Saturday, June 30, 2007

Did Imus Threaten To Expose 9/11 Secrets?

Now that the Russians have thrown off the rule of Jewish oligarchs such as the loathsome Boris Berezovsky, and are returning to a more nationalist frame of mind, some interesting things are starting emerge in the once heavily Jew-controlled Russian media.

A recent article in Pravda says, "In a clear sign of its intent to rein in dissident American media personalities, and their growing influence in American culture, US War Leaders this past month launched an unprecedented attack upon one of their most politically 'connected', and legendary, radio hosts named Don Imus after his threats to release information relating to the September 11, 2001 attacks upon that country....

"According to European reports of the events surrounding Don Imus that have gripped the United States this past week, it was during an interview with another American media personality, Tim Russert, who is the host of a television programme frequently used by US War Leaders, wherein while decrying the state of care being given to American War wounded stated, 'So those bastards want to keep these boys secret? (sic) Let's see how they like it if I start talking about their secrets, starting with 9/11.'"

Pravda goes on: "Unable to attack such a powerful media figure as Don Imus directly, the US War Leaders, and as we have seen many times before, resorted to a massive media attack against him using as the reason a racial slur against a US woman's basketball team, but which has been pointed out by other media outlets was not by any means a rare occurrence for the legendary radio icon to make. To the US War Leaders, Don Imus represented the most serious threat, to date, of the growing assault against them by America's media personalities threatening to expose the truths behind the events of September 11, 2001 and the Iraq/Afghanistan Wars; and to such an extent that another American media personality, Rosie O'Donnell, has expressed concern that US Military Leaders could actually imprison Mr. Imus. "

Okay, that shows you that Russians still don't quite get how screwed up American society is. Nobody takes anything Rosie O'Donnell says seriously. Not even most liberals are that whacked out.

The journalist's English is getting a bit strained here, but the Russki has a point. Imus has certainly run his mouth before, with far more candor than his "nappy-headed ho's" comment. Maybe this is a bit of a stretch, but it is certainly true that the Establishment is getting very worried about the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement," mostly on the internet, that questions the official version of events on September 11th, 2001.

Pravda continues, "From our past research of the tactics used against those threatening America's War Leaders, the likelihood of imprisonment for Don Imus would only occur should he persist in his threats to undermine their authority, and which appears, at this time, unlikely after the public disgrace he has had to endure."

Mmm..actually, it probably had more to do with Al Sharpton's desire to distract attention away from the Duke Lacrosse Three kids having all their charges dropped and corrupt Durham D.A. Mike Nifong ending up with egg all over his face, than anything to do with 9/11, and Don Imus was just a target of opportunity.

Nonetheless, actor Charlie Sheen is supposed to be involved in a movie project that would discuss a lot of the 9/11 Truth Movement's main points about the events at the World Trade Center on that day and pose some serious questions. Personally, I have always wanted to know what the story was behind the Israeli "art students" who were wandering around the country that summer trying to gain entry to American top-secret installations, and just what was the story on those four Israelis who were arrested on a rooftop near the towers filming as the planes crashed into the buildings--while jumping up and down and cheering. Debunking and deconstructing 9/11 would certainly be a major blow to Bush and his little Jewish neoconservative friends.

Anyone interested in learning more about the 9/11 Truth Movement can check out

Thursday, June 28, 2007

A Personal Message From Harold A. Covington

Dear Racial Comrades,

53 years ago, when I was nine months old, the United States Supreme Court handed down a historic and terrible decision called Brown vs. Board of Education.

That decision destroyed my life, and the lives of two subsequent generations of White children who have been effectively denied an education, because a child cannot learn in the presence of dangerous and violent animals with skins the color of shit who foul their nest with their own excrement.

It would be difficult for me to encompass, and impossible for me to overstate, the catastrophic consequences that Brown vs. Board of Education has had for America, and for people like me who have been forced to grow up in its shadow. I do not believe I am overstating the case when I say that all of the many, many subsequent evils which have destroyed the America into which I was born, originated in that one act of judicial folly and madness.

Today, June 28th, 2007, in a moment of lucidity such as those which occasionally befall a far-gone Alzheimer's patient, America briefly recovered its sanity. The United States Supreme Court has reversed that terrible judicial fiat which destroyed my life and millions of others back when I was still in the cradle. In two decisions involving the public school systems in Seattle and Louisville, they effectively brought the racial integration of the public schools to an end, in the legal sense, anyway, although I'm sure the dying integration monster still has some spasmodic twitches of life in it.

Nor can the damage of three generations be undone. Any moron can make an aquarium into fish soup, but no one can turn fish soup back into an aquarium.
But at least America has admitted that it was wrong, albeit 53 years too late. There are some who might tell me that at least now I can face my declining years with that inner satisfaction, knowing that those nine old swine admitted they were wrong. I don't see it that way.

I look at it it like this: okay, you rotting insects in your black robes--you've admitted you were wrong. Now give me back my life, the life I should have had, the life I would have had, if your predecessors had not decided to yield to the yowlings of the black beasts and the whisperings in their ear of a race of alien Asiatic parasites.

