Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Political Spin

[This is one of those things that wandered in off the internet, and either the attribution wasn't attached or else I just plain lost it. - HAC]

This is what political spin looks like:

Judy, a professional genealogical researcher, discovered that Hillary Clinton's great-great uncle, Remus Rodham, a fellow lacking in character, was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889. The only known photograph of Remus shows him standing on the gallows. On the back of the picture is this inscription: "Remus Rodham, a horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison 1885, escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times. Caught by Pinkerton detectives, convicted and hanged in 1889."

Judy e-mailed for comments. Hillary's staff of professional image adjusters cropped Remus' picture, scanned it, enlarged the image, and edited it with image processing software, so that all that's seen is a head shot. The accompanying biographical sketch read as follows:

"Remus Rodham was a famous cowboy in the Montana Territory. His business empire grew to include acquisition of valuable equestrian assets and intimate dealings with the Montana railroad. Beginning in 1883, he devoted several years of his life to service at a government facility, finally taking leave to resume his dealings with the railroad. In 1887, he was a key player in a vital investigation run by the renowned Pinkerton Detective Agency. In 1889, Remus passed away during an important civic function heldin his honor when the platform upon which he was standing collapsed."

And that's how it's done.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Indians Carry Out Ethnic Cleansing

In an interesting demonstration of red-on-black racism, Yahoo News reports that "Cherokee Nation members voted Saturday to revoke the tribal citizenship of an estimated 2,800 descendants of the people the Cherokee once owned as slaves. With all 32 precincts reporting, 76.6 percent had voted in favor of an amendment to the tribal constitution that would limit citizenship to descendants of 'by blood' tribe members as listed on the federal Dawes Commission's rolls from more than 100 years ago."

Wait a minute. Indians can do things on the basis of 'by blood' but white people can't? ("A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."--Ralph Waldo Emerson.)

Yahoo reports that back in the day, "The commission, set up by a Congress bent on breaking up Indians' collective lands and parceling them out to tribal citizens, drew up two rolls, one listing Cherokees by blood and the other listing freedmen, a roll of blacks regardless of whether they had Indian blood. Some opponents of the ballot question argued that attempts to remove freedmen from the tribe were motivated by racism." (Gasp! Shock! Horror! No, no, not racism! Anything but that! You mean there's yet another group of people who don't like de po' cullud folk?)

"The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote," tribal Principal Chief Chad Smith said. "Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No one else has the right to make that determination." So, chief, I gather that what you are saying is that a nation consists of, among other things, people who are of the same race? Ahhh. Comes the dawn. I think we all know what would happen to any white man who said any such thing.

Yahoo goes on: "The petition drive for the ballot measure followed a March 2006 ruling by the Cherokee Nation Supreme Court that said an 1866 treaty assured freedmen descendants of tribal citizenship. Since then, more than 2,000 freedmen descendants have enrolled as citizens of the tribe. Court challenges by freedmen descendants seeking to stop the election were denied, but a federal judge left open the possibility that the case could be refiled if Cherokees voted to lift their membership rights." Basically, the blacks and their smart Jewish lawyers are going to go running to the courts to get something they can't get in an election. As usual.

Now...this whole issue wouldn't have anything to do with gambling profits and thousands of blacks getting a free check in the mail every month as their cut from casinos, on the basis of their allegedly being Indians, now, would it? I mean, surely no self-respecting black person would want to just get a check in the mail for nothing, would they? Surely not! What a racist thought! Wash your brain out with soap, boy!

Saturday, July 28, 2007

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Honky

[Some Classic HAC for you from 2004]

...Basically, the "Movement" as most call it, or the Racially Conscious Community as I call it, operates under certain guidelines governing the behavior and interrelationships between Fearless Leader and supporter, and Fearless Leader and external forces, i. e. the government. (I prefer the term Racially Conscious Community because "Movement" implies concerted motion in a specific direction, which does not exist anywhere in our subculture with the exception of Northwest Migration.)

We do not like acknowledging these rules. We try to pretend that they don't exist, and one of the reasons Harold Covington catches so much flak is that he discusses them in public. (If Tom Metzger and Bob Dole can refer to themselves in the third person, then so can Harold Covington.)

These Protocols pretty much apply to all racial nationalist endeavors--Klan, militia, intellectual racist, Christian Identity, Hollywood Nazi, closet Nazi, what have you. The one exception to the Protocols is Skinhead, which has wandered away from its origins and mutated into an urban gang culture, and now operates under those anthropological canons.

The following is how the White "Movement" works in actual practice.


Section One: The Problem

PROTOCOL I. -The spiritual cause of the crisis of civilization which threatens the existence of the white race is not the Jews, blacks, mestizos, the Federal Reserve, the Bilderbergers, or whatever. These people are a problem only because the White male allows them to be. The true crisis of world civilization is the spiritual degeneration and degradation of the White male character.

PROTOCOL II. - The Racially Conscious Community will go to any lengths necessary to avoid confronting the character issue and dealing with its implications, because to do so would mean changing our behavior, and this we absolutely refuse to do.

PROTOCOL III. - The proximate, immediate physical threat to the continued existence of the white race and Western civilization is the Federal government of the United States.

PROTOCOL IV. - The present order is completely irredeemable and cannot be changed from within or by any legal, peaceful means. The only way in which the threat posed by the Federal government of the United States to the continued existence of the White race and Western civilization may be removed, is through the destruction of that government through force of arms and the punishment of its active participants for their crimes against humanity.

