Friday, August 31, 2007

Goodbye, Lady Di

(This is actual Classic HAC from ten years ago, by the way. Yeah, I know, I already ran this a few months back, but I actually forgot, because I never cared, that the tenth anniversary of her splatting was coming up. With simpering apologies to Elton John, thweetie. Thung to the tune of Candle in the Wind---this is the way Elton should have thung it in Wethminster Abbey.)

Goodbye, Lady Di,
Thought you were a...
Anorexic bimbo glitterati slut,
As useless as they come.
Never gave a damn,
Who you were cavorting with this week,
Or what you had to say,
You were just PC scum.

And it seems to me,
You lived your life
Like a faggot breaking wind,
Superficial and annoying,
With a shit-faced grin,
And I'm glad I never knew you.
When I was just a kid,
I'd really had enough of you,
The tabloids never did.

Goodbye Lady Di,
No more champagne suppers
At the Ritz with DooDoo What's-his-name,
And no more Dior gowns.
No more Concorde flights,
No more photo-ops for every trendy lefty
Cause in town,
No matter how inane.

And it seems to me
You lived your life
Like a faggot breaking wind,
Lousy wife and lousy mother,
PC heroine.
I'm just sorry for that chump you wed,
And for your kids,
The whole world saw much more of you,
Than your children ever did.

Goodbye Lady Di,
No more piccanins with AIDS
To hug before the camera crews,
And self-promote your name.
Even when you died,
The way you died was just as pointless as
The way you'd lived your life,
In interracial shame.

And it seems to me,
You've lived your life,
Like a faggot breaking wind,
When the most important thing of all
Was the media spin,
And when that drunken chauffeur
Went into his skid,
The candle splattered on concrete,
And damned high time it did!

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Why Not Repatriate?

[Some more Classic HAC for you.]

September 4th, 2005

House Majority leader Dennis Hastert has already floated a tentative trial balloon to the effect of: do we really need to rebuild New Orleans?

It's an interesting question. What, exactly, is there in New Orleans besides some architecturally interesting houses in the French Quarter, including the palazzo where Madame LaLaurie ruled her slaves with such an iron hand in the 1830s? (I'd love a ghost tour of that house! But I digress.)

Really, now, what do people go to New Orleans for? Largely to get drunk in the French Quarter, experiment with interracial and perverted sex, (there was a major "gay convention" scheduled for the French Quarter this week had not Katrina intervened) and generally to show their butts and act stupid.

The Big Easy is kind of a worldwide spring break, especially during Mardi Gras where for one week every stupid blond bimbo in every American college and university seems to go there so she can get hammered, take off her blouse and wave her titties off a balcony to the drunken mobs below, afterwhich she gets so drunk she does a few amateur lesbian porn videos with Jennifer and Dakota from her dorm, which end up on the internet and which (sometimes) her rich Daddy and his lawyer have to chase down and buy back from the Beavis and Butthead type geeks who made them. That's New Orleans.

There are some very overpriced bars on Bourbon Street, some funky black men in top hats playing the tuneless, cacophonic jazz that due to the jaded elites' fascination with negroes has somehow become classified as real music (it isn't); some equally funky black women pretending to be voodoo priestesses and selling bogus voodoo charms and bits and pieces of disgusting animal matter to the gullible tourists; and a lot of crime and violence as the huge majority of the city's negroid population preys on the White tourists and residents in various ways, with the help and connivance of the city's corrupt black-run government and all-negro police force.

New Orleans has long been almost as famous for its occasional black atrocities committed against White tourists as for its filet gumbo. It's common knowledge among the vacationing set that if one goes to New Orleans one is to at least some degree taking one's life in his hands; dicing with the Black Death seems to be part of the weird attraction of the place. As tourist traps go, the local Six Flags or Busch Gardens are more interesting, more fun, and a hell of a lot safer than New Orleans.

But now Mother Nature has presented America with an ideal chance to finally do some genuine urban renewal and clean up one of the festering, putrescent "black spots" which we have allowed to grow on the North American continent.

I propose two revolutionary steps that can, should, and (with a lot of window dressing and camouflage) maybe will be taken by the authorities responsible for recovering from Hurricane Katrina:

PROPOSAL ONE: Fine, rebuild New Orleans. Granted, it is part of our history, albeit largely a sleazy part. (Aleister Crowley wrote Moonchild in New Orleans, for example, and William Faulkner used to go there to strike a blow against Jim Crow by sodomizing black prostitutes and drinking himself into the alcoholic delirium tremens that eventually killed him. And don't even ask me about those octoroon balls in the 19th century.)

But rebuild only the French Quarter and the historic sections of the town, and the White residential areas like Metairie, etc. Reduce the city to a population of about 100,000 people, of which 75% will be White, with preference in housing given to native Cajuns and White immigrants from France or French Canada, in order to maintain the Gallic character of the city.

There is no need at all to re-create the filth and crime-infested housing projects or the row upon row of ugly, disease-ridden "shotgun shacks" whence come most of the 500,000 or so congoids who have been made homeless by the storm. Mother Nature has done what no one in authority in this country has had the guts to do for the past 100 years: she has done something about all those damned niggers!

Let's not look a gift horse in the mouth. Nature has shown us clearly that she does not want hundreds of thousands of monkoids cluttering up and befouling her nice clean swamp down there in Louisiana, uglier than the catfish and meaner than the snakes and gators. So let's finish what Mother Gaia has begun.

PROPOSAL TWO: Rather than disperse the hundreds of thousands of congoids all over this continent (and you can bet your bippy screaming liberals are going to try to send them to Iowa, Minnesota, Idaho, Vermont and any other remaining predominantly White areas in order that the hapless honkies may enjoy in full measure the benefits of "diversity")--I say, rather than load up the already groaning housing projects in Chicago, Houston, St. Louis, etc. and rather than ship these refugees out to some corn field in Iowa or some maple forest in Vermont in 25,000-nigger job lots--why not go ahead and do what we should have done in 1861 rather than slaughter one another by the hundred-thousand? Send them back to Africa!

Where? One of the things we have never been allowed to know is that there is an entire country in West Africa, called Liberia, which has been set aside for American black descendants of slaves since the year 1807, if memory serves. We could have sent them back any time since 1807. The Liberian society wants them there. Yet since our own liberal establishment wants them here, most blacks don't even know that Liberia exists. Never mind most Whites.