Give me back the youth I should have had. Give me back the future I should have had in 1971 when I graduated from the little corner of hell on earth that you created. Give me back the world that I had a right to, and which you stole from me.

Okay, America, you've admitted that you made a mistake. A mistake that I have already paid for. Now what are you going to tell me? "Oops, my bad?" No. America has fucked me over, and I'm going to return the favor.

Give me back my life, God damn you!

Or else I promise you, I will devote whatever time I have left on this earth to taking yours.

-Harold A. Covington

Whites Older, Dying Out

How many times must the warning be shouted out? How many times must we point out the fact that the White race is disappearing from the face of the earth and we had damned well better do something about it while we can, while some of us can still get around without walkers and wheel chairs?

The New York Times reports, "With the number of nonwhite Americans above 100 million for the first time, demographers are identifying an emerging racial generation gap. That development may portend a nation split between an older, whiter electorate and a younger overall population that is more Hispanic, black and Asian and that presses sometimes competing agendas and priorities."

Yes, I would call taking over the entire country and destroying Western civilization and the people who created it a "competing agenda and priority."

The Times continues: "The Census Bureau estimated yesterday that from July 1, 2005, to July 1, 2006, the nation’s minority population grew to 100.7 million from 98.3 million; that is about one in three of all Americans. The new figures also suggest that many states are growing more diverse as minorities disperse. As a result of immigration" (notice the deliberate absence of the word "illegal") "and higher birthrates among many newcomers, the number of Hispanics grew by 3.4 percent nationwide and Asians by 3.2 percent. Meanwhile, the black population rose by 1.3 percent, and that of non-Hispanic whites by 0.3 percent. (The number of American Indians and Alaska Natives increased by 1 percent, and Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders by 1.7 percent.) More than 20 percent of children in the United States either are foreign-born or have a parent who was born abroad. Nearly half the children under age 5 are Hispanic, black or Asian. Over all, the median age of Americans reached 36.6 years, another record high. It ranged from 27.4 among Hispanics to 40.5 among non-Hispanic whites."

Okay, let's go over this again. Racially conscious White people are now a tiny minority in the country we created and which we once ruled. The overwhelming majority even of white people are now part of the problem rather than part of the solution, because they have their heads up their asses, and they support the existing liberal democratic system which is destroying their race. Within a century or so, there will be no more White people in North America, possibly none left in the world outside maybe a few pockets in northern Canada and eastern Europe.
Every year or so some article comes out like this on the "browning Of America." We circulate it among ourselves by e-mail and maybe post it to a couple of web sites, we wring our hands and weep and lament for our lost glories, and then by common consent the subject quietly dies away as we find more newspaper clippings to e-mail one another. It is simply too painful for us to deal with, so like so much else, we simply pretend it's not happening.
No doubt we will still be pretending when they come to drag us away to the nursing home, our fingers twitching as the black and brown "orderlies" load our ancient bodies up into the Fogey Farm wagon, seeking the mouse to send out one more news clipping on how awful it all is.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

A Murdered Friend Remembered

Dear Harold,

I'm writing you this because I keep thinking about this story. Perhaps something for on your website or your mailing list? I'm willing to write an article about it if you want me to.

On the 3th of October last year, someone I knew was murdered. His name was Joost Vastenhouw and he was 22 years of age. He was murdered by the Chinese homemate/boyfriend of his father, who hacked him up with an axe while Joost was behind his pc, stripped the flesh from his bones and fried it afterwards. This because, as the murderer claimed, Joost had an evil spirit inside him and because Joost's gods were at war for hundreds of years with the murderer's gods.

Joost was a member af the National Socialist black metal group Calslagen and someone I regularly met at concerts and at the annual viking market in Joost's hometown of Alphen aan den Rijn. I heard the rumours about him being murdered, but I found out for sure just this weekend, because his murderer stood on trial last Friday. Because the murderer is completely crazy, he is not accountable for his deeds. Therefore, he received forced treatment (I don't know how to say this in English) in jail instead of punishment.

Although he was not a regular visitor of demonstrations and meetings, Joost was a well-known face in the nationalistic scene. Among the first comments after it became clear that he'd been murdered, were reactions such as "no wonder if you are involved in the extreme-right scene". But that was before the people who said those things found out that it was one of their so-beloved foreigners who killed yet another white person.

There was almost no media exposure of this murder here, despite the fact that a murder of this sort is almost unprecedented in Holland. The words cover-up come to mind. But cover-up or no cover-up, my heart weeps for the tragic fate of this boy whom I knew as friendly and cheerful and the tragic fate of yet another white life.

The Netherlands

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

The White Holocaust Memorial

Okay, people listen up: I have had a brainstorm. I have finally figured out something that we can all do, and we can do it from a seated position, which is the White man's favorite (and pretty much only) position these days. You don't have to send any of your precious beer money to me or anyone else. You don't have to incur any personal risk or inconvenience. You don't have to reveal your identities; you can continue to hide. In short, this idea is uniquely suited to our so-called "Movement."

