also, in the Wall Street Journal, a news item came across that the Cantarell oil field is in sharp decline. Mexico gets about 38% of their national budget from PEMEX - and the revenues are down. Expect them to go down more.

Notice, too, that OPEC (Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc.) are scaling back production. Some believe (but cannot prove) that the big fields in the Middle East have also peaked.

What does this mean? Purely in my opinion, and with lots of caveats, I believe we should expect:

1) Much higher fuel prices over the next few years.

2) Significantly higher prices for food, especially meats (due to the use of corn as food for cattle, chickens, and hogs).

3) A growing flood of illegal immigrants from Mexico and points south

4) Possibly increased political instability in Mexico

My conclusion? This is a really good time to get to know one's neighbors.

-Claudius

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Another Horrible "Holocaust Denial" In Italy

by Professor Renato Pallavidini

These are the facts as they happened in class I E, 26 January of the current year, which have caused a public controversy in the last two days: In class I never expressed any political opinions, especially on the question of the Middle East, because I knew from the beginning that one of the students was the daughter of Elena Loewenthal who writes for the Turin newspaper La Stampa, a well-known Zionist who has justified quite unequivocally the Israeli aggression against Lebanon.

As soon as I entered the classroom, at 8 o'clock, a female student asked me, in a non-confrontational way, why I never celebrated the Day of (Holocaust) Memory in my class. After having tried for a moment to avoid the discussion, I stated that I considered that it was being exploited to justify the aggressive policy by the State of Israel in the Middle East. I did not plan to continue talking on the subject, which I had perceived as being very delicate in the class in question.

But after being questioned again by two students, I couldn't refreain from affirming that the recent Israeli bombing of Lebanon was the dirtiest trick played by the government of Tel Aviv, that Hezbollah, far from being a terrorist organization, was a people's partisan-army that had stopped the Israeli army on the ground, and that the Iranian president was right (without my alluding in the least to his views on the Holocaust, which I don't share; rather alluding in general to his anti-imperialistic policy, which has led him to seek meeting with President Chavez).

I then ended the discussion (which had lasted no longer than 10 minutes), and went on with the day's lesson.

Monday at 2 o'clock the principal sent for me to make the families' [of the students] "indignation" known to me; then in the afternoon, like a time bomb, I was subjected to a bombardment of telephone calls by journalists, and the mass media can-can with which you are familar had begun.

Within the next 72 hours, the Board of Education got into the act, and tomorrow, thursday 1 February, I will be interrogated by an inspector....

-Prof. Renato Pallavidini - 31/1/2007

Bush's Last Stand Begins

Damn! Another copter shot down in Iraq, making six in the past three weeks! Iranian secret weapons or not, Hadji Reb really seems to be getting his act together, whirlybird-wise.

This one was a mercenary chopper. It was shot down on January 31st but the news wasn't released until today. This brings up an interesting question viz. the cooked official casualty figures.

Officially the Iraq toll is now about 3200 dead Americans and about 30,000 wounded, many of them badly mangled and crippled for life, but those figures don't include the "security contractors," i.e. mercenaries, nor to they include other actual contractors such as truck drivers, engineers, oil company personnel, do-gooders like the tragic Marla Hrzicka who really wanted to help and got caught in the crossfire, etc. Almost a hundred journalists from all nations have been killed as well. So what is the real American and "Allied" body count in Iraq? Is anyone even figuring it up?

In the meantime, Moqtada Al-Sadr has made it clear how he's going to fight Jug-Ears' "surge"--he isn't. His Mahdi Army is going to ground; they have almost completely disappeared from Sadr City now, merging into the millions of Shiites in the capital, their Kalashnikovs neatly stashed away, and most known Sadrist officers and leaders have become "unavailable."

Al-Sadr is following the first rule of guerrilla warfare: maintain your command intact and never expend your precious manpower in pointless and bloody frontal assaults against the occupation forces. He's going to let the Americans do his sectarian civil war work for him and tussle with the Sunnis, who are now completely irreconcilable since the ghastly judicial murder of Iraq's last native ruler, Saddam Hussein.