PROTOCOL V. - Every member of the Racially Conscious Community, without exception, understands this and is aware of the truth of Protocol IV. With only one exception, myself, no one at all is willing to say so in public.

I acknowledge that there is some danger in doing so; it is even possible that I may be arrested myself for daring to write the previous paragraphs. I am simply stating an easily observable historic and political fact of life, but since 9/11 government paranoia has been running very high and who knows nowadays? I may hear the knock on my door tomorrow. Bill White may be able to get away with posting a direct threat to the life of President Bush on his web site, but I'm not Bill White.

If there is to be any hope at all, we must make a complete, fearless, and brutally honest moral inventory of ourselves. The situation is simply too vitally urgent now for us to continue to evade unpalatable truths out of fear or moral laziness.

PROTOCOL VI. - No one in the Racially Conscious Community is willing even to consider taking any direct physical action against the government. This will not change in any foreseeable future. Life is simply too sweet for the White male of today. As bad as things are, there is simply too much pleasure yet to be had. There is simply too much variety and tasty junk food and alcohol and consumer toys still out there, to be wallowed in and enjoyed. Not one single man among us feels sufficiently strongly about what he professes to believe to place himself at risk, or to give up his personal pleasures for the common good.

PROTOCOL VII. - The world at large, including the government, is aware of the truth of Protocol VI and accordingly holds us in great contempt. We deserve this contempt.

Section Two: The Fearless Leader As Shaman

PROTOCOL VIII. - The role of the Fearless Leader within the RCC is to provide a spiritual service, by publicly articulating and speaking aloud what the overwhelming majority of White people in this country actually feel about racial minorities, homosexuals, and the government, but which they are afraid to say themselves.

Fearless Leadership is a form of priestcraft or shamanism. The Fearless Leader is a kind of "sin-eater" who purges the White male member of the RCC of his deserved feelings of self-loathing and contempt. Racially conscious White people are what the Irish call whiskey priests. We know what is right, we just don't do it. The Fearless Leader gives us a kind of absolution by allowing the White male to salve his conscience through small inconsequential acts like posting an e-mail to a bulletin board, or littering lawns with leaflets at night, and of course through small donations of cash which do not seriously incommode the White male or interfere with his pleasures or his play.

This is an extension of the Christian idea that racial salvation, like personal salvation, can be had through good works and charity alone, and that the hard and painful self-evaluation and spiritual transformation of the White male, which alone will actually save us, is therefore not really necessary. This idea is completely false, and if not corrected will lead to the destruction of the White race and all we have created on earth.

In point of fact, only the voluntary renunciation of material things, consumerism, and the pleasures of private life will save us. White revolution and White survival can never be accomplished within the parameters of the American middle-class consumer society. We can never defeat the Jews while they hold us hostage through our love of possessions. The RCC has fought tooth and nail against this truth for three generations and continues to do so. Someone like Harold Covington who speaks of spiritual transformation and the renunciation of the material world of the Jew is damn near lynched.

The Fearless Leader makes the racially conscious White male feel good about himself, without actually doing anything to harm the enemy or help the White race and thus incurring risk or inconvenience. So long as the Feelgood Factor is there, who can really tell the difference where it comes from, and who cares anyway? Feelgood is feelgood, and American spiritual palates can't tell the difference between the Fearless Leader's Thunderbird and the fine aged cognac of true participation in revolutionary change.

But you will notice here one of the Fearless Leader's trademarks. At no point in his activities is the Jewish establishment or the Federal government's hold on power actually threatened, and at no point are any individuals within the power structure even mildly annoyed. The entire Fearless Leader-White male dynamic takes place within a sanitized bubble. Any attempt to break out of the bubble and cause annoyance to the actual enemy is met with swift and ferocious punishment from ZOG.

With the brief exception of The Order, at no point at all in the past fifty years, until the appearance of Northwest Migration on the political landscape, has there ever been any serious attempt on our part to bring about actual political, social, or racial change.

PROTOCOL IX. - The Fearless Leader proffers us a false coin: the idea of risk-free revolution.

A Fearless Leader (a good one, anyway) earns his living by convincing White people of the Racially Conscious Community that they can play without paying; that somehow it is possible to save the White race without any painful self-evaluation, without any spiritual transformation, without dealing with any uncomfortable character issues or facing up to any unpalatable truths, and above all without any renunciation of air conditioning, color TV and consumer toys.

It is impossible to overstate how lethally dangerous this idea is to the continued existence of the White race. The Fearless Leader convinces White people that they can in fact enjoy the thrills, chills, and spills of the game without putting anything on the table. His message is that there can be gain without pain. This is the very quintessence of the Middle American way: the perpetual search for the quick fix, the quest to get something for nothing, the demand for immediate gratification of all desires without effort. The Fearless Leader is accordingly loved and admired for it.

Harold Covington, on the other hand, shouts at people and makes them feel bad about themselves by demanding that they actually do things that are terribly inconvenient. He provides no spiritual healing, no Feelgood Factor. HAC speaks of spiritual transformation and has weird, archaic ideas, like this silly notion that gambling away donation money is wrong, and other such anachronisms. He is accordingly stoned on sight.

PROTOCOL X. - No one really believes that it is possible to bring about genuine change and to save the White race from extinction, since we all know what would be required--a successful armed overthrow of the United States government--and none of us has the character or courage to do this.