It will require only a small number of people whose computer skills are better than my own, and a larger number of people who are willing to do what "White Nationalists" do best--hunt down black and Mexican crime and atrocity stories on the internet telling us all how bad things are, as if we didn't know, and e-mail them to others.

And--here's the kicker--this might actually have a very serious propaganda effect on the American public at large, if we can somehow manage to do it and not just tap tap tap to one another on our computers about doing it.

Here is the concept: a White Holocaust Memorial website on the internet. One big, huge website wherein there are lists, endless list after list, of White people who have been murdered, raped, tortured, brutalized, and degraded by black and Hispanic and other non-White beasts, going all the way back to 1954. I envision, eventually, a kind of central archive, a mass list, that will begin the gargantuan historical task of quantifying all the bloodshed, the grief, and the suffering that racial integration and "diversity" and "multiculturalism" have inflicted on the white population of the Western world since 1954, the year of Brown vs. Board of Education. I would like eventually to see a list of thousands and thousands of names, dates, and where possible photographs of the victims, along with a brief paragraph describing what happened to the victim and the race of the attackers, etc.

This will not be so much an NPA project as it will be a group effort on the part of the entire White Nationalist internet community. I don't care if my own name appears anywhere on the site.

I will need at least a couple of volunteer webmasters who know computers inside and out, who know HTML like a second language, who have some experience constructing web sites, who have access to reliable server space, and who are sufficiently dedicated to be willing to devote some time and effort to this project, and not just lose interest after a couple of weeks and wander off, like we normally do. Whoever volunteers, please--don't do it if you're not going to be able to crack that short Amurrican attention span and stay focused. This will be a long-term thing, maybe even a lifetime thing, who knows?

This is do-able, people, even with the slim to non-existent resources at our command. As with so much, it's not a question of whether we can do this. It's a question of whether we will do it, or whether we just can't be bothered because the Simpsons is on tonight.

Monday, June 25, 2007

Retiring At 85

It is by now common knowledge that Social Security is a god-awful mess and will be bankrupt in a matter of years, how soon exactly no one seems to be quite certain or able to predict. One of the ways the government can fix the present mess is to stop paying benefits, and one way to do that is to keep on raising the full retirement age, which used to be 65 but is now 67.

In what may be some kind of neo-con trial balloon, a US biologist has said that the age of retirement should be raised to 85 by 2050 because of trends in life expectancy. Shripad Tuljapurkar (this is a "US biologist?") of Stanford University says anti-ageing advances could raise life expectancy by a year each year over the next two decades.

This, of course, presumes that ordinary working people will be able to afford to gain the benefit of all the advances in modern medical research, which is about as likely as a snowstorm in hell. Tuljapurkar told the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting in St. Louis that continuing to allow people to retire in their 60s "will put a strain on economies around the world."

The Stanford researcher has been looking at relationships between historical trends in ageing, population growth and economic activity. Based on this, he came up with a scenario in which anti-ageing technologies will increase the most common age of death by one year per year between 2010 and 2030.

This is optimistic at best, in my view, and apparently takes no account of the fact that America's health services are being strained to the breaking point by millions of non-paying illegal aliens, and collapsing into squalor and incompetence through the employment of massive numbers of Third Worlders, many of them also illegal. True, the very wealthy who can afford to get top-notch health care will live longer, but average people's life spans may well decrease as they have in places like Haiti and Zimbabwe.

"People are going to do things they didn't get round to in their working lives. Current institutions are really not equipped at the moment to deal with such long lives," Dr Tuljapurkar said, apparently aghast at the prospect of millions of septuagenarian Baby Boomers rolling around the continent in RVs and spending their childrens' inheritance. I don't imagine the children are too happy with it, either.

But is the solution really to make the poor old folks keep on working until they're 85? What kind of quality work, really, can someone in their 80s do? Okay, depending on the job and the individual, yes, there would be some competent octogenarians. But given their health problems (and we still don't have a single-payer health system in this country, the only nation in the world with any pretense to civilization that does not) and all of the other difficulties associated with human beings getting that old, do we really want an 80 year-old bus driver taking us to work in the morning, working on the jet airliner engine of the plane we'll be flying in, or processing seriously necessary paperwork?

Frankly, this sounds like someone up top is contemplating solving the impending Social Security crisis through simply eliminating the whole concept of retirement, keeping on taking the money, and waiting for the last of the old Caucasian population to die in harness.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

More Ron Paul Quotes

In this "expose" from 1996, the Houston Chronicle tried (and failed) to derail Paul's Congressional bid by printing the following quotes made by Paul regarding race and the dangers posed by Zionism:

"Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action," Paul wrote.

Paul continued that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered "as decent people." Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote: "Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.

Paul also wrote that although "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."

He added, "We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

The same article quoted Paul as having this to say with regards to the Zionist lobby:

Stating that lobbying groups who seek special favors and handouts are evil, Paul wrote, "By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the bad sort is the Israeli government" and that the goal of the Zionist movement is to stifle criticism.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

July Northwest Observer

Northwest Observer #61, for July 2007, went into the mail today. For a sample copy e-mail me at or

Friday, June 22, 2007

Why Do We Not Kill Them?

[Another trip down memory with Alex Curtis.]