(Yes, it does exist! There really was country established two hundred years ago by Thomas Jefferson for the purpose of repatriating American blacks! Google Liberia if you don't believe me, dammit! I'm not making this up! )

But if Liberia is too far--why not Haiti? Haiti is the oldest black-ruled nation in the world, so our New Orleans homeys should feel quite at home. Not to mention the voodoo thing. And compared to Haitians, American blacks of any kind are reasonably skilled. In fact, Haitian niggers are probably the only people on earth more worthless than American blacks, so an infusion of New Orleans niggers would actually be an improvement.

We have an ideal chance now to un-do the greatest historic mistake this country ever made. We've got about half a million loose niggers lying around now. Rather than try and find someplace to sweep them under the rug over here, where we know they are simply going to do harm wherever they go, why not finally do the one honorable and decent thing we can do for them--admit that we made a mistake, admit that they shouldn't have been brought here in the first place, and send them back?

Would it really be all that much more expensive to load about four or five hundred thousand of these New Orleans refugees onto naval transports or C-130 aircraft and take them over to Monrovia, Liberia, which has a nice deep harbor dredged out, waiting for the repatriation ships that have never come?

Would it really not be better for everyone concerned in the long run if, instead of jamming all these blacks into housing projects like Cabrini Green in Chicago, already bursting at the seams, where there will be violence between Chicago niggers already there and New Orleans refugees, sure as the sun rises--or worse yet, may the liberals burn in hell for it, sending them into the few remaining livable White parts of the country--would it not be better if we went ahead, bit the bullet, let Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson scream all they wanted to (as they were dragged up the gangplank by two burly Polish Marines apiece) and went ahead and did what we all know damned well we have to do if we want to avoid unspeakable chaos and horror?

Look, we saw what these half million monkoids did to their own city when the restraint of law and authority was temporarily removed. What do we think they'll do to the areas we try to stash them in like so much toxic waste? Do we really want to dump these savages in Vermont or Iowa and unleash them on the poor white bastards living there?

The black man in America is an experiment which has lasted for four hundred years, and he has failed. There is no reason for the black man to be in America at all. He has been obsolete since the invention of the cotton-picker at the beginning of the last century. What manual labor he provided was always done faster, cheaper, and better in the past by the horse and the mule, and is done faster, cheaper, and better today by the Mexican. We just don't need the black man any more.

We are learning from the New Orleans experience that when needs must, it is in fact possible to shift large populations of blacks here, there, and everywhere. Okay, it hasn't done very efficiently so far, but hey, we're new at this nigger-relocating business. We can get the hang of it, if we want to.

Instead of moving all these New Orleans coons to Chicago or dumping them in Dog Doo, Texas or throwing them in with the Crips and Bloods in L.A. and seeing who kills who--why not just do the humane thing, the right thing, the thing that is best for everybody, and send them back?

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

More Wisdom of the Ancients

"The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you."

-Polish proverb

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Fred on Reparations

Slavery Reparations
by Fred Reed

I find that Henry Louis Gates, Jr., the chairman of Afro-American Studies at Harvard, is demanding that whites pay reparations to blacks. It's because of slavery, see. He is joined in this endeavor by a gaggle of other professional blacks.

I guess he'll send me a bill, huh? I feel like saying, "Let me get this straight, Hank. I'm slow. Be patient. You want free money because ofslavery, right? I don't blame you. I'd like free money too. Tell you what. I believe in justice. I'll give you a million dollars for every slave I own, and another million for every year you were a slave. Fair enough? But tell me, how many slaves do you suppose I have? In round numbers, I mean. Say to the nearest dozen. And exactly how long were you a slave?"


In other words, I owe you reparations for something that I didn't do, and that didn't happen to you. That makes sense. Like lug nuts on a birthday cake.

Personally, I think you owe me reparations for things you didn't do and never happened to me. I've never been coated in Dutch chocolate and thrown from the Eiffel Tower. I'll bet you've never done it to anyone. But I want reparations. Kinda silly, isn't it?

But if we're going to talk about reparations, that's a street that runs in two directions. You want money from me for what some other whites did to some other blacks in another century. How about you guys paying whites reparations for current expenses caused by blacks? Not long ago blacks burned down half of Los Angeles, a city in my country. Cities are expensive, Hank. Build one sometime and you'll see what I mean. Whites had to pay taxes to repair Los Angeles for you.

You can send me a check.

Now, yes, I know you burned L.A. because you didn't like the verdict in the trial of those police officers. Well, I didn't like the verdict in the Simpson trial. But I didn't burn my house and loot Korean grocers.

Over the years blacks have burned a lot of American cities: Newark, Detroit, Watts, on and on. Now add in the fantastic cost over the years of welfare in all its forms, of large police forces and jails and security systems in department stores. I can't live in the capital city of my own country because of crime committed by blacks. Toss in the cultural cost of lowering standards in everything for the benefit of blacks. See what I mean?

Now, I'd view things differently if you said, "Fred, blacks can't get anywhere in a modern country without education. We know that. We need better schools, smarter teachers, harder courses, books with smaller pictures and bigger words. Can you help us?"

I'd say, "Hallelujah! Hoo-ahh! Not just yes, but hell yes. Let's sell an aircraft carrier and get these folks some real schools and get them into the economic mainstream." I'd say it partly because it would be the right thing to do, and partly, because I'd like to add you guys to the tax base. The current custodial state is expensive. I'd just love for blacks tos tudy and learn to compete and stop burning places.

But is it going to happen?

You may not believe it, but I, and most whites, don't like seeing blacks as miserable and screwed up as they are. I spend a fair amount of time in the projects. Those places are ugly. It's no fun watching perfectly good kids turn into semiliterate dope dealers, who barely speak English. It just plain ain't right. But, Hank, what am I supposed to do about it? I can't do your children's homework. At some point, people have to do things for themselves, or they don't get done. Maybe it's time.

I'll tell you what I see out in the world, Hank. I think blacks are too accustomed to getting anything they want by just demanding it. True, it has worked for over half a century. Get a few hundred people in the street, implicitly threaten to loot and burn, holler about slavery, and the Great White Cash Spigot turns on.

Thing is, whites don't much buy it any longer. Most recognize that what once was a civil-rights movement has become a shakedown game. Few people still feel responsible for the failings and inadequacies of blacks.

Political correctness keeps the lid on -- but everyone knows the score. Which scares me, Hank. On one hand, blacks hate whites and incline toward looting and burning. (The whites you hate are the ones who marched in the civil-rights movement. Ever think about that?) On the other hand, whites quietly grow wearier and wearier of it. Not good.