Ergo, the "Movement" is actually just a form of protest, a kind of hobby one dabbles in to while away the long, sad years while waiting for death. The "Movement" is more or less a kind of entertainment, and Fearless Leaders are in the entertainment industry.

PROTOCOL XI. - Protocol X creates a vicious cycle of self-fulfilling prophecy. Because no one really believes victory is possible, almost no one supports RCC activities at the kind of 110% levels necessary to win.

We are a "Movement" of half-steppers. Financial donations are almost always of a token, hobbyist kind, and in fact a good many racially conscious White males spend far more on actual hobbies than they do on racial politics. The phenomenon of the guy who sends a $10 check to a racial grouplet while he's got $10,000 worth of Civil War re-enactment equipment and costumes in his closet and a $30,000 SUV in his driveway is entirely too common. [There are a tiny number of exceptions, and they are duly noted and gratefully acknowledged. - HAC]

Personal participation in the Racially Conscious Community generally stops at the point where it becomes necessary to step out from behind the computer, or in some other way become identified as someone who thinks politically incorrect thoughts. At a recent pull-out-all-the-stops, everybody-get-your-pale-butt-there "Aryan Fest" organized months in advance by Billy Roper on a nationwide basis, all of 350 people showed up, of whom we can assume at least 50 were government agents, spies for Morris Dees, or undercover reporters. Almost all the rest were Skinheads and their hangers-on in search of free beer and a free concert. The average wedding reception draws more people than the biggest White racial events.

Racial idealism ends where personal inconvenience begins...because after all, it's just a hobby, and what kind of fool gets himself jammed up over a mere hobby, right? I mean, it's not as if anything is ever going to come of all this, right?

This attitude is arguably the greatest single reason why we lose, and will continue to lose, until such time as there is a complete spiritual transformation of the White male.

Section Three - Northwest Migration

PROTOCOL XII. - There is now no way, none at all, that we or anyone else will ever recover the entire United States of America and restore it to any semblance of what it was a hundred years ago.

Every single person reading these lines knows perfectly well that this is true, whether they admit it or not. The racial contamination and collapse have simply gone too far, and there are simply too many mud people now resident on the North American continent. Even if we were somehow to acquire some kind of paramilitary deterrent and the ability to use it, it would be physically impossible to kill them all or remove them by force. Everyone reading these lines knows perfectly well that this is true.

There is no alternative plan to Northwest Migration, none at all, and it is now clear that there will be none forthcoming.

PROTOCOL XIII. - The Northwest Migration is completely unique within the so-called "Movement".

For the first time since the days of Commander Rockwell's ANP, there is a true movement that involves both political and physical forward motion towards a specific, defined and quantifiable goal. For the first time since Rockwell's days, there is a movement within the Racially Conscious Community that is centered around a legal, defining act as opposed to the generation of nothing but words.

The Northwest Migration is deed-based as opposed to word-based. It is predicated around something that racially aware white people do, rather than something they say. This is true of no other tendency or faction in the RCC.

PROTOCOL XIV. - Northwest Migration is doable.

Northwest Migration seeks to bring about actual, physical, demographic change for the betterment of White people in a designated area of the North American continent which has been reduced to manageable proportions.

Northwest Migration is legal.

Northwest Migration is easily within the financial capacity of virtually every self-proclaimed racialist in America, given a couple of years or less of serious and methodical preparation.

Northwest Migration is in the personal best interest of White people because once the basic hurdles of finding a home and a job are overcome, the Homeland is one of the best remaining places in the world for White people to live, and will probably be the last part of the continent which in any way resembles what normal people think of as America. In view of the aging White population, it is one of the few places where there is at least some chance that our old age will not be unmitigated hell.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Ed and Elaine Brown On Video




Thursday, July 26, 2007

Do We Dare Talk About Global Warming?

Over the past few years, something potentially unhealthy has made its appearance in White Nationalist discussion, such as there is any. We seem to have latched on to the idea that just because left-wing hippy-dippy tree-huggers come up with an idea, it just HAS to be wrong and bad for the white man. Well, yeah, in most cases, the mess these weirdos come up with is pretty far out. But I am going to go way out on a limb here. Sorry, guys, but I think there really is something to global warming.

I think so for two reasons. The first is that you can jolly well feel the warming in North Carolina, over a period of forty years. I go by Halloween. When I was a child, I remember I always had to wear a jacket and a woolly hat on Halloween day. Nowadays, I have to run the air conditioning on October 31st.

You used to be able to grow water-intensive fruit like watermelons and canteloups and peaches in the Rio Grande Valley. Now all of the southern half of Texas is virtually unlivable for five months out of the year; it's turning into a baking, oven-like desert so hot it's even driving the Mexicans north.

Secondly--I'm sorry, guys, but the scientific evidence for global warming is just piling up a bit too high now. No, it's not just some brief climactic fluctuation. No, it's not some mysterious process that we don't understand and we "need more data to draw any conclusions"; ask the people who sweltered through this murderous summer in New York and Texas whether we need any more damned data. Even the tame science wonks hired by the oil companies to throw smoke in the public's eyes for the past twenty years are starting to throw in the towel and fall silent now.

