Tuesday, October 30, 2007

That's Us, Folks!

Hi, guys:

These are the sections of H. R. 1955 that have relevance to our situation:

(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change. [Now, do we know anybody who would do such a horrid thing? Hmmm?]

(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. ["Planned" or "threatened use" probably covers the Northwest independence novels, or will be stretched to cover them.]

(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs. [Ditto the above.]

(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens. [You guys bette read and enjoy this blog while you still can. This time next year it might not be here.]

(8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents. ["We also have this lovely bridge in Brooklyn we'd like to sell you." This is window dressing, a verbal fig leaf to cover vile and brutal tyranny. In view of the track record of the Bush administration, it is not meant to be taken seriously, and everyone concerned knows it.]

It appears that if these were made into law during the founding of the United States, our Founding Fathers would be considered terrorists by their own country. Of course they were considered that by the British, but now U.S. citizens will be terrorists.

Folks, may I make a suggestion? Order any extra copies of my Northwest freedom novels that you feel you may need for the future, and do it right now. Once this thing passes, in my view there is a genuine possibility that there will be an attempt by the United States government to withdraw them from circulation, and maybe withdraw me from circulation as well.

-HAC

7 Comments:

Blogger Robert Redbeard said...

Choose your Weapon.

Choose your Ground.

Then fight them when they come!

10:57 AM  
Anonymous National Socialist said...

This is truly an excellent example of State control. Liberty? They must have the philosophy that they need to destroy the village in order to save it. but really this an effective vehicle thats really beginning to be put into use!

11:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's ironic is the fact that this administration is ALREADY guilty of all of the prohibited behavior they're trying to criminalize. In fact, almost every administration since the inception of the US has been guilty of this.

So . . . if this passes, should we "write our Congresspersons", urging them to impeach themselves, as well as the entire Executive and Judicial branches?

It's peculiar how the ones who scream the loudest against another's questionable actions are often the ones most guilty of those very actions. I guess we could read that this statute will apply "equally" to everyone - except the Jews. Just as their so-called "justice" is applied in their courts.

What I'm wondering is just exactly when is it that "White men" will have had enough of this and finally draw the line in the sand and say "this far, and no further"? Even the peaceful Hopi got to the point where they'd had enough of the conquistadors and literally drew a line in the sand.

The same theme was noted in two movies I watched recently - "Enemy at the Gates" and "Star Trek: First Contact". Each dealt with cultures threatened from without, having been pushed to the point were they HAD to fight as ferociously as they could to save themselves. Not that I favor the Soviets (God, no!), but the idea is the same here. The Jew-controlled governments are very much like the Borg. Only they don't want us to be assimilated, they want us for their slaves, to an even greater degree than we already are. And they LITERALLY want most, if not all of us, dead.

So when does White man get this through his thick skull and realize what's going on? When most of us are six feet under? When we're wearing literal chains around our feet doing the bidding of our masters? Does anybody realize what the UN's "Global 2000" plan was really about? They had planned our decimation back to something under 1 billion by that date. They even BOASTED about it on the stamps they put on the letters that went out from the UN. That they are now about 6-7 years behind schedule has been a blessing to us. But it won't last ery much longer if we sit back and do nothing in the time we've been given to prepare.

So when do we wake up and say to them "this far, and NO further"?

-D

1:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We all know that nobody has the guts to stand up and fight against any intolerable acts our government forces upon us. Who are we kidding ? Everyone among our tribe has accepted pacifism and laissez-faire philosophies.

2:25 PM  
Anonymous Jack said...

To expand on the notion that our nation's founding fathers could be considered terrorists based on the vague language of this bill, I would like to pose the following question. As a physical scientist I humbly ask of my fellow political scientists (or anyone with knowledge), does the Constitution in any way assert the right (duty?) of the citizenry to overthrow a despotic government? The Declaration of Independence of course provides the basis for the founding fathers doing so, but is posterity granted that right expressly? If so, then the very language of HR 1955 would be unconstitutional it seems to me.

And how does one "shake off the bonds of tyranny" without being guilty of sedition?

I humbly await replies.

5:22 PM  
Blogger Oxa Koba said...

8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents.

Number 8 is the part of the bill that will get a signing statement waiving the Executive Branch's responsibility to enforce it. Or rather, allowing the administration to enforce it is in the most ideologically violent way possible.

5:52 PM  
Anonymous Nordique said...

The Constitution was written with many loop-holes on purpose by the Freemason assholes who created it. It contradicts itself on many occasions just like all the other religious texts before it have done. Why do we fail to realize that our "Founding Fathers" were simply cult leaders which had been expelled from Britain and tossed to live with the rest of the degenerates on this continent? I hate to lump ALL North Americans into that category,but the majority truly descend from said explorers.

1:26 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home