On the third hand (allow me three hands, for rhetorical convenience), blacks keep demanding things. As I write, you demand reparations for slavery. Blacks in Oklahoma (I think it was) want money for some ancient race riot. Other blacks reject the Declaration of Independence, blacks in New York hint broadly at burning and looting over a trial, yet more demand the elimination of the Confederate flag, and the federal equal opportunity apparatus, which means blacks, wants to sue Silicon Valley for not hiring nonexistent black engineers. That's a lot of demanding for one month, Hank. What happens if whites ever say, no?

Now, how about you? You've got a cushy job up there at Harvard, and you can hoot and holler about what swine and bandits whites are. I guess it's lots of fun, and you get a salary for it. But don't you think you might do blacks more good if you told them to complain less and study more? For example, if you want blacks to work in Silicon Gulch, the best approach might be to find some really smart black guys, and get them tostudy digital design, not Black Studies.

That's how everybody else does it. It works. Then blacks wouldn't feel left out, and racial tension would decline. Sound like a plan?

Just out of curiosity, how many hours a week do professors of Afro-American Studies spend in the projects, encouraging poor black kids to study real subjects, Hank?

Monday, August 27, 2007

Albert Schweitzer on Niggers

"I have given my life to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all White men who have lived here like I have must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the mental or emotional abilities to equate or share equally with White men in any functions of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring unto them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: White the superior, and they the inferior. For whenever a White man seeks to live among them as their equals, they will destroy and devour him, and they will destroy all his work. And so for any existing relationship or any benefit to this people, let White men, from anywhere in the world, who would come to help Africa, remember that you must maintain this status: you the master and they the inferior, like children whom you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you."

-Dr. Albert Schweitzer

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Who Is George Lincoln Rockwell?

[Today is the 40th anniversary of the Commander's death. - HAC]

George Lincoln Rockwell was born in Bloomington, Illinois, in the home of his maternal grandfather, on March 9, 1918. His father was a very successful headline comedian from 1912 until about 1935. His ancestors were German, French, English, and Scotch, numbering among them many Revolutionary War figures and going back to Marie Antoinette, the French Queen.

Rockwell stayed in Bloomington, Illinois, only until he was old enough to get out of the hospital, when he was taken on the vaudeville circuit by his parents. He then spent some time in New Jersey, New York, and California, but most of his youthn was spent in Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

He attended Hebron Academy, a prep school near Lewiston, Maine after which he entered Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, majoring in philosophy. In college, Rockwell enjoyed and did well in the sciences and other objective courses, but fought blindly and instinctively against the "sociology" and other similar departments which, unknown to him, were then preaching the Marxist environmentalism and equalism which has played such havoc with our human, biological sciences.

Leaving Brown in the middle of his junior year in 1940, when it became obvious that the U.S. would get into World War Two, Rockwell enlisted as a seaman in the United States Navy in Boston, Massachusetts. By the outbreak of World War Two on December 7, 1941 he had entered naval aviation, and became a scout pilot and a fighter pilot. He served aboard the U. S. S. Omaha in the South Atlantic and off North Africa during the invasion. He was then sent to the Naval Photographic School for pilots and assigned to the U.S.S. Wasp, and from there went to the Pacific theater. He became a Commander of Forward Air Control Operations for Marine Corps assault troops. He was at Guadalcanal, Guam, and other Pacific hot spots. At the end of World War II he was commanding officer of a squadron in Hawaii, earning nine decorations.

Released from active duty, Rockwell attended Pratt Institute art school in New York, working part time in advertising and commercial art. In 1948, while still at Pratt, he won first prize of $1,000 in the National Society of Illustrators competition for a full page newspaper ad for the American Cancer Society. Although still in the ready reserves as Commanding Officer of a squadron in Washington, D.C. he launched a new magazine, U. S. Lady, for the wives of U. S. service men. In 1949, Rockwell founded the first big national advertising agency in the state of Maine. Recalled for the Korean War in 1950, he trained Marine and Navy pilots in close support of troops and then was transferred to Iceland, where he became commanding officer of a squadron at Keflavik.

At about this time he became deeply concerned about the way all he had fought for in two wars was being turned over to Communism. He noticed that almost all of the convicted Communist spies and traitors such as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Nathan Silvermaster, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), Robert Soblen, Morton Sobell, David Greenglass, Judith Coplon, Harry Gold, Miriam Moskowitz, Fred Rosenberg, and Sam Cohen (chief Communist spies caught in Canada) and most of the Communist intellectual leaders such as Herbert and Bettina Aptheker, were racial Jews. He was especially shocked to find that "Who's Who In World Jewry", published b the Jews themselves, listed many of these atheist Communists very proudly as Jews, even though Rockwell then believed Jews were just a religion.

Observing that Hitler had said that Communism was Jewish, and that the Jews were out to degenerate and conquer the White race by subversion and race-mixing, Rockwell bought a copy of Mein Kempf and read it, even though he thought he already knew what was in it from all he'd heard. He was astounded to find that it was actually a brilliant analysis of the mess Western Civilization had gotten into, and the only plan he'd ever seen for the White race to save itself.

For a number of years, he tried to work with various "right wing" organizations, all of whom believed, as he did for a while, that it was necessary to disguise one's belief in Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. Finally disgusted with the emptiness, the weakness, the hypocrisy and especially the cowardice of the so-called "conservatives," Rockwell determined to attack at last, flying the Swastika banner which had come so close to saving Western civilization and the White race.

"Since our Cause is fundamentally the truth," he explained to horrified friends, "I do not see how we can win by lying or misrepresenting what we are for fear of the Jews.The only time in the hundred years of the rise of Communism that this plague has ever actually been beaten it was beaten not by 'conservatives' but by radicals and fighters whom the enemy called Nazis and Fascists and whom they really did fear. Only in Germany, Spain and Italy has Communism ever been conquered. We are damned fools to be afraid to follow the only examples that ever worked!"

He hung up a Nazi banner in front of his home and dared the Jews to do something about it. They---and their friends and dupes---came in droves and mobs to do something about it, but Rockwell survived all the shooting, the rocks and other Jewish "arguments". The publicity gave him a much-needed platform from which to call the attention of his fellow Americans to the increasingly desperate situation of America and our great White family of peoples.

Rockwell believed it was time for the White man to take America back from the aliens, the minorities, and the terrorists in power, under the demagoguery of cheap politicians. To accomplish this Rockwell believed he had to win not the few in the right wing, or the upper classes, but the millions and millions of our people. And to win these people he had to offer them something besides a lot of empty platitudes about freedom and the Constitution. Only National Socialism offered a positive and progressive program for all Aryan people, rather than just the middle and upper classes, and combined a concern for the purity and protection of the White race with a fighting determination to stop all further mongrelization of our people.