The Imperial forces are going to be pretty frazzled by the time Jug finally picks his fight with Iran and (IMHO) the million-man Iranian army and Revolutionary Guards come storming across the border to seize the Basra oil fields and hammer at the exhausted, demoralized, poorly trained and incompetently-led U.S. and British forces.

At which point the majority Shi'ite population of Iraq will join in the so far mostly Sunni insurgency against the American occupation. In addition to a million fanatical, fresh, and well-armed Persian troops in front of them, the Americans will have hundreds of thousands of battle-hardened militiamen and guerrillas behind them and all around them. They will as well be facing a completely hostile population, a vastly extended and vulnerable supply line, a commander-in-chief who hasn't had all his marbles for some time, an American people who are finally understanding that we have been deceived and betrayed by democracy, and a world that hates and despises us.

Back in 1876, at least Custer let his own troops down the Little Big Horn and died with them.


Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Here We Go...

Let me guess. Those five helicopters that were shot down in Iraq in the past week were all shot down by Iranian secret agents or possibly by Iranian secret weapons which were smuggled in to the Iraqi rebels. Right? So the United States just absolutely must attack Iran and start dropping bombs on people NOW NOW NOW, right?

And of course, Jug-ears has no need to go to Congress before ending civilization as we know it, because this is all part of the Iraq thing and that's covered by the same "resolution" passed by those 535 yea-saying leeches four years ago, right?

Jesus Christ! Do those nitwits in the White House really think we're that stupid?

Yeah, I know, we are, but damn it all, Jug shouldn't rub our noses in it like this.

Or else the Jews and the neocons are just not even trying to cover their tracks any more, because they know damned well that no one in this country has the balls to do anything about them.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

A Cult of Failure

I like the phrase Dennis Mahon came up with during one of our conversations about this thing of ours. He called us a "cult of failure." About sums it up. I've ceased arguing with these characters. Some would be better off investing in a good dominatrix or something, & dropping the pretense of being in anything political.

It should be noted, that it isn't just NW migration the pretenders freak out on. It's any plan, proposal, agenda, that is realistic, achievable, grounded in this world, postive & upbeat. Learned that the past few years with what we're doing.

I'm fortunate in that most of these characters don't seem to want to bother me any more with their perpetual whine & cry bullshit. Lost count of the times when some one of these lets pretenders, these cult of failure adherents, would begin to lecture me (or now, someone with our association, LibRA), on how we supposedly can't do what we've already done. Have learned those who are relatively new, with little to no Movement involvement, whose attitudes haven't been spoiled, retain enough gumption, enough ambition & positive outlook, to get involved in perfectly legal projects, jump right in.

We've had people write to prison officials & other officials about one matter or another, which helped apply pressure to bring more favorable results. Of course, they approached these people in a responsible, professional manner, not some kooky off the wall type. So, it can be done. Indeed, it has to be done on some things.

As for NW migration, those who go who work with us, well, valuable experience because at some point in time, we will have to have people get involved with the local people where they are moving to.

-John W. Gerhardt

Speaking of Things European

Some of our ex-Yugoslav comrades asked me to forward this:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/905791187?ltl=1170750467

I must admit that stunt Billyboy pulled by attacking Serbia always left a bad taste in my mouth. The only real result seems to have been to hand Europe's illegal drug trade over to the Albanian Mob.

Monday, February 05, 2007

Northwest Trilogy Web Site

Hi, guys:

There is a new Northwest Trilogy web site up at

http://www.bocker.14ord.com/

I have a lot of fans in Europe. Europeans seem to get it on the Northwest so much better than Americans do.

88!
HAC

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Jews and Slavery

One of the most pernicious of all historical myths about America's past, and one which has done possibly more damage than any other, is the historically incorrect idea that prior to 1865, black slavery was a monopoly of White Christians, something inflicted on the po' lil' innocent cullud folks by evil white Gentile males.

Now, of all people, a Jewish feminist historian named Natalie Zemon Davis has written a book on a subject which has up until now been strictly off limits to historians and scholars--Jews and their role in the slave trade and in slave ownership.