Date : Fri, 11 Aug 2000

If you are not willing to kill for your children, you might as well kill yourselves.

"History" evolving from day-to-day even as we watch offers so much justification for whites killing their enemies that I begin to wonder if the being-fleeced-as-white-as-snow sheeple might not be better off simply presenting their throats immediately to the Jewish ritual butcher?

We have laws uniquely applied to whites, where "hate" graffiti in a sinagogue merits a life sentence, while one white girl impaled by pre-teen jiglets was said to be only "a victim of attempted youthful purse-snatching".

While the most monstrous freaktures walk the inner shitty streets, the most vapid soul-less media vampires pretend they don't even exist. And the "progressive" Jew world culture may actually be worse than being tortured to death, seeing how slowly and methodically it grinds and saws on through the white racial body.

Public Jewniversities in those U. S. states with the lowest % of niggers are so self-hating that, in a rush to seek the minuscule number of niggers with IQs over 85 to meet their racial quota targets, they are telling alumni they will only accept private contributions for full minority scholarships, full now meaning to include spending money. "If 10 years from now, this institution is not more diverse than it currently is, the major international (Jewish) companies in this country will not recruit from here," University of Wisconsin-Madison Chancellor David Ward said. Was a white child ever so graced?

Progress! North America has the lowest percentage of tobacco smokers worldwide, at 4.7%. Ah, but the annual survey conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, estimates 5.0% are regular users of illicit drugs, along with 16.1% of those aged 18 to 25. This is also progress by the New Jew definition.

Count then the number of Americans using Jewpsych-prescribed mind-numbing estimated 6.1% of all U.S. whites of any age! Is that enough? Hardly!

Researchers with names like Goldman, Genel, Bezman, Slanetz, Milberger, Silverthorn, Kuper, Gittelman, Shenker, Horowitz, Pollock, and Schell claim that a minimum 10-20% of young white males would benefit from long-term chemical preventative treatment for "antisocial behaviors, substance abuse, and psychopathology. "And while some 2% of males and less than 1% of females are actually homosexual, Jewish psychologists almost universally agree that a minimum 10-20% of young white males would benefit from youthful homosexual experiences in reducing "tendencies toward violence, aggression, judgmental prejudice, and the always-associated psychopathology".

Hmmmm, well over 50% of sex crimes against little white boys are committed by fags, and what do these Jewish psychiatrists, sociologists, psychologists, counselors, and academicians say? That this is "no more serious a problem than the overrepresentation of African-Americans arrested for violent crime." Thus, if blacks are 10 times more likely to commit violent crime and fags are 50 times more likely to commit babyboy rape, this is simply a matter of "overrepresentation". Mein Gott, shouldn't these people then also be "overrepresented" swinging by a rope from a tree or trussed up as fence scarecrows!?

Many of these and other researchers with berg, gold or silver in their names also suggest the same % of young white males would again "benefit" from exposure to "pornography selected for casual non-violence" in order to prevent them from becoming "patriarchal rapists of their wives and girlfriends". All white girls would of course equally benefit from being shown hard-core bulldyke and interracial porn "sometime in or after the 5th grade", so they "begin to understand their own sexual options".

Lord, if we are not killing now, why not?

Why shouldn't white society at large in the bloody fields and streets and soulless places of learning have a right to commit crimes against the real criminals?!

If a visitor from the future showed up to hand me a bio-terror vial that broken open would kill all non-whites, Jews and homos, and half of all whites, do you think I'd hesitate for a nanosecond before smashing it to the ground?

This, then, is your future, white trash! The best 10-20% of all white kids will be drugged, brainwashed, sodomized, raped and beaten. After all, one group's "progressive tradition" is always another's nightmare. If the parents will not kill for them, are today's white kids actually better off stumbling under a hail of nigger blows to an old age, being gnawed on by the Jewish social rat their entire lives?

Now Lord...where's that vial?

Thursday, June 21, 2007

The Burial of Latane (1862)

The combat ranged not long, but ours the day;
And through the hosts that compassed us around
Our little band rode proudly on its way,
Leaving one gallant comrade, glory-crowned,
Unburied on the field he died to gain,
Single of all his men amid the hostile slain.

One moment on the battle's edge he stood,
Hope's halo like a helmet round his hair,
The next beheld him, dabbled in his blood,
Prostrate in death, and yet in death how fair!
Even thus he passed through the red gate of strife,
From earthly crowns and palms to an immortal life.

A brother bore his body from the field
And gave it unto stranger's hands that closed
The calm, blue eyes on earth forever sealed,
And tenderly the slender limbs composed:
Strangers, yet sisters, who with Mary's love,
Sat by the open tomb and weeping looked above.

A little child strewed roses on his bier,
Pale roses, not more stainless than his soul.
Nor yet more fragrant than his life sincere
That blossomed with good actions, brief, but whole:
The aged matron and the faithful slave
Approached with reverent feet the hero's lowly grave.

No man of God might say the burial rite
Above the "rebel"-- thus declared the foe
That blanched before him in the deadly fight.
But woman's voice, in accents soft and low,
Trembling with pity, touched with pathos, read
Over his hallowed dust the ritual for the dead.