Let's face it, guys, those damned oil companies run by the soulless businessmen in silk suits have screwed us yet again. Not only do they put drunken morons in the White House, along with neocons who start pointless wars, but they keep trying to get us to buy huge gas-guzzling SUV tanks that we don't need, and they refuse to expend even a fraction of their obscene profits on developing any alternative sources of fuel at all.

Never mind such dodgey propositions as wind and solar power--methane and alcohol would do the trick nicely, and they can be manufactured right here in the good old U. S. of A., without our having to invade and conquer anybody to steal their defecating pigs, which is the best source of methane.

The racial effects of global warming are already starting to show, as more and more muds are being driven out of the baking southern areas of the continent seeking the cooler northern areas, i.e. the areas of North America which are still predominantly white. And don't even get me started on what's going to happen when Peak Oil hits and people can no longer run their air conditioners or heaters. Guys, we'd really, really better get our act together and do something about this, because right now, the rest of this century is a future no one in his right mind wants to contemplate.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Is There No Longer Such A Thing As An Impeachable Offense?

I am going to assume my readers have at least a basic interest in news and current affairs, and that everyone reading this will at least be familiar with the rudiments of the U. S. Attorney-Gate scandal now enveloping beaner Attorney General Alberto Gonzales ("Habeas corpus? We don't need no stinkin' habeas corpus!") and the Bush White House, specifically Karl Rove. It is also beginning to appear that President George W. Bush is in it right up to his jug ears. They're now talking about a Special Prosecutor, who with any luck might end up filing a big Ken Starr-Style report two or three years after Jug leaves office. (If he leaves office, but that's a topic for another time.)

Basically, the White House, i.e. Karl Rove and maybe Bush himself if he was sober that day, acting through through Bush groupie Harriet Miers, told Gonzales to put pressure on the 93 United States Attorneys' offices around the country to A) Investigate and indict corrupt and immoral Democratic politicians, a B) Ignore and cover up for corrupt and immoral Republican politicians. Eight Federal prosecutors who refused to play ball and persisted in investigating and indicting GOP crooks as opposed to Democratic crooks were dismissed from office.

Is this a corrupt practice? Of course it is. The United States government and all their agencies in their entirety are corrupt. What part about this can we possibly not fail to understand after growing up in this society since the Roosevelt dictatorship which began in 1933?

There is also a lot of media hullabaloo over the alleged White House plan to fire all 93 U. S. Attorneys and replace them with Republican political hacks. The fact that Bill Clinton, acting through his bull dyke Attorney General Janet Reno, actually did that very thing in 1993, seems to have been flushed down the memory hole.

According to anAssociated Press article, Gonzales told reporters, "I acknowledge that mistakes were made here. I accept that responsibility." But having "accepted his responsibility," he generously lets himself off the hook with a slap on the wrist. (Maybe even a Presidential pardon if it comes to that.)

Of course he's not going to resign. Jeez, Rummy managed to hold on for six years before Bush was finally forced to get rid of him for criminal incompetence and negligence. You can't get anybody out of the Bush administration short of blasting them out with dynamite. (Note to the paranoid sociopaths at the FBI Secret Service: figure of speech, guys, figure of speech.)

Etc. etc. etc. Basically, Bush and his little Jewish neocon friends used the machinery of justice and the Federal government as a weapon with which to persecute their political opponents and anyone who dissents from their deranged policies. SER-PRISE, SER-PRISE, Sergeant Carter!

Is this a "high crime and misdemeanor?" Probably. Will anyone, Alberto Gonzales or Karl Rove or even Jug-Ears himself, be impeached or indicted or tried for any of this? Of course not. Don't be silly. Congress doesn't have the balls to impeach a wino, never mind a neocon, and everyone knows it. That drunken midget in the White House is hurtling us like an epileptic comet towards a civilization-ending war with Iran, and we are all sitting here staring at him like a deer in the headlights, paralyzed, like a rabbit with a snake. In another few weeks the Iran war will begin, and all of this Federal prosecutor nonsense will be forgotten as we're all queueing up at the pumps for $7.00 a gallon gas, if we can get any.

We deserve what we get.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

How Do The Jews Do It? They Don't.

The Jews claim to be morally superior to everyone else, with a mandate from God to tell everyone else how to run their lives. They claim that Israel is the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy and a "Light Unto The Nations."

Okay, fine. How does the "Light Unto The Nations" handle illegal immigration? Very simple. They don't allow any. Period, end of story.

According to an article in the newspaper Haaretz, which is the Israeli equivalent of the New York Times, "The Knesset (Israeli parliament) on Wednesday voted to extend and widen the controversial Citizenship Law, which denies family unification to Israelis and Palestinians. The law, which was to have expired next month, will be extended to July 2008 and apply to citizens of the four enemy states - Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Iran - as well as to those of the Palestinian Authority."

So much for immigration marriages of convenience and sneaking into Israel to have an anchor baby, one of the two favorite tricks of Third Worlders to sneak into America.

In addition to expelling, murdering, and torturing the Arabs who are already under their control, the Jews follow a rudimentary common sense precaution which no one in the United States seems to be able to grasp, and they don't let any more in. Kind of makes sense. As reluctant as I am to concede anything to Jews, the fact is that they understand the insanity of throwing open their borders and allowing any Tom, Dick and Achmed to just stroll on in. They're even building a huge fortified wall with massive concrete berms and razor wire across the whole country from north to south in order to keep the Arabs out. So why do we let any Tom, Ricardo, and Jose just walk on into our country at will?