Davis uses as her starting point the life and times of one Jewish physician who also made big bucks (or in his case, big guilders) in the slave trade during the 18th century, David Isaac Cohen Nassy, a resident and merchant prince of the Dutch colony in Surinam in South America, where tens of thousands of black African slaves lived and toiled in the sugar cane fields and the steaming, fever and snake-infested jungles under conditions that made a plantation in Virginia or domestic service in Massachusetts look like paradise.

According to an article in the Jewish Forward, the largest and most prestigious Jewish newspaper in America, "...Nassy was not an anomaly. Of the hundreds of Portuguese and Dutch settlers who traveled to the small plot of land just north of Brazil, almost a third were Jewish. And almost all had slaves. Surinam provided a choice example to exhibit this intermixing — if not for the abundant paper trail that Nassy left behind, then for the sheer exoticism of the place...Sephardic Jews from Portugal had lived on the land and were some of the colony’s first owners of slave-run sugar plantations. By the early 18th century, when Nassy lived...Jews were also granted autonomy and maintained their own legal system and militia, whose largest task involved capturing runaway slaves called maroons."

In other words, the Dutch colonial authorities contracted the lucrative racket of "slave-catching" to the Jews.

The connection between Jews and slavery was known even prior to the Civil War, and it is interesting to note that the Jews, as always, were on the side that could make them the quickest buck. One of the major advocates of slavery in the South was "Major" Mordecai Manuel Noah (1785-1851.) He was considered the most distinguished Jewish layman in his time. He was such a prolific proponent of slavery, that the first negro periodical, the Freedom Journal, was launched in response to Noah's activities, including "To emancipate the slaves would be to jeopardize the safety of the whole country."

The Freedom Journal called Noah the black man's "bitterest enemy" and William Lloyd Garrison, the leading White abolitionist, called him the "lineal descendant of the monsters who nailed Jesus to the cross." (From the banned book The Secret History of Blacks and Jews, http://www.blacksandjews.com/books.html )

The annual Report of the American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society for the year 1853 stated: The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society Report of 1853 "The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have every one choose which ever side he may deem best to promote his own interests and the welfare of his country. They have no organization of an ecclesiastical body to represent their general views; no General Assembly, or its equivalent. The American Jews have two newspapers, but they do not interfere in any discussion which is not material to their religion. It cannot be said that the Jews have formed any denominational opinion on the subject of American slavery....The objects of so much mean prejudice and unrighteous oppression as the Jews have been for ages, surely they, it would seem, more than any other denomination, ought to be the enemies of caste, and friends of universal freedom."

Jewish attorney and historian Seymour B. Liebman has written: "They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale....[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise....The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains." [New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183.]

Essentially, the infamous "Middle Passage" was largely a Jewish racket. The Jews owned the ships and Liebman notwithstanding, it was assorted Gentiles sailed in them and took all the risks from storms, African tribesmen, slave revolts on board, and the terrible fevers of the disease-ridden West African tropics.

(Come on now. How many Jewish sea captains and sailors were there in the 18th and 19th centuries? Really?)

The Jews handled the sale once the negroes had arrived in the Americas, usually the West Indies or Cuba or Surinam or Brazil. (The actual importation of blacks right off the boat from Africa into the thirteen British colonies was comparatively rare; most American slaves came from Cuba or the West Indies and had already been slaves for several generations when they arrived here. Importation of foreign slaves into the United States was outlawed by Congress in 1808.)

I wonder if people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton really know who the ancestors of all their smart Jewish lawyers were?

Saturday, February 03, 2007

The Ould Sod Awakes

And here I was thinking there was virtually no identifiable right wing or racial nationalist politics in Ireland!

http://www.immigrationcontrol.org/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whiteireland

http://theirishbulletin.blogspot.com/

Many thanks to Comrade Michael McNally for pointing these out to me.

Friday, February 02, 2007

Comments from Scott

[A few days ago I routinely re-circulated one of my older articles to the list to bring newbs up to date. This is a response I got. My comments are in black, Scott's in red. - HAC]

"Growing out of this sense of hopeless defeatism, there is also (they think) some kind of tacit agreement we have with ZOG. The Pauls among us know in their hearts that they don't really mean it, and they think ZOG knows and accepts that as well and so will refrain from crushing us, so long as we don't rock the boat."