Within five years Rockwell had led the Nazi Party from a tiny and scorned band of roughnecks willing to take to the streets to fight treason and race-mixing, to a Party which had headquarters in Washington, Chicago, Los Angeles, and most major cities, and commanded the grudging respect of the enemy, even though there was powerful censorship of the American right to know what Rockwell was doing.

Under Commander Rockwell, the Party published the Rockwell Report, the Stormtroper, and the National Socialist World, along with bulletins for Party members only. Rockwell had plans to organize the White Guard---young, White fighting men to help protect society from the black and Red revolution which had already conquered the police departments of Los Angeles, Chicago, Cleveland and many other cities.

George Lincoln Rockwell is the father of the present-day racialist movement in the U.S. and the founder of American National Socialism. For most of his turbulent career as Commander of the A.N.P, Rockwell lived a shadowy existence on the fringes of the American political scene. He was misunderstood and rejected by the vast majority of his fellow White Americans, whom he loved dearly. He and his tiny band of "roughnecks" were alternately cursed, ridiculed and ignored by the mass media. They fought street battles without end against Communist and Jewish thugs who sought to silence them by force, and spent many a night in jail, courtesy of hostile politicians and police officers. Throughout it all, Lincoln Rockwell's warrior spirit of courage, idealism, and heroic defiance was never crushed.

His years of persistence finally paid off in 1966, when thousands of White men, women, and youth in Chicago followed his leadership in a spontaneous uprising against efforts forcibly to integrate all-White working class neighborhoods. The uprising culminated in the now-famous White People's March of September 10th, 1966, in which hundreds of Whites followed Commander Rockwell's leadership under the sign of the Swastika.

Tragically, within a year Lincoln Rockwell was dead. On August 25th, 1967 this authentic American hero was murdered in Arlington, Virginia, under circumstances which have never been satisfactorily cleared up but which point very heavily towards the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, and also to at least some involvement on the part of the man who seized control of the Nazi headquarters and "succeeded" Rockwell. The trigger man was later convicted and received a short prison term; his accomplices in the corridors of power and the traitor within the headquarters who made the phone call telling the gunman where Rockwell would be were never charged or punished.

Yet although Lincoln Rockwell died on that dark Friday in August, his heroic spirit lives on in the hearts and minds of White men and women everywhere who continue to draw inspiration from his mighty example.

Dead Whites Don't Count

by Scott McConnell

The news reached me over New Year's weekend. A horrible murder took place in Wichita, KS, 10 days before Christmas. It had received virtually no coverage beyond the local news.

The victims-three men and two women, white and in their 20s-were gathered in a home in a middle-class neighborhood. Two were teachers; two were engaged; one intended to become a priest.

At 11 in the evening, two black men, Reginald Carr, recently released from prison, and his younger brother Jonathan, allegedly forced their way into the house, abducted the five at gunpoint, drove them around in two cars, forcing them to withdraw money from ATMs. Then they took the victims to a soccer field and forced them to kneel in the snow. They undressed the women, and raped one or perhaps both of them. Then they shot all five execution-style in the head.

Four died, but one woman lived. Bleeding from her wound, she ran naked through the snow for a mile, miraculously reaching a house where she got help. The suspects were arrested the next day. Wichita is shaken and mourning. A thousand people turned out for the funeral of one victim, Jason Befort. Rev. James Dieker, celebrant at the funeral Mass, told thosegathered to look not for vengeance, but to the wisdom of Jesus on thecross: "Forgive them, Father, for they know not what to do."

Assuming that the criminal justice system will do its duty, those words may be the right ones. Yet in the current national context-with a divisive confirmation hearing looming for John Ashcroft and leading Democrats littering the airwaves with incendiary charges about the racist Republican heartland-some questions about the (non)reporting of the murder need airing as well.

If Michael McDermott's shooting of seven in their Wakefield, MA, office on the day after Christmas deserves front-page treatment, or if James Byrd being dragged to his death by three white attackers should become a symbol of national shame, why don't Americans know about Wichita?

They don't because the victims were white, the suspects black. National news editors prefer a different script. Despite the raw drama of the story-the killers might still be at large were it not for the heroic effort of a woman raped, shot and left for dead in the snow-it doesn't conform. What does fit are stories like the Byrd murder: since he was dragged to death by three white men in 1998 The New York Times alone has made references to his killing in 102 separate stories, most published before the NAACP spent millions on a national campaign to boost black voter turnout by linking George W. Bush to the crime.

Occasionally facts are invented to fit the script. Several years ago, America's evening news viewers were inundated for months with stories about an epidemic of burnings of black churches-carried out, it was charged, by racist whites. A federal investigation eventually concluded there was no racist conspiracy behind the church fires, indeed no epidemic of arson at all: just a normal rate of fires, some in white churches, some in black, some set in insurance scams, some as pranks, some because the arsonist wanted to become a hero by reporting a fire he had himself set.

But a few civil rights and anti-hate "watchdog" groups hyped stories of the black-church arson epidemic, probably for their own fundraising purposes, and the press lapped it up. If asked, many editors would claim that one sort of crime (a racially motivated killing like James Byrd's) deserves substantial coverage because it is a "hate crime," while the murder of four Wichita young people is not.

The distinction is both false and pernicious. First, though no bias crime investigation is under way in Wichita, there is no reason whatever to think that a murder involving so much gratuitous and symbolic humiliation of the victims (forcing one to watch the rape of his fiancee in his last moments) is not motivated by "hate." Indeed, what might a thorough hate crime investigation turn up? Could the suspects have been stirred to anger against whites, for instance, by Jesse Jackson's overheated charges that vicious racism was at work in the Florida election?

The hate-crime rubric itself is a blueprint for corrosive double standards. In law, it requires classifying crimes purportedly motivated by certain kinds of "bias" as more grave and deserving of serious punishment than others. The dual standard at once weakens a force that could unite Americans of all races and cultures (horror at crime) and threatens to transform the criminal justice system into an arena for exacerbating the country's fault lines of race and ethnicity.

I suspect some promoting the dual standard feel virtuous and progressive-that they are advancing the multiculturalist cause by hyping news of crime of one sort and suppressing another. Some might see whites,and particularly the sort of straight, normal heartland Middle American types, as obstacles to desired social change and not deserving of very much sympathy. Others simply adapt to prevailing newsroom expectations, internalizing the double standards. Either way it's a shameful spectacle, which does no honor to American journalism.

Friday, August 24, 2007

The Evil People Who Rule Us

You know, I get accused sometimes of being paranoid when I say that Bush and his little Jewish neo-con friends are planning on staging some kind of mega-terrorist "incident" and canceling the 2008 elections, so the neocons don't have to hand over power and Bush and Cheney and Condi and the whole neocon crew don't run the risk of ending up facing trial before a special Nuremberg-style tribunal for their crimes against humanity.