Let me get this straight: the Jews get to have their own country. White people don't. Not South Africa, not Rhodesia, not America, nowhere. Any Jew from anywhere in the world can land at Ben Gurion airport and get immediate citizenship and the "basket" of goodies that the government gives to Jewish immigrants. Non-Jews can't immigrate to Israel at all. There are tens of thousands of "guest workers" brought in since the intifada to replace Palestinian labor, but their visas are strictly controlled, they are physically quarantined from the rest of the population, and after one year they're tossed on a plane back to the Philippines or wherever. But we can't have a program like that here, of course.

In America, once a wetback is past the border fence, he's pretty much in for life. Jews can build a wall to keep their version of mud people out. So far not one dollar has been appropriated by Congress and not one post hole has been dug to put up that fence along the southern border that Congress promised us with such a flourish just before the last election.

What, exactly, is it about Jews that gives them this special status, such that they alone of all the peoples of the earth get to have a non-diverse, non-multicultural country reserved for themselves alone and a few Palestinian slaves to serve their needs? Why exactly is it that white people cannot have the same privilege? Inquiring minds want to know!

Monday, July 23, 2007

Another Old Bromide

"If they don't name the Jew, their message isn't true."

-R. K. Chesterton

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Bush Outlaws All War Protest

Bush Outlaws All War Protest In United States
Citizens Face Full Asset Seizure

by Sorcha Faal


In one of his most chilling moves to date against his own citizens, the American War Leader has issued a sweeping order this week outlawing all forms of protest against the Iraq war.

President Bush enacted into US law an "Executive Order" on July 17th titled "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq", and which says:

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004."

According to legal experts, the points of greatest concern to the American people are the underlying provisions of this new law which are written so broadly as to outlaw all forms of protest against the war. These provisions state:

"(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken."

To the subsection of this new decree that says "...the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit...", the insertion of the word 'services' has broad, and catastrophic, consequences for the American people in that any act deemed by their government to be against the Iraqi war is, in fact, "supporting the enemy" and therefore threatens the "stabilization of Iraq."

© July 19, 2007 EU and US all rights reserved.


New Executive Order Stomps on the Fifth Amendment

"...any (citizen) person who undermines efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq."



Did anyone get the license plate of that Mack truck that ran us over yesterday? By executive order, the Secretary of the Treasury may now seize the property of anyone who opposes the war in Iraq

The Secretary may make his determination in secret and after the fact.

What's it say, you ask? The White House will decide if you are in any way "undermining efforts" in Iraq, or related to Iraq or pretty much anything else, the Treasury Department is authorized to seize your money, property, stocks, etc

Although good in overall notion (stop terrorist funding), the ridiculously broad language in this order takes the 5th amendment, and flushes it down the toilet. As an example, if it appears that if you, say, donate to a charity that the Bush administration determines, without any proof, is trying to undermine the Iraqi government, all of your assets can be frozen. No due process, do not pass go.

The order permits the targeting of those who aid someone else whose assets have been blocked under the order -- wittingly or not. And under Section Five, the government does not have to disclose which organizations are subject to having their assets frozen:

"For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order."

The scope of the order has raised civil-liberties concerns. "Certainly it is highly constitutionally questionable to empower the government to destroy someone economically without giving notice," says Bruce Fein, a Justice Department official in the Reagan administration. "This is so sweeping it's staggering. I've never seen anything so broad that it expands beyond terrorism, beyond seeking to use violence or the threat of violence to cower or intimidate a population. This covers stabilization in Iraq. I suppose you could issue an executive order about stabilization in Afghanistan as well. And it goes beyond even attempting violence, to cover those who pose 'a significant risk' of violence. Suppose Congress passed a law saying you've committed a crime if there's significant risk that you might commit a crime."

How does the Secretary of the Treasury feel about a t-shirt that says, 'Stop the War?' Is such a T-shirt considered destabilizing?


Saturday, July 21, 2007

Another Great Northwest Video!

Another great Northwest independence video is up on the NorthQuestPro site! Joe Bob says check it out!


Friday, July 20, 2007

I Am A Bad American

by George Carlin

I am your worst nightmare. I am a bad American.

I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid-level governmental functionary be he Democratic or Republican.

I'm in touch with my feelings and I like it that way.

I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.

I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized, and does not entitle you to anything.

I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, do it in English.

I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.

My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancelled Jerry Springer.

I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.

I know wrestling is fake and I don't waste my time watching or arguing about it.

I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, and neither have you. So, shut up already.

I believe if you don't like the way things are here, go back to where you came from and change your own country. This is AMERICA .

I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution. Can I get an amen on that one?

I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you're running from them.

I also think they have the right to pull you over if you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.

And, no, I don't mind having my face shown on my drivers license. I think it's good.....and I'm proud that "God" is written on my money.

I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.

I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause.

I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.

And what is going on with gas prices... again?

I believe "illegal" is illegal no matter what the lawyers think.

I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed in America.

If this makes me a bad American, then yes, I'm a bad American.

If you are a bad American too, please forward this to everyone you know. We want our country back!