"'Tis sown in weakness, it is raised in power,"
Softly the promise floated on the air,
And the sweet breathings of the sunser hour
Came back responsive to the mourner's prayer;
Gently they laid him underneath the sod,
And left him with his fame, his country, and his God.

Let us not weep for him whose deeds endure,
So young, so brave, so beautiful, he died;
As he had wished to die; the past is sure,
Whatever yet of sorrow may betide
Those who still linger by the stormy shore,
Change cannot harm him now nor fortune touch him more.

And when Virginia, leaning on her spear,
Victrix et vidua; the conflict done,
Shall raise her mailed hand to wipe the tear
That starts as she recalls each martyred son,
No prouder memory her breast shall sway,
Than thine, our early-lost, lamented Latane.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Ron Paul On The Civil War

"I think there would have been a better way. Every other major country of the world was able to get rid of slavery without a Civil War. The Civil War wasn't fought over slavery anyway; the war was fought over unifying and making a strong centralized state. You could have paid for all the slaves and released them and there were proposals like that; that's the way the British did it. Every major country in the world got rid of slavery except us; it was not necessary and there were tariffs involved and many other reasons why the Civil War was fought. But if you read Lincoln carefully you'll realize that Lincoln was not the greatest opponent of slavery and if you don't look at that you are denying a very important part of our history."

-Ron Paul

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

The Disgrace of North Carolina Jewstice

The Associated Press reports that "Duke University has reached an undisclosed financial settlement with three former lacrosse players falsely accused of rape, while a judge said late Monday he would order the disbarred prosecutor to leave office immediately. "

So, Mike Nifong won't be allowed to enjoy the office that he almost bought with the innocent blood of two white youths and one Jew. Question: will he also be barred from running for the General Assembly or other political office using his "base" in Durham's savage, white-hating "black community" as a springboard? Because sure as God made little green apples, that's what he's going to do.

Nifong was recently disbarred, when his total corruption, his complete lack of any moral scruple, and his vicious persecution of the three lacrosse players who were falsely accused of rape by a monkoid stripper named Crystal Gayle Mangum became too embarrassing even for the putrescent North Carolina court system to tolerate. Now, among other things, every case this asshole ever worked on is going to have to be reviewed for signs of incompetence, malfeasance, and political manipulation and God knows how many real criminals will be released because this evil son of a bitch sold his race and sold his soul for a paltry handful of nigger votes.

Now, imagine: you're in a North Carolina court, and Mike Nifong isn't the prosecutor, he's the judge. This is how a certain dissident writer was in effect sentenced to a Soviet-style internal exile some years ago, in violation of every Constitutional precept. Down Carolina was they got ways o' dealin' with uppity white boys who embarrass the rich folks in the big house.

Monday, June 18, 2007

The latest "election news" is that John McCain is supposedly "slipping" in the South Carolina Republican primary polls.

Of course McCain doesn't have a hope in hell of being elected President. His policies and positions are moronic, but no more so than the other Republican aspirants. McCain will never be elected because of the simple fact that he looks like Mr. Potato Head. Yes, as a nation, we really are shallow.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Mark Twain on the Jews

Mark Twain's true opinion of the Jews is probably the best kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married a Jewish piano player, Otto Gabrilowitsch. Twain's publishers were given speedy instructions to delete "Concerning the Jews" from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg and Other Stories. The following is taken from Harper's Monthly Magazine, September 1899, as quoted in William Grimstad's Anti-Zion:

Concerning The Jews
by Mark Twain

Can fanaticism alone account for the persecution of the Jews? It is now my conviction that it is responsible for hardly any of it.

In this connection I call to mind Genesis, chapter 47. We have all read the story of the years of plenty and the years of famine in Egypt, and how Joseph with that opportunity, made a corner in broken hearts, and the crusts of the poor, and human liberty---a corner whereby he took away the nation's money to the last penny; took a nation's livestock all away, to the last hoof; took a nation's land all away, to the last acre. Then he took the nation itself, buying it for bread, man by man, woman by woman, child by child, till all were slaves; a corner which took everything, leaving nothing, a corner so stupendous that by comparison with it, the most gigantic corners in subsequent history are but baby things; for it dealt in hundreds of millions of bushels, and its profits were reckoned by the hundreds of millions of dollars. It was a disaster so crushing that its effects have not wholly disappeared from Egypt even today, more than 3,000years after the event.

Was Joseph establishing a character for his race which survived long in Egypt, and in time would his name be familiarly used to express that character---like Shylock's? It was hardly to be doubted. Let us remember that this was centuries before the Crucifixion.

In the U. S. cotton states, after the war, the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the negroes' wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long the whites detested the Jew.

The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop, and the next year he owned the farm, like Joseph.

In the England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later.

In all ages, Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poorhouse. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, but not for the other nine.

Protestants have persecuted Catholics---but they did not take their livelihoods from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants---but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; the reasons for it are much older than that event...

I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He has made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.

You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Encyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population of the United States was 250,000, I wrote to the editor and explained to him that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reason to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics....