This is true. There's something called "blowing off steam" referred to in legal precedents regarding the First Amendment and hatespeech."The idea is that if we are allowed to burn crosses, publish your books, bitch about it a lot, etc. then - as long as it doesn't incite violence or violate time, place, and manner restrictions - it allows us to vent and helps defuse us from potential violence. And it seems to be working.

"Barefoot Iraqis with nothing but an AK-47 and a couple of magazines can fight against ZOG. We can't, apparently."

Yes. We are not ready to die, they are. They are fearless because of their belief in afterlife, their rage toward the invaders, and their non-materialistic philosophy. Americans (Westerners in general) value everything that we have - all the money, the food, the physical comfort,and every other earthly thing we enjoy. When we have everything we value, including the respect of the community (which is why we hide our beliefs for the most part), why should we want anarchy and disruption or loss of all those things? America is number one in the world for "individualistic"attitudes about living. Western Europe is not far behind. We don't any longer care about others in our communities and if that's the case, why in the hell should we worry about those who come after us? Race certainly isn't important. We care about ourselves, and that's it. That's the difference between us and the Iraqis or the other Muslims.

"We're just going to do like our own grandfathers and fathers did, sit back, enjoy the ride as much as we can, and let our own children and grandchildren fend for themselves."

Exactly.

"Because, you see, if we can bring ourselves collectively to commit this one physical act [Northwest Migration] instead of responding to the threat with nothing but words...what act might we contemplate next?"

Well, if we're in the same area, it builds a sense of community - something we lack for the most part. When there's comraderie, there's a better chance that we might get prepared for the coming dissolution of America and carve out our own place from the remnants. Research shows that people achieve more when they are all working toward a common goal - the principle in National Socialism. They also perform better and achieve more when they are positively reinforced for accomplishments and punished for poor performance.

If we could convince people that America is finished, we could probably gain a lot more support. Right now they are still hoping, but not for long. We really need a plan for the coming crisis. When the shit hits, that's not the time to be figuring out what to do. I don't know how much time there is, but it can't be long. This nation could come apart for example if a jihadist nuke goes off in some city, or when the civil war with the Mexicans starts, or when the oil gets cut off, or when China does something. Now is the time to prepare - and you have me finally convinced that we must at least be in the same vicinity when it all comes down, preferably with a plan.

We're quite a sorry lot, but that can change if we can come together physically -
Sort of like the Hutterites in Montana - our own communities eventually.

Scott



Scott, folks, all of you--the ball is in your court. If you wait around for Harold to pull a rabbit out of a hat, if you hang around in Cincinnati or Florida or Texas or Wisconsin waiting for someone else to GO FIRST and do all the heavy lifting, then you're going to be waiting for a long time. But if you'll start packing the moving van and get with the program, now, then we can do this. It's perfectly legal, it's do-able, it is materially in the best interest of you and your family. (Why would anyone not want to come here? No one who has ever wants to leave.) And it's the only plan we've got.

I'm ready when you are.

- HAC

Thursday, February 01, 2007

God, I Hate Being Right All The Time

Sure enough, what's all over cable news today? "Iranian agents" are "killing Americans," the Pentagon is "reluctantly" (of course!) "declassifying secret intelligence data" (like the data on Saddam's non-existent weapons of mass destruction?) and "the President already has full authority to go into Iran via the Iraq resolution of 2003."

That last comes from "Bonkers" Bolton, the former ambassador to the United Nations who failed confirmation under the Republican Congress as well as the Democratic one because he was too nuts even for most neocons to stomach him. He was gibbering on---you guessed it--the Glenn Beck show, CNN's token apocalyptic lunatic. You know, the shift-eyed little weasel who comes on just before the eight-chinned ghoul Nancy Grace.

If by any chance there is ever any kind of war crimes tribunal set up to try these neocon bastards for their crimes against humanity, I personally think Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and these goddamned neocon talking heads off cable need to be standing in the dock in the orange jumpsuits with numbered placards on their chests alongside the rest. (Sigh....yeah, I know. Fat chance.)