Thursday, July 19, 2007

U.S. Preparing Domestic Clampdown

[I apologize for the length of this article, but it is an it is an important one, and everyone needs to read it and internalized its contents. Maybe my articles and novels have been noticed after all. Or else maybe Jug-Ears is preparing some stunt to cancel the elections and maintain himself in perpetual power, and he's expecting resistance. - HAC]

BAGHDAD -- "Yesterday, one of my good friends from another office was telling me they were going to start issuing armored vests to us office types because of the growing danger from mortars. We are being shelled daily and, like everything else, casualties are way underreported. But more important than the flak vests was a file he had copied out and which he gave to me to smuggle out of the country. As I have said, we have strict censorship here on all incoming and outgoing snail mail, email, phone calls and so on. This report is so serious I am making a précis of it and am even now sending it around to various news outlets, both Stateside and elsewhere. I have my sources and believe me, the CIC people here are so stupid they couldn't pour piss out of a boot if the directions were on the bottom.

It states that because of "growing popular unrest in the United States, caused by the prolonged war in Iraq, coupled with obvious Congressional inaction," the U.S. military has drawn up plans for combating domestic U.S. civil insurrections. This is not a theoretical study but a very specific one. Units to be used domestically are listed in detail as are detention centers, etc.

As a result of this, plans are now in train to segregate, retrain and reequip certain anti-insurgent U.S. military units now serving in Iraq and to prepare them for quick transfer back to the United States for use "as needed" The Pentagon command believes that such civil insurrections are not only a possibility but a very real probability in the event that the President and his advisors maintain their present course vis a vis the Iraqi war.

It is interesting to note that "foreign intelligence representatives, now active in the United States" (read Mossad) are to be subject to "arrest, confinement and eventual deportation to their country of origin."

The report and several attached ones, run to almost 900 pages and cannot be put up in their current form. However, I will list some of the more important data here:

Classification: Top Secret-Noforn as of 1 June 2007

Distribution Restriction: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to maintain operations security. This determination was made on 1 June 2007. Other requests for this document must be referred to (redacted)

Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

This publication uses the term insurgent to describe those taking part in any activity designed to undermine or to overthrow the established authorities. Counterinsurgency is those military, paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civic actions taken by a government to defeat insurgency (JP 1-02). It is an offensive approach involving all elements of national power; it can take place across the range of operations and spectrum of conflict. In dealing with the local populace, the primary aims must be to:

·Protect the population.

·Establish local political institutions.

·Reinforce local governments.

·Eliminate insurgent capabilities.

·Exploit information from local sources.

An insurgency is organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict (JP 1-02). It is a protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control. Political power is the central issue in an insurgency. An insurgent organization normally consists of four elements:


Combatants (main forces, regional forces, local forces).

Cadre (local political leaders that are also called the militants).

Mass base (the bulk of the membership).

A perceived serious potential of dissident American groups rising up against constituted authority has been clearly identified by counter-intelligence agencies. The stated cause for such an uprising appear to be growing dissatisfaction with the course and conduct of the war in Iraq, the chronic inability of Congress to deal with various pressing issues and the perception of widespread corruption and indifference to public needs. The support of the people, passive or active then, is the center of gravity. It must be gained in whatever proportion is necessary to sustain the insurgent movement (or, contrariwise, to defeat it). As in any political campaign, all levels of support are relative.

Insurgent movements begin as "fire in the minds of men." Insurgent leaders commit themselves to building a new world. They construct the organization to carry through this desire. Generally, popular grievances become insurgent causes when interpreted and shaped by the insurgent leadership. The insurgency grows if the cadre that is local insurgent leaders and representatives can establish a link between the insurgent movement and the desire for solutions to grievances sought by the local population. Insurgent leaders will exploit opportunities created by government security force actions. The behavior of security forces is critical. Lack of security force discipline leads to alienation, and security force abuse of the populace is a very effective insurgent recruiting tool. Consequently, specific insurgent tactical actions are often planned to frequently elicit overreaction from security force individuals and units.

Insurgencies are dynamic political movements, resulting from real or perceived grievance or neglect that leads to alienation from an established government. A successful counterinsurgency will result in the neutralization by the state of the insurgency and its effort to form a counterstate. While many abortive insurgencies are defeated by military and police actions alone, if an insurgency has tapped into serious grievances and has mobilized a significant portion of the population, simply returning to the status quo may not be an option. Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state, using all of its human and material resources. Security forces are only one such resource. The response must be multifaceted and coordinated, yet states typically charge their security forces with waging counterinsurgency. This the security forces cannot do alone. These imperatives are-

· Facilitate establishment or reestablishment of a 'legitimate government'.
· Counterinsurgency requires perseverance.

· Foster popular support for the incumbent US government.

· Prepare to perform functions and conduct operations that are outside normal scope of training.

· Coordinate with US governmental departments and agencies, and with vital non-governmental, agencies.

Urban operations.

· Protection of government facilities.

· Protection of infrastructure.

· Protection of commercial enterprises vital to the HN economy.

· Protection of cultural facilities.

· Prevention of looting.

· Military police functions.

· Close interaction with civilians.

· Assistance with reconstruction projects.

· Securing the national borders.

· Training or retraining a national military police and security force.

Establishing and maintaining local government credibility.

· Contributing local government is both tangible and psychological. Local security forces must reinforce and be integrated into the plan at every stage.

· Facilitate and use information and intelligence obtained from local sources to gain access to the insurgents' economic and social base of support, order of battle, tactics, techniques, and procedures.