Saturday, June 16, 2007

The Cost of Illegal Immigration

Check out these figures. There can be little doubt that as a nation, the U. S. has become insane.

So often, we get caught up in a debate over political semantics and end up ignoring the hard-shell realities of what we're talking about. According to the website here are some of the realities that the Flake-Gutierrez Bill would airbrush out of the picture:

Number of Illegal Aliens in the Country - 20,807,645
(I frankly believe this figure is still way lowballed and the actual number of Third World illegals of all kinds is pushing 30 million.)

Money Wired to Mexico City since January, 2006 - $22,213,001,672.00

Cost of Social Security Services for Illegal Aliens since 1996 - $397,450,739,563.00

Number of Children of Illegal Aliens in Public Schools - 3,958,789

Cost of Illegal Aliens in K-12 Since 1996: - $13, 965,063,431.00

Number of Illegal Aliens Incarcerated -332,594

Cost of Incarcerations Since 2001 - $1,398,127,429.00

Number of Illegal Aliens Fugitives - 642,799

Skilled Jobs Taken by Illegal Aliens - 9,872,838

Figures can trick your eyes. Take particular note that items 2,3,5, and 7 reflect billions not millions of dollars -- and that item 3 exceeds one-third of a trillion dollars.

Can you imagine how much it will cost taxpayers if we triple the number of Illegals entering this country?

Friday, June 15, 2007

What Goes Around, Comes Around

Another American puppet regime in the Middle East, the corrupt and supine "Palestinian Authority" of the limp-wristed Mahmoud Abbas, is now facing armed rebellion by the Hamas organization which, according to election results, genuinely represents the Palestinian people in their struggle to drive the Jewish invaders from their land.

It is well to remember that George W. Bush and his little Jewish friends haven't just made a mess in Iraq, they've made a mess all over the Middle East, one which will probably take the next hundred years to clean up and blight everything the 21st century attempts to accomplish. You know, this might have been a pretty good century, if it weren't for the goddamned Jews. But then you can say that about the last century too.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

300 - Aryan Epic or Neocon Propaganda?

I need to begin by admitting that I have not seen the movie 300, and I suppose I really shouldn't comment until I do, but there already appears to be some controversy surrounding the picture, including controversy in the tiny subculture we laughingly call the White resistance movement. (We neither resist, nor are we moving anywhere, but whaddya gonna do? What can you do with a "movement" which exists 95% on the internet like a gigantic computer game? But I digress.)

According to the Toronto Star, "Hellenic scholar" Ephraim Lytle sees a lot of "disturbing inaccuracies" that may go beyond the usual Hollywood dramatic license of the kind that had the courtiers of Louis XV disco-dancing at Versailles in the ghastly Marie Antoinette. Mmm..okay, if you can get some egghead from a politically correct university to bitch and moan about something, that tells me there might be something worthwhile in it.

In an interview with the Star, Lytle says that "History is altered all the time. What matters is how and why. Thus I see no reason to quibble over the absence in 300 of breastplates or modest thigh-length tunics. I can see the graphic necessity of sculpted stomachs and three hundred Spartan-sized packages bulging in spandex thongs."

Here was the first problem I had with watching the trailers, the possibility that the movie might push this completely historically incorrect, inaccurate, and thoroughly pernicious idea that the ancient Greeks were bugger boys. That's a pretty stupid idea, when you think about it--if they were, then obviously there would have been no more ancient Greeks in short order. But according to some of our comrades who have seen the flick, it is fully hetero and indeed, the manly Spartans sneer at the effeminate Athenians for their boy-buggering ways.

Lytle goes on to make some comments that, to me, hang out a few warning flags. In speaking of the Spartan government, he says, "Elected annually, the five Ephors were Sparta's highest officials, their powers checking those of the dual kings. There is no evidence they opposed Leonidas' campaign, despite 300's subplot of Leonidas pursuing an illegal war to serve a higher good."

Whoa! Hold it right there! "An illegal war to serve a higher good," against the Persians. (And who are the Persians today?) Is this starting to ring an alarm bell or two, people?

The enemies of the Spartans in the movie are, and in historical fact were, the Persians. Many of the Persians (judging from the trailers) are portrayed as non-White, and this seems to have led some Movement people to think of the movie as a story of White Western Man fighting off the non-White hordes at the pass, similar to the final epic battle scene in Lord of the Rings.

Okay, this is fair enough. The Persian empire of the time was in fact multi-ethnic, and probably somewhat multi-racial. However, the Persians themselves were a Medic people, and from what we can understand, their nobility at least were as blond and blue-eyed as any Greek. Alexander the Great's Persian bride Princess Roxelana has been portrayed on jars and frescos and whatnot as a stunning blonde. And who are the descendants of the Persians, at least to some faint degree allowing for three thousand years of race-mixing? The Iranians. (In fact, three guesses as to the historic and linguistic origins of the word "Iran.") And what nation is Jug-Ears about to pick an unprovoked fight with that will drive gas up to $7.00 a gallon or so, a fight that the American sheeple need psyching up to swallow, since the usual lies about WMDs aren't working?