"Oh, no," the scoffers tell me, "No President, however wicked, would do such a thing!" (Cancel the elections, they mean. I think we all know in our heart of hearts Bush and Cheney and their little Jewish friends are quite capable of staging something like 9/11 once, and they're quite capable of doing it again.)

Really? Who is going to stop Bush if he does decide he doesn't feel like leaving office in 2009? Really now, who? Congress? Oh, come on now! The military? Bush has purged every officer who has questioned his increasingly deranged war strategy, and the Army is now commanded by yes-men and flunkies like this Petraeus character. (We can assume he is a yes-man and a flunky because Charles Krauthammer likes him.) The media? The media let this jackanape and his little Jewish friends lie us into one war and now they're swallowing all this horse shit about Iran being responsible for everything from sunspots to the Great Chicago Fire, swallowing it wholesale and regurgitating it on us. The "people?" They're too busy watching Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan to give a damn about anything else.

It's inevitable, you know. It may not be so with Bush, but I'll bet you dollars to donuts that if Bush decides to let Hillary take her turn, come 2016 she will damned sure find some excuse to declare herself Queen for Life. Or if not her, eventually it will happen. Some President will find that he likes that Oval Office and decide when his eight years is up that he ain't goin' nowhere. This is how republics fall and become transmogrified into military empires, a process which is taking place right before our eyes.

You know, I almost hope Bush does find some way to stay in and screw Hillary out of her turn. God, can you imagine what eight years of that Sea Hag will be like? At long last, she will have the power she has craved all her life, and by the time she marches into that Oval Office she will be insane with hatred against everyone who ever criticized her, impeded her, or crossed her in any way.

George W. Bush succeeded in something I never would have thought possible--he actually made Bill Clinton look at least tolerable as a president. Hillary Clinton might achieve something no one could think possible. She might make us look back on the years of Jug-Ears with nostalgia.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Our Gorgeous Mosaic

[I found this wandering through my inbox. Whoever forwarded it failed to include a byline. If someone knows who wrote this piece, let me know. In the meantime, listen to the words and think about whether you want to continue to live like this. - HAC]

June 24, 2007

Christopher Newsom, Jr. and Channon Gail Christian. Raped and killed. They were white.

Those who did it were black. Diversity is remarkable for its homogeneity.

From Wikipedia: "Christian's parents found her abandoned Toyota 4-Runner two blocks away from the Chipman Street house on Monday, with the help of her mobile phone provider. An envelope recovered from the vehicle yielded fingerprint evidence that led police to Lemaricus Davidson and 2316 Chipman Street. When police went to the address on Tuesday, January 9, they found the home unoccupied and Christian's body in a trash can in the kitchen. Christian was strangled to death. According to the grand jury presentment, Christian was raped vaginally, orally, and anally, and Newsom was raped anally. Vanessa Coleman told police that she witnessed Christian's mouth being cleaned with a bottle of some type of cleaner, in an attempt to remove DNA evidence. Coleman also said that she had seen clothes that were stained with blood and smelled of gas being put in the washing machine at the house. Newsom was shot three times, his body wrapped in a blanket, set afire and dumped alongside nearby railroad tracks.

The American media hold a special place in my heart for their faith in diversity. In the recent Duke case, with which I presume everyone is familiar, a lying black whore (she was lying, she was black, and she was a whore: I suppose I should identify her as Snow White's sister and a pediatric nurse) accused innocent college kids of raping her, whereupon the entire complex of media and governments piled on, ruining the boys' lives. The racial aspect got tremendous attention: white racists in the South abusing a poor black girl. This is a favorite template of the media.

Many see the hooker of Duke as just trying to get attention or money. Perhaps she was, but she was also trying to get the white kids put in the slam for many years (where, incidentally, they would almost certainly have become the sex toys of a heavily black population.) This should be a serious crime with heavy penalties. It doesn't seem to be.

But in the Tennessee case, the crime was real, and hideous. It didn't fit the template, though, so both the government and the media tried to smother the crime and to conceal the race of the criminals. This is the government to which I'm supposed to be loyal.

Note that in both cases the crimes were racial. The whore in the Duke case knew, had to know, how to work the racial angle. So did the prosecutor, who was perfectly willing to destroy the kids to advance his career, though he got disbarred for it. He ought to be jailed. With respect to the Tennessee case, note that rape is not primarily a sexual crime. Any man who wants to get laid can find a hooker for twenty bucks on a downtown street corner. It's easy. Men know that it's easy. Rape? You don't risk life in jail on a murder charge for a few minutes of lousy sex.

You do it from hatred. If you really hate whites, you make a white girl give you a blow job in front of her boyfriend. It's a kick. On your knees, bitch. Then you wash out her mouth with Drano or whatever to destroy the evidence.

Why do the government and the press consciously hide the race of criminals? Part of it is abject cowardice. Part of it is reflex, the journalistic templating that is now almost genetic. Reporters are not thoughtful. White-on-black crime is something you write about. Black-on-white isn't. Truth doesn't matter. A reporter wants to keep his job and get along in the news room. You don't make waves where you work.

The deeper reason, though, is otherwise. If the press reported the extent of black crime, hell could easily break loose. There are limits to forbearance, even federally enforced forbearance. Racial animosity is high in the United States but papered over, with mention of it verboten in the media and punished by heavy penalties, such as losing jobs.

Things are not getting better. Blacks burn a city every ten years or so. Los Angeles, Cincinnati, DC, Newark, Watts, what have you.Whites are cowed and submissive but very often quietly hostile. Any white man with a daughter will look at Christian and think, "My kid could be next."

More diversity. Search on "Wichita Horror." The usual rape, torture, mandatory blowjobs, and murder. The media also suppressed this story.

As for black crime in general, I spent over six years as a police reporter, riding at least weekly in a variety of cities, usually in black sections because that's where the crime was. There's a saying that you can bullshit the fans but you can't bullshit the players. I know what is out there. So does every cop, every prosecutor and most urban reporters, unless they cover runway fashion.

None will say it. To tell the truth is a firing offense. It's another world downtown, troops, nothing like anything most people have ever imagined.

What is out there are very high rates of black crime, much of it targeted at whites, with interracial rape being almost entirely black-on-white. The blacks of the slums hate whites. This isn't my overactive imagination. Check The Color of Crime. The figures come from the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports, and the National Crime Victimization Survey.