Army forces help local pro-government police, paramilitary, and military forces perform counterinsurgency, area security, or local security operations. They advise and assist in finding, dispersing, capturing, and destroying the insurgent force. US forces may conduct offensive operations to disrupt and destroy insurgent combat formations. These operations prevent the insurgents from attacking government-controlled areas.

There are many organizations and extensive resources available to aid counterinsurgent forces. Commanders should not overlook the aid these organizations may provide. All forces assigned an AO or function should determine which departments and agencies are assisting in that AO and coordinate actions so that there is no duplication of effort. Such departments, councils and agencies include-

· National Security Council.

· Department of Defense.

· Department of State.

· Department of Justice.

· Department of the Treasury.

· Department of Homeland Security.

· Department of Agriculture.

· Department of Commerce.

· Central Intelligence Agency.

· Department of Transportation

Various governmental departments directly administer or support other governmental agencies. Examples of these US agencies are-

· The US Coast Guard (under Department of Homeland Security).

· The Federal Bureau of Investigation (under Department of Justice).

· Immigration Customs Enforcement (under Department of Homeland Security).

· Federal Communications Commission

The proper application of force is a critical component to any successful counterinsurgency operation. In a counterinsurgency, the center of gravity is public support. In order to defeat an insurgent force, US forces must be able to separate insurgents from the population. At the same time, US forces must conduct themselves in a manner that enables them to maintain popular domestic support. Excessive or indiscriminant [sic] use of force is likely to alienate the local populace, thereby increasing support for insurgent forces. Insufficient use of force results in increased risks to US forces and perceived weaknesses that can jeopardize the mission by emboldening insurgents and undermining domestic popular support. Achieving the appropriate balance requires a thorough understanding of the nature and causes of the insurgency, the end state, and the military's role in a counterinsurgency operation.
Nevertheless, US forces always retain the right to use necessary and proportional force for individual and unit self-defense in response to a hostile act or demonstrated hostile intent.

The media, print and broadcast (radio, television and the Internet), play a vital role in societies involved in a counterinsurgency. Members of the media have a significant influence and shaping impact on political direction, national security objectives, and policy and national will. The media is a factor in military operations. It is their right and obligation to report to their respective audiences on the use of military force. They demand logistic support and access to military operations while refusing to be controlled. Their desire for immediate footage and on-the-spot coverage of events, and the increasing contact with units and soldiers (for example, with embedded reporters) require commanders and public affairs officers to provide guidance to leaders and soldiers on media relations.

However, military planners must provide and enforce ground rules to the media to ensure operations security. Public affairs offices plan for daily briefings and a special briefing after each significant event because the media affect and influence each potential target audience external and internal to the AO. Speaking with the media in a forward-deployed area is an opportunity to explain what our organizations and efforts have accomplished. Continuous PSYOP are mounted to-

· Counter the effects of insurgent propaganda.

· Relate controls to the security and well-being of the population.

· Portray a favorable governmental image.

Control measures must-

· Be authorized by national laws and regulations (counterparts should be trained not to
improvise unauthorized measures).

· Be tailored to fit the situation (apply the minimum force required to achieve the desired result.)

· Be supported by effective local intelligence.

· Be instituted in as wide an area as possible to prevent bypass or evasion.

· Be supported by good communications.

· Be enforceable.

· Be lifted as the need diminishes.

· Be compatible, where possible, with local customs and traditions.

· Establish and maintain credibility of local government.

A control program may be developed in five phases:

· Securing and defending the area internally and externally.

· Organizing for law enforcement.

· Executing cordon and search operations.

· Screening and documenting the population (performing a detailed census).

· Performing public administration, to include resource control.

Support to the judiciary may be limited to providing security to the existing courts or may lead to more comprehensive actions to build local, regional, and national courts and the required support apparatus. To avoid overcrowding in police jails, the courts must have an efficient and timely magistrate capability, ideally co-located with police stations and police jails, to review cases for trial.

Cordon and search is a technique used by military and police forces in both urban and rural environments. It is frequently used by counterinsurgency forces conducting a population and resource control mission against small centers of population or subdivisions of a larger community. To be effective, cordon and search operations must have sufficient forces to effectively cordon off and thoroughly search target areas, to include subsurface areas.

PSYOP, civil affairs, and specialist interrogation teams should augment cordon and search orces to increase the effectiveness of operations. Consider the following when conducting cordon and search operations:

Cordon and search operations may be conducted as follows:

Disposition of troops should-

· Facilitate visual contact between posts within the cordon.

· Provide for adequate patrolling and immediate deployment of an effective re-serve force.

Priority should be given to-

· Sealing the administrative center of the community.

· Occupying all critical facilities.

· Detaining personnel in place.

· Preserving and securing all records, files, and other archives.

Key facilities include-

· Administrative buildings.

· Police stations.

· News media facilities.

· Post offices.

· Communications centers.

.Transportation offices and motor pools.

· Prisons and other places of detention.

· Schools.

· Medical facilities.

Search Techniques include-

· Search teams of squad size organized in assault, support, and security elements.
One target is assigned per team.

· Room searches are conducted by two-person teams.

· Room search teams are armed with pistols, assault weapons, and automatic weapons.

· Providing security for search teams screening operations and facilities.

Pre-search coordination includes-

· Between control personnel and screening team leaders.

· Study of layout plans.

· Communications, that is, radio, whistle, and hand signals.

· Disposition of suspects.

· On-site security.

· Guard entrances, exits (to include the roof), halls, corridors, and tunnels.

