Friday, June 22, 2007

Why Do We Not Kill Them?

[Another trip down memory with Alex Curtis.]

Date : Fri, 11 Aug 2000

If you are not willing to kill for your children, you might as well kill yourselves.

"History" evolving from day-to-day even as we watch offers so much justification for whites killing their enemies that I begin to wonder if the being-fleeced-as-white-as-snow sheeple might not be better off simply presenting their throats immediately to the Jewish ritual butcher?

We have laws uniquely applied to whites, where "hate" graffiti in a sinagogue merits a life sentence, while one white girl impaled by pre-teen jiglets was said to be only "a victim of attempted youthful purse-snatching".

While the most monstrous freaktures walk the inner shitty streets, the most vapid soul-less media vampires pretend they don't even exist. And the "progressive" Jew world culture may actually be worse than being tortured to death, seeing how slowly and methodically it grinds and saws on through the white racial body.

Public Jewniversities in those U. S. states with the lowest % of niggers are so self-hating that, in a rush to seek the minuscule number of niggers with IQs over 85 to meet their racial quota targets, they are telling alumni they will only accept private contributions for full minority scholarships, full now meaning to include spending money. "If 10 years from now, this institution is not more diverse than it currently is, the major international (Jewish) companies in this country will not recruit from here," University of Wisconsin-Madison Chancellor David Ward said. Was a white child ever so graced?

Progress! North America has the lowest percentage of tobacco smokers worldwide, at 4.7%. Ah, but the annual survey conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, estimates 5.0% are regular users of illicit drugs, along with 16.1% of those aged 18 to 25. This is also progress by the New Jew definition.

Count then the number of Americans using Jewpsych-prescribed mind-numbing estimated 6.1% of all U.S. whites of any age! Is that enough? Hardly!

Researchers with names like Goldman, Genel, Bezman, Slanetz, Milberger, Silverthorn, Kuper, Gittelman, Shenker, Horowitz, Pollock, and Schell claim that a minimum 10-20% of young white males would benefit from long-term chemical preventative treatment for "antisocial behaviors, substance abuse, and psychopathology. "And while some 2% of males and less than 1% of females are actually homosexual, Jewish psychologists almost universally agree that a minimum 10-20% of young white males would benefit from youthful homosexual experiences in reducing "tendencies toward violence, aggression, judgmental prejudice, and the always-associated psychopathology".

Hmmmm, well over 50% of sex crimes against little white boys are committed by fags, and what do these Jewish psychiatrists, sociologists, psychologists, counselors, and academicians say? That this is "no more serious a problem than the overrepresentation of African-Americans arrested for violent crime." Thus, if blacks are 10 times more likely to commit violent crime and fags are 50 times more likely to commit babyboy rape, this is simply a matter of "overrepresentation". Mein Gott, shouldn't these people then also be "overrepresented" swinging by a rope from a tree or trussed up as fence scarecrows!?

Many of these and other researchers with berg, gold or silver in their names also suggest the same % of young white males would again "benefit" from exposure to "pornography selected for casual non-violence" in order to prevent them from becoming "patriarchal rapists of their wives and girlfriends". All white girls would of course equally benefit from being shown hard-core bulldyke and interracial porn "sometime in or after the 5th grade", so they "begin to understand their own sexual options".

Lord, if we are not killing now, why not?

Why shouldn't white society at large in the bloody fields and streets and soulless places of learning have a right to commit crimes against the real criminals?!

If a visitor from the future showed up to hand me a bio-terror vial that broken open would kill all non-whites, Jews and homos, and half of all whites, do you think I'd hesitate for a nanosecond before smashing it to the ground?

This, then, is your future, white trash! The best 10-20% of all white kids will be drugged, brainwashed, sodomized, raped and beaten. After all, one group's "progressive tradition" is always another's nightmare. If the parents will not kill for them, are today's white kids actually better off stumbling under a hail of nigger blows to an old age, being gnawed on by the Jewish social rat their entire lives?

Now Lord...where's that vial?


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very good and very true.....

3:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We don't kill them because we're fucking cowards, because we care more for our own safety and comfort than we do for our children.

8:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You've made a much stronger point in this comment than you realize.

Let's look at it:

"If a visitor from the future showed up to hand me a bio-terror vial that broken open would kill all non-whites, Jews and homos, and half of all whites, do you think I'd hesitate for a nanosecond before smashing it to the ground?"

The phrase, "half of all whites." is really more important than it may seem, at first glance.

I am just amazed that about ninety percent of our nominally racial brethren see US as 'the Enemy," and if we try to Awaken them, however softly, however slowly, we risk them turning on us like something out of "Invasion of The Body Snatchers."

A lot of Really Bad things have to happen before we can make substantial changes in any manner, to any degree.

And, frankly, that's just fine.

A friend of mine and his wife retired, and "took the Gap" to Northern Idaho, after having spent their lives in a major city.

They said it was like they had lived in prison all of their lives, and the blinders finally came off.

They leave the keys in their car's ignition, sleep with the windows open, and are having their relatives - those who have lost most everything in the NAFTA/China/India economy - move out with them, using THIS phrase in the closing of all of their correspondence:

"Why fight to live in Hell, when you can live in Heaven for free?"

Good point.

You can't make the money in Heaven you can in Hell, but you really don't need much money to live, at all, IF you are serious.

It is to the point, they said, that every reason for NOT moving is not a reason, it's a rationalization, based on fear of change, and hope that, somehow, as if by magic, tomorrow will become the best of yesterday, Ozzie and Harriet will return, and the Cleavers will show us all how to live a good life.

There is a compelling phrase at the beginning of the movie, "The Matrix." Agent Smith says to the supervising cop, "Lieutenant, your men are already dead. They just don't know it, yet."

So is The Old World...

7:53 AM  
Anonymous Epimetheus said...

What I resent most is the idea that we should have to leave our own land and territory because it has been stolen from us.

One stay's in the cities to fight for control, and that is the only good reason I can see.

9:37 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home