If you have any doubts about the attitude of the media, ask your local TV channel to hold a live debate with Jared Taylor, who compiled the figures. If the media could show his numbers to be false, they would crucify him in a heartbeat. But he's right and they know it. They are unlikely let him near a microphone.

If things were getting better, then holding the lid on, pretending and lying, might make sense: a few more years, one might say, and blacks downtown will assimilate and the whole sordid mess will evaporate.

But things are getting, if anything, worse. Few jobs exist for functionally illiterate blacks from the vast sprawling slums that whites never see. Do you know how many are functionally illiterate? When blacks and Latinos compete for jobs, the Latinos invariably win. Latinos are gaining in political power, taking over neighborhoods from black gangs. The bastardy rate among blacks hovers around seventy percent, guaranteeing social disaster. The performance of blacks in the schools is horrible and not improving. A great many whites are sick of affirmative action, sick of Jesse and Al, sick of lying news coverage, and sick of living in fear. Hispanics by the way have not a shred of guilt over the problems of blacks.

Blacks are sometimes (quietly) described as a a failed race in permanent custodial care. This may not apply to those of the middle class. It does apply to those of the slums. They are what they are going to be. Affirmaitve action has undeed produced a middle class, which may have been the best of the available choices, but the underclass is still there, waiting. There you are. I wish it weren't so, but every indication is that it is so.

For how long will silence work? The feds and the press now control the tension well. Nobody can object. We are all afraid of governmntal coercion. Consequently there exists an edgy stability. As a friend in Phnom Penh described things to me before the final siege, "The situation is hopeless but not critical."

Not yet. But the hatred that fueled the burning of the cities remains, and the imposed calm eliminates any incentive to examine a problem that isn't admitted to exist. I don't think the feds quite know how many whites are how angry. Today blacks assume that whites will always back away. The Japanese once thought the same thing.

If there is a solution, we had better find it, instead of closing our eyes and putting our fingers in our ears. One day, as the pressure on blacks from Latinos grows, if the economy begins to drop under Chinese pressure and the special privilege is no longer affordable, things may very well blow--probably between blacks and Hispanics, since they are in direct competition and often in close physical proximity. I hope I'm wrong.

Stick around.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The One Percenters

[More Classic HAC, this one from RESISTANCE #85, August 19th, 1996]

Those with a religious approach to the world's racial problem have long contended that AIDS is God's way of taking action against large numbers of sexual perverts and non-Whites whose continued existence is incompatible with any kind of stable or livable society. Non-religious racial nationalists can plausibly make the same claim, except they substitute the word "Nature" for God. Whatever you want to call the Force, there have always been certain indications that AIDS is a highly selective disease. Let's be quite frank: with a statistically insignificant number of truly tragic, innocent exceptions like Ryan White and Kimberly Bergalis, AIDS doesn't kill off anybody we can't do without.

Now science has made a discovery which offers further food for thought. The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York, ironically a Jewish-run institute, has discovered a new human gene they call CCR5. Although little understood as yet, CCR5 apparently has two interesting characteristics. It renders the fortunate possessor naturally immune to the HIV virus, and it is found only in people of Aryan racial descent. Not blacks. Not Asians. Apparently not even Jews, given coded references in the study to "persons of northern European heritage."

CCR5 is a key gene in the construction of the human immune system, and it is actually a mutated gene which does not produce a series of proteins which is the main "docking point" for the AIDS virus. The scientists estimate that about one in a hundred, or one percent of White people have two copies of this special gene in heir makeup, one each from their mother and father. An additional twenty percent have one copy, making it possible for them to pass the immunity on to their children, presuming of course they marry other White people.

As most of you know, I generally turn flips to avoid discussing anything resembling theology, but this is simply too fascinating a development not to speculate on. A special mutated gene which will allow one percent of all Aryans to survive this growing plague which is felling our racial enemies the world over by the millions? The medical establishment is trying to cook the statistics, but it is now obvious that Africa, the Caribbean basin and the black population in this country are headed for an AIDS death rate in the 21st century so massive that it may check or even reverse their present explosive, exponential birth rate. In fact, unless they change their behavior (fat chance!) it could wipe them out altogether.

Where did this special gene come from? Why did it decide to mutate just now? Could it be that Someone Up There wants to make sure that at least a few Aryans survive the (small "h") holocaust to repopulate the earth as it should be populated?

I can live with that.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Houston Stash House Raid Nets 67 Wetbacks

Just to put a little perspective on how huge the immigration problem is in this country: the Houston Chronicle reports that Federal agents found 67 people at stash house for wetbacks. "Federal officials have charged six men with harboring scores of illegal immigrants who were found packed into a house in a quiet southeast Houston neighborhood. The one-story residence was one of many stash houses that smugglers use in Houston for holding illegal immigrants until they can be moved elsewhere or released after relatives pay a fee, investigators said." The Feds charged six Mexicans who were running the stash house with immigration offenses and false imprisonment.

The Chronicle goes on: "Federal officials said 67 people were found in a one-story house in the 7000 block of Schley about 12:30 p.m. Thursday after a man flagged down a Houston police officer and pleaded for help. The man said his relative and other people were being held in the home and that those holding them were demanding thousands of dollars for the person's release. The officer alerted U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE agents took the occupants into custody, including a 9-year-old and 13 other juveniles, and will begin deportation procedures."

Would anyone care to hazard a guess on how many of those illegals will, in fact, be deported and how many will end up getting visas or simply being released?

One interesting aspect of things also appears in the article. "The immigrants include 26 from Honduras, 24 from El Salvador, 13 from Mexico and two each from Brazil and Guatemala." We tend to lump all Hispanic immigrants together as "Mexicans," but we need to remember that over 134 nationalities have been intercepted by the Border Patrol coming across our porous southern border, everything from Mexicans to Iranians to Nigerians. All of the Third World is using America as a dumping ground, and they're all coming across the Mexican border. There is some illegal immigration from the north, from Canada, but the vast bulk of the illegals enter from Mexico.

Now, multiply this one stash house with 67 beaners crammed into it by how many thousand similar such facilities all across the southern United States? Illegal immigrant smuggling is a large a lucrative business, which is why the present government we have now will never do anything about it--it has high profit margins for everyone down the line, except of course for the American worker who gets screwed.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Great Northwest Independence Videos

Joe Bob says check it out:

Saturday, August 18, 2007

It's Official: "Holocaust" Denial To Become A Crime

Europe has taken another step down the road to total slavery and subservience to the Jews. According to the prestigious Financial Times of London, "Laws that make denying or trivialising the Holocaust a criminal offence punishable by jail sentences will be introduced across the European Union, according to a proposal expected to win backing from ministers Thursday. Offenders will face up to three years in jail under the proposed legislation, which will also apply to inciting violence against ethnic, religious or national groups."