· Assign contingency tasks for reserve.

· Room searches conducted by two- or three-person teams.

· Immobilize occupants with one team member.

· Search room with other team member.

· Search all occupants. When available, a third team member should be the re-corder.

· Place documents in a numbered envelope and tag the associated individual with a corresponding number.


Screening and documentation include following:

· Systematic identification and registration.

· Issuance of individual identification cards containing-

A unique number.

Picture of individual.

Personal identification data.


An official stamp (use different colors for each administration region).

Family group census cards, an official copy of which is retained at the local police agency. These must include a picture and appropriate personal data.
Frequent use of mobile and fixed checkpoints for inspection, identification, and registration of documents.

Preventing counterfeiting of identification and registration documents by laminating and embossing.

Programs to inform the population of the need for identification and registration.
Covert surveillance is a collection effort with the responsibility fixed at the intelligence/security division or detective division of the police department. Covert techniques, ranging from application of sophisticated electronics systems to informants, should include-

Informant nets. Reliability of informants should be verified. Protection of identity is a must.

Block control. Dividing a community or populated area into zones where a trusted resident reports on the activities of the population. If the loyalty of block leaders is questionable, an informant net can be established to verify questionable areas.
Units designated for counterinsurgency operations

· 115th MIB, Schofield, HI

· 704th MIB, Fort Made, MD, Collaboration with NSA

· 513st MIB, Fort Gordon, GA in Collaboration with NSA

· Arlington Hall Station, VA

· Aberdeen Proving Ground (Maryland)

· US Army Intelligence and Security Command INSCOM- Huachuca ( Arizona )

· INTELLIGENCE THREAT and ANALYSIS CENTER ( Center Analysis for threat and Intelligence )

· 501st Military Intelligence Brigade EAC

· 3rd Military Intelligence Battalion Exploitation Area

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

No More Integration

[Got an e-mail on that Supreme Court decision last month that finally backed off school integration after 53 years. - HAC]

In an amazing moment of clarity, one justice remarked "it is unclear whether increased interracial contact improves racial attitudes and relations."

Well I'll be damned. You mean seating me next to a negro doesn't mean I'll grow to like him? Great find!

That's one of the most ironic things about racial politics in America.

From the 1950s to today, bleeding heart liberals, who had little if any experience with ordinary blacks, would accuse White Southerners of being "ignorant" for not liking blacks.

Exactly what were the White Southerners ignorant of? If anything, they had much more experience with blacks than any sane person would want to have.

I suppose there's been one improvement since blacks became a widespread problem outside the South. Aside from politicians and Jews, I almost never hear a White man talking about "poor oppressed blacks" anymore.

-Mr. T.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Insane Jews Plan Nuclear Sneak Atttack

If the Sunday Times of London, one of the most reputable and painstakingly accurate newspapers in the world, is right, then all of humanity is facing a crisis which no one on earth dares ignore.

It is entirely possible that the Jewish people, having finally gotten the message that they will not be allowed to rule the world, have decided to exercise what the Israeli government once designated as "the Samson Option." They are going to launch a nuclear first strike against Iran, and destroy human civilization as we know it in the process.

The Times article states that "Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons. Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear bunker-busters, according to several Israeli military sources. The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki."

According to the Times, the Jews are going to use nukes because "Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene."

In other words, if the Democrats in Congress or the few remaining sane elements in the Republican party, or even the American military itself, is able to prevent Jug-Ears from attacking Iran, then the Jews intend to start the true War to End All Wars (and everything else) by acting all on their own.

This is instructive. In the White House we have an increasingly disturbed and paranoid U. S. President with his hand on the button, but we need to remember that even if somehow his twitching fingers can be wrenched away from that button, the monster that we have created in the Middle East could still destroy the earth.

Let us examine what would happen in the event of a nuclear attack on Iran. In the first place, this would be absolutely the last straw for the Muslim world. The few remaining American and Israeli puppet regimes in places like Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt would almost certainly be overthrown by massive Islamic mobs in a spontaneous act of region-wide revolution, drowning those regimes in blood.

Iran would immediately close off the Straits of Hormuz, which would cut off 40% of the West's oil coming from Iraq and Iran right there, but it is virtually certain that we would also lose the oil fields in Saudi Arabia and the Emirates. In Pakistan, the Musharraf regime would almost certainly fall, and Pakistan already has nukes--so Osama Bin Laden would end up with some nice toys to play with.

The loss of the majority of its crude oil supply would completely wreck the economy of the West. Literally everything would break down, because even non-petroleum products require petroleum for manufacturing and transport at various stages. America would be forced back to the eighteenth century in a matter of a few years or maybe even months. The power would go out all across the United States and stay off; we would probably lose contact with Europe and the rest of the world and the rest of our own country, because there would be no fuel for planes and cars or diesel for trains (we not only destroyed America's railroads, we got rid of the last steam engines half a century ago.)

The race war everyone has been predicted for seventy years would break out, and millions of fat, lazy, and weak white couch potatoes would be butchered by the black and brown hordes. There would be a total governmental collapse and Israel itself would find itself friendless and just as badly hit as everybody else--until the Muslims roll over it in millions and tear those Jews to pieces with their bare hands.


You know, it would almost be worth it to finally get that Jewish monkey off the world's back.

On second thought--go ahead, Jews. Nuke Iran. Sometimes the only way to get rid of the rats is to burn down the barn.