Hmmmm...okay, granted, I need to see the movie first. But guys, I recommend we go into this with something of an open mind, and not jump the gun proclaiming it to be some great White epic until we take a good look at all the little sub rosa things moving in the shade. When the final credits roll, we need to check the list out for possibly more than the usual "Bergs" and "Steins."
Hey, maybe it's a great flick. But perhaps we need to take it in the context of today and ask, "Cui bono?"

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Cheap Tomatoes? Yeah, Sure.

[from a public school teacher in California]

As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socio-economic and income levels. Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more do have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant [read Mexican] students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them "putas" (whores) and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they like their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the true costs. Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc.

For me, I'll pay more for tomatoes. We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won't have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?

These people are a third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15, and that refuses to assimilate. We have an American culture that has become so weak and worried about "political correctness" that we don't have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know. Cheap labor? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about? Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage. Consumers don't want expensive produce. Government will tell you Americans don't want the jobs. But the bottom line is cheap labor.

The phrase "cheap labor" is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor." Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or $6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200 free. He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent. He qualifies for food stamps. He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care. His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school. He requires bilingual teachers and books. He qualifies for relief from high energy bills. If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense.

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance. Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material. He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits. Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up. Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT!


[Comment from HAC: Ah...but how do we replace them? Does anyone in their right mind think that the politicians will voluntarily hand over their power back to the people any more than these thirty million (not twelve million) beaners will voluntarily go home to "touch back?" Go back a few articles in this blog and re-read "The National Razor.")

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Does This Guy Know Something We Don't?

"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [9/11 ], and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country."

- Arkansas Republican Party chairman Dennis Milligan

I think it's in the back of all our minds. Are George W. Bush and his little neocon friends planning on staging another 9/11 style "terror attack" in order to find an excuse to cancel the 2008 election and remain in perpetual power?

Monday, June 11, 2007

Tail Gunners

[Our tax dollars in action, folks. I swear to God, you could not make this stuff up!

This is on a par with that inane CIA plot back in the 1960s to make Castro's beard fall out by putting weird chemicals in his cigars. Sometimes you really wonder if Monty Python is writing the script in the upper echelons of power in this society. If this is how our best military minds are working, no wonder the U. S. military is getting their clock cleaned by a handful of ragged little men with nothing but AK-47s and some bathtub explosive. - HAC]

Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'
Hank Plante

(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Internet Doomsday Creeps Closer

[I have been talking about this for years, and no one has believed me. I guess it's a good thing I recently started Northwest Observer. I think we all need to dust off those old mimeograph machines sitting out there in the garage from our Klan or Carto days---looks like we may need them again, sooner than we think. - HAC]

by Steve Watson

Recent proposals in the U.S. Congress are taking a huge swipe at freedom in America once again by aiming to impose multiple different forms of crippling taxation and restriction on users of the internet.

State and local governments this week resumed a push to lobby Congress for far-reaching changes on two different fronts: gaining the ability to impose sales taxes on Net shopping, and being able to levy new monthly taxes on DSL and other Internet-service connections. One senator is even predicting taxes on e-mail, reports CNet. Several bills were introduced last week that could see all manner of new forms of internet taxation become a reality before the end of the year.

Sen. Michael Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, introduced a bill for mandatory sales tax collection for Internet purchases, meaning that if you buy items through online sites like eBay or, you might have to start paying additional sales taxes on your purchases. The Libertarian party has warned that the bill represents more big government intervention and that while Enzi insists the bill "would not increase taxes," the Sales Tax Fairness and Simplification Act would open the door for states to charge sales tax on Internet sales. In contrast to his statement, the C-Net article states that Enzi warned that other taxes may zoom upward if his "mandatory sales tax collection" bill isn't passed.

In a second and separate proposal during a House of Representatives hearing last week, politicians weighed whether to let a temporary ban on internet access taxes lapse when it expires on November 1.

Such a move would leave open the possibility that simply using the internet would require a tax to be paid which critics suggest could sound a death knell for broadband, DSL and "always on" high speed internet. Rep. Hank Johnson, a Democrat from Georgia compared the move to taxing people for simply entering shopping malls or libraries. With the U.S. economy already under considerable strain, taking a huge swipe at e-commerce, one of its cornerstones, seems like the worst possible thing Congress could do.

Furthermore, allowing taxation on internet access represents a slippery slope towards opening up the possibilities of taxing all kinds of internet based services. "They might say, 'We have no interest in having taxes on e-mail,' but if we allow the prohibition on Internet taxes to expire, then you open the door on cities and towns and states to tax e-mail or other aspects of Internet access," said Sen. John Sununu, a New Hampshire Republican.

An email tax would certainly suit both the government and internet providers who would likely get a cut. Last year it was revealed that AOL is planning to charge mass-emailers a fee to avoid the ISP's spam filters and guarantee that their marketing emails arrive straight in AOL subscribers' inboxes. Yahoo! is also endorsing the scheme. Under such a system email considered "uncertified" would risk running through AOL and Yahoo!'s discrimination process. And as this potential profit center for the two net giants takes off, there's no incentive for either company to deliver the "free email" - and every incentive for them to get the world conditioned to paying for guaranteed delivery. A United Nations agency also proposed in 1999 the idea of a 1-cent-per-100-message tax, indicating that the idea has been floating around for almost a decade.