"Trivialising" the so-called Holocaust, or should I say "trivializing" to give the word its American spelling? That's now a criminal offense? What the devil does that mean? Who defines what constitutes "trivializing" the Holocaust? (Don't bother to answer that. I guess we know who defines it.)

The Financial Times goes on: "Diplomats in Brussels voiced confidence on Tuesday that the controversial plan, which has been the subject of heated debate for six years, will be endorsed by member states. However, the Baltic countries and Poland are still holding out for an inclusion of Stalinist crimes alongside the Holocaust in the text – a move that is being resisted by the majority of other EU countries."

So, in other words, you could be arrested for denying so-called atrocities that never occurred, but not for denying real historical atrocities that actually did occur?

The Financial Times continues: "The latest draft, seen by the Financial Times, will make it mandatory for all Union member states to punish public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin." (Define "incitement to hatred," please.) They will also have to criminalise publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes when such statements incite hatred or violence against minorities...Diplomats stressed the provision had been carefully worded to include only denial of the Holocaust - the Nazi mass murder of Jews during the second world war - and the genocide in Rwanda in 1994."

Oh, okay, so now blacks have equal Victim Status alongside Jews? Wonder how the Jews feel about that? Some aren't so lucky, though, like the poor Armenians. According to the Financial Times, "In an attempt to assuage Turkish fears, several EU diplomats said the provisions would not penalise the denial of mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman troops in the aftermath of the 1915 collapse of the Ottoman empire. Turkey strongly rejects claims that this episode amounted to genocide."

Okay, so let me get this straight: if you deny the so-called Jewish Holocaust of World War Two, which did not occur, you go to prison. If you deny the fact that a lot of African monkoids chopped each other up with machetes in 1994, you to prison. (Why would anyone want to deny it? Who cares?)

But if you deny that Joseph Stalin murdered forty million human beings, you get a pass. (Much to the relief of left-wing academics in Europe and America, no doubt.) And if you deny that a lot of people were killed on both sides during the Turkish-Armenian war of 1915, you get a pass, at least if you're a Turk.

But what if a European chooses to deny the Armenian "Holocaust?" Does he get the same pass as a Turk? What is some historian denies the atrocities committed by Napoleon during the early 19th Century or the mass murder of White farmers in Rhodesia? What if a European writes an article claiming that Genghis Khan wasn't such a bad guy after all, or trying to prove that no British civilians were massacred during the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny in India? This law seems to leave so much untouched...

Here it is, simply put: the Jews are godlike, immune from any criticism of any kind, and so are blacks. Everybody else is still fair game until they find some way to use democracy to further restrict what their fellow citizens can say and think and believe.

That about cover it?

Friday, August 17, 2007

Are You Washed In The Blood, My Brother?

"When you baptize a Jew, hold him under water for five minutes."

-Bulgarian proverb

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Method In Jug-Ears' Madness?

Okay, I think I have finally figured out what Jug-Ears is doing vis-a-vis Iran and the projected "mega-terror attack."

Jug knows there is a kind of minimum time frame for impeachment, either against himself or against the flabby-faced monster Cheney. Say, what? Three months? He's got even more time, of course, if Congress suddenly find their balls and try to take out Cheney first. But if they try to take both madmen down at once, there's still a lag of about three months.

Let's assume the planned "mega terror attack" that will allow Bush and Cheney to cancel the 2008 elections and rule by decree is scheduled for, say, September of 2008. That sounds about right, eh? And there's a three-month time lag on impeachment. The House has to draw up the charges, send them to the Senate, etc. It took about three months with Billyboy, if memory serves.

Okay, that means that in my view, the attack on Iran will in fact be held off until, say, May or June of 2008, so basically even if Congress hasn't been whipped down into a pile of wet and wobbly dog poop by then, they won't have time to impeach the two assholes, since in theory they'll be leaving office soon. Of course, then the "mega-attack" will come and Bush will just be forced--very much against his will and with a heavy heart, of course--to cancel those pesky elections.

Well, looking on the bright side, that's probably the only way to save this country from Hillary. Other than the way we can't talk about, of course.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Idaho's Top Anti-Racist Busted As Child Molestor

[More Classic HAC, from RESISTANCE #86, August 26th, 1997]

There's an old Latin proverb, "Qui custode ipsos custodes?" Who guards the guardians?

So who's monitoring the monitors? You know,all those arrogant neo-Marxist trash who claim to be so morally superior to ordinary mortals that they have the right to engage in illegal and unconstitutional surveillance, spying, harassment and slander against any White American who dares to disagree with their agenda? People like Morris Dees, Lenny Zeskind, Bill Wassmuth, and all the lesser lights in what has become a lucrative industry and a valuable unofficial auxiliary service to the Federal government?

One of ex-Father Bill Wassmuth's cronies, a man named Bob Melon Brown, is head of the Kootenai County, Idaho Human Rights task force, the people who harass the Aryan Nations on a regular basis and issue regular press statements denouncing "racial hatred" which the media lap up. Brown is also chairman of the Kootenai County Democratic Club and a close personal friend of Kootenai County Prosecutor Bill Douglas.

Finally, Mr. Brown is a bugger boy who likes them young. He has been arrested and charged with raping a thirteen year-old boy in Hayden. His buddy D.A. Douglas is most embarrassed. He had to excuse himself from the case and a special prosecutor from out of town had to be appointed by the Idaho Attorney General because of Brown's close links with the Democratic machine. The power Brown wields was demonstrated when he admitted the crime in his preliminary hearing in May and was promptly released by the judge on his own recognizance. The case has since dropped out of sight; not a peep in the local media.

Brown took over the lefty scene in Coeur d'Alene when Bill Wassmuth, a Catholic priest who was defrocked for sexual indiscretions of his own, left the area some years ago in search of greener pastures and corporate donations to his now Seattle-based Northwest Coalition Against Malicious Harassment, the "monitoring group" with the biggest franchise in the Northwest.

As we have pointed out in past issues of Resistance, Wassmuth's published list of donors includes such multinationals as Weyerhauser, Boise Cascade, U.S. Bank and the USWest communications giant, none of them noted as especially environmentally friendly. Presumably some of their CEOs have figured out that if all the unwashed lefty scum and Sixties retreads in the Northwest are standing on some dirt road waving signs and shrieking at the Aryan Nations and Skinheads, they have a lot less time to scream and yell and interfere with logging and manufacturing and toxic waste disposal.