In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs:

a. Time magazine reported last month that researchers funded by the federal government want to shut down the internet and start over, citing the fact that at the moment there are loopholes in the system whereby users cannot be tracked and traced all the time. The projects echo moves we have previously reported on to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a new form of the internet known as Internet 2.

b. In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans alike.

c. Republican Senator John McCain recently tabled a proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.

d. During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and ugly climate."

e. The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.

f. The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.

g. In a speech last October, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." His solution is "intelligence fusion centers," staffed by Homeland Security personnel which will go into operation next year.

h. The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. Criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year could be the punishment for non-compliance.

i. A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.

j. A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy.

k. The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.

l. The EU data retention bill, passed last year after much controversy and with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges telephone operators and internet service providers to store information on who called who and who emailed who for at least six months. Under this law, investigators in any EU country, and most bizarrely even in the US, can access EU citizens' data on phone calls, sms', emails and instant messaging services.

m. The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license.

n. The US government is also funding research into social networking sites and how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New Scientist magazine. "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites."

The development of a new form of internet with new regulations is also designed to create an online caste system whereby the old internet hubs would be allowed to break down and die, forcing people to use the new taxable, censored and regulated world wide web.

Make no mistake, the internet, one of the greatest outposts of free speech ever created, is under constant attack by powerful people who cannot operate within a society where information flows freely and unhindered. Both American and European moves mimic stories we hear every week out of state controlled Communist China, where the internet is strictly regulated and virtually exists as its own entity away from the rest of the web.

The Internet is freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power and subjugate their populations under a surveillance panopticon prison.

Saturday, June 09, 2007

Is There Method In This Madness?

Paris Hilton. Lindsay Lohan. Anna Nicole Smith. American Idol. Nancy Grace. Drugged-up trigger-happy shiksa-plugging Jew Phil Spector. Yadda yadda yadda.

Serious suggestion: is it really beyond the realm of possibility that there is some kind of conspiracy going on between Jug-Ears and his little Jewish neocon friends on the one hand, and the tame news media on the other? A conspiracy to distract Amurrica's moronic millions from the multiple disasters about to overtake our lives?

According to reliable reports from foreign news sources (the only reliable ones) the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, is now conspiring with the government of a foreign power, Israel, to launch an unprovoked and possibly nuclear attack on Iran, deliberately bypassing the office of our drunken and confused President while doing so. In any sane society, Dick Cheney's behavior would be called treason, not to mention conspiracy to commit mass murder. We do nothing. Why? Because no one knows it's happening.

Why isn't this story screaming out of every headline in the country, every day? Why are we glued to the toob watching Paris Hilton being dragged kicking and screaming into the clink while the millions of pervs among us are imagining revolting lesbian jailhouse scenarios and the news media are inching as close as they dare to that very thing?

The drunken little Mini-Me in the White House and his little Jewish friends have managed to lose us another war. Once more, the Mighty Buzzcut Jar-Heads and Mickey Mousers with nothing but Pat Robertson and pork fat between their ears have had their OD green, red-white-and-blue asses most righteously WHUPPED by little barefoot brown men with nothing but holes in their trousers and an AK-47 in their hands. Hadji Reb is wiping his ass with the Amurrican flag in the deserts of Iraq, and everybody in the world outside the tame American media seems to know it. So why isn't this disaster in Iraq being clinically and dispassionately skewered by every talking head on television? Why are the moronic millions glued to American Idol?

10% of the adult population of Mexico is now in this country, plus God alone knows how many millions of other Third World mud people. We are a nation that tolerates mass lawbreaking and the destruction of our own children and our own future in the name of profit. The so-called "Immigration Reform Bill" has failed largely out of the personal hatred that many of the yea-saying leeches in Congress bear for Jug-Ears and his little Jewish friends, not out of any love of America or concern for the future. It will be back. Capitalism will have its endless supply of cheap brown-skinned labor, and to hell with everyone else.
Why is the whole issue of illegal immigration and the terrible destruction it is wreaking not being homed in on like a Cruise missile by the media? Instead we get a little boo-hoo-hoo schmaltz about poor Juan and Rosalita and how hard they've got it, then we get ten tons of Lindsay Lohan and Anna Nicole Smith dumped on us.

The imbeciles who run this poison planet are about to completely lose control and let the whole great unearthly zoo slide into the volcano, and we're watching Mind of Mencia and Family Guy. Any possibility that the masses of people who are being taken along for this death ride might wake up and begin a mass slaughter of Jews, politicians, Mexicans, and lawyers--the only thing which might possibly save America in some recognizable form--is being lost because we're all to busy listening to Glenn Beck babble and watching all eight of Nancy Grace's chins wobble.

Is it really so impossible to conceive that all of this horse shit on the media might be a deliberate plot to distract us from our impening doom at the hands of Jews and tub-thumping fundamentalist Christian jackasses who think we have to have a nuclear holocaust in the Middle East in order to make Jebus come back?