Next time you see or hear one of these "monitoring groups" badmouthing Whites in the media, ask yourself who's child they're molesting.

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

The Importance of Race

" . . . The racialist worldview finds the importance of mankind in its basic racial elements. On principle it views the state as but a means to an end, and conceives that end to be the racial existence of man. Thus, by no means does it believe in equality of the races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher and lesser value and feels itself obligated, through this knowledge, to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and to demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal Will which dominates this universe.

"Thus, on principle, it embraces the basic aristocratic idea of Nature and believes in the validity of this law down to the last individual . . . It believes in the necessity of an idealization of mankind, in which in turn it sees the sole premise for the existence of mankind.

"But it cannot grant the right to existence even to an ethical idea, if this idea represents a danger for the racial life of the bearers of a higher ethic; for in a bastardized and negrified world all concepts of the humanly beautiful and sublime, as well as all ideas of an idealized future for mankind, would be lost forever."

-Mein Kampf
Book II, Chapter 1

Monday, August 13, 2007

The Nature of Revolution

"War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself." - Unknown

Sunday, August 12, 2007

A Grip and a Click

[For those of you unfamiliar with the corpus of his work, and I use that term advisedly, Vince 23 is kind of the Beat Poet of the Hate Generation. Imagine him reciting to the SS guards in a coffee house in Auschwitz and you get the idea.]

It's heavy living one moment to the next.
A grip, a click, a hex.
It's the way.
A pocket full of .38 & .45.
Ye feel the heat of the day. ...

There's no other way around,
No other way, you will see.
I will bring your doom, a nuke, a mushroom.
No other is such a curse,
A scourge, a disease,
The jew will be on its knees.

You will stand at your funeral,
An execution, an annihilation.
This I will see.
Your blood on my hands is a decree of my love for you.
Time is short for you jew,
You will fry in the boiling vats.

You grab at the last straws of the world,
you need these to build bricks
For your kingdom of damnation.
You proudly confess ye are the jew,
I say ye are the blood thirsty few.
The scourge of the Earth.

The first in line for doom.
A grip & a click is all I see,
The union of a hand and a gun
This will put you at ease.. ...
The world is at ease with you as the deceased.
The world is pleased with you on your knees.

We proclaim you as Satan,
Ye sons as the arms of damnation.
Ye daughters as whores of Israel.
I will see the day of your demise.
Here in America, you will be vaporized,
impaled in public and shot in the face.

-Vince 23

Saturday, August 11, 2007

The End of History, My Ass!

[Some more Classic HAC]

December 28th, 2003

Dear Racial Comrades:

A reference I made a couple of C-Grams ago to Francis Fukuyama and The End of History piqued a couple of you and I was asked about it. Francis Fukuyama is a Japanese college professor and pseudo-intellectual type who in 1989 published a lengthy article in one of these turgid left-liberal think tank journals that no one has ever heard of called The National Interest. According to Google, anyway. I had to look this up.

The essence of what Fukuyama says in that monograph is that "liberal democracy" (i.e. Jewish controlled plutocracy) is "the final phase of man's ideological evolution", and has proven itself superior to such alternate systems as monarchy, theocracy, communism, military dictatorship, constitutional republicanism, etc. so as to become "the final form of human government."

Thus, according to Fuku-san, the history of the world from this point on will be nothing but a glittering blur, one endless vista of Dilberts in cubicles, Sunday morning talking heads on cable TV, and Wal-Marts, each with its own McDonald's attached of course. (I've always found it fascinating that the first thing the American invaders did after capturing Baghdad was to bring in and stock a Burger King at the airport.)

Or, as we in our silly little "Movement" put it, ZOG is forever, unbeatable and invincible and all-powerful, and any resistance is futile so please stop pestering us with this Northwest thing, Harold.

This is one of those topics where I am somewhat at a loss for words. What the hell am I supposed to say to such a pernicious idea other than it's just plain wrong?

And is there any point in my attempting to refute it? We'll just find some other excuse to do nothing. This is "the Movement", where we never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

The first thing that strikes me just from glancing over the Google articles that came up in my search is that apparently Fukuyama himself is now backtracking on this stupid idea that that future of the world is nothing more than eternal CNN and Ronald McDonald. He seems to have noticed the fact that ZOG is collapsing, and when a huge empire like this finally falls all kinds of possibilities exist for peoples to seize back their destinies. I always said the Japs were the smartest of all non-Whites.

I might add that the essential nature of liberal democracy [Jewish-supremacist plutocracy] is already mutating. The kikes and the Anglo-Zionist ruling elite--the soulless white men in business suits who are a worse enemy to our race than any rabbi---have learned that we have now been sufficiently dumbed down and apathetized to the point where it is no longer necessary to maintain the level of appearances that used to be necessary.

The showpiece of liberal democracy has always been the election of representatives, but the legislative branch of government is now for all practical purposes defunct. Actual power no longer resides in the elected representatives of any parliamentary body anywhere in the world, much less in the United States Congress. Our present President was appointed by the Supreme Court, as opposed to the usual sham electoral process. Congress has repeatedly abdicated its Constitutional authority to declare war, so that the American President is now more or less a Caesar who invades and conquers foreign countries at will.

The judicial branch of government is in the process of being subsumed by the electronic communications media. Court TV is being slowly transmuted into a court. So far this is only occurring in a few selected celebrity cases such as O. J., Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, etc. but I have seen serious proposals that criminal prosecutions be turned into cable TV or internet shows wherein guilt or innocence is decided by mass "voting" or polling of the viewers. The destruction of human life as a form of entertainment; bread and circuses as they used to say in ancient Rome. (Yes, there are those who claim quite seriously that this would be a true "jury of one's peers".) The beginning of this trend is distinctly visible; some attorneys now retain media consultants on their staff as a matter of course and spend more time on the talk shows than in the courtroom.

In short, liberal democracy, far from being the end of history, is only the beginning of something else. Something which may admittedly turn out to be far worse, but still, by no means "the final phase of man's ideological evolution."

Finally, we are Aryans. We are better than everyone else, we've just forgotten that fact and we're bone idle with it. If we ever decide to exert the effort, we can wrench Fukuyama's "history" off its Zoggish track and back onto the course of Western man and civilization even at the eleventh hour and the fifty-ninth minute. Nothing is inevitable, and nothing lasts forever. Including ZOG. Period, end of story. That's just the way human nature is.

Right now the Northwest Migration movement offers human history a way out of the morass of collapsing liberal democracy. We can all come here and make our own country. It is simply a matter of our choosing to do so.

And we'd damned well better make that choice soon. Because if we don't, we may all live to see the end of our history as a race and a civilization.