Tuesday, July 05, 2005

War on Terrorism, My Ass!

NOTE: A friend of mine sent me this neo-con taradiddle and asked me to reply to it. This subject is obviously a very complex one and really should be treated at book length, as I hope some day some of the better writers like Justin Raimondo and Paul Craig Roberts will do. Nor can I match the short pieces of magnificent invective from guys like Charley Reese and Fred Reed. But I'll do my best. My comments are in brackets. [ ]

- Harold A. Covington
July 4th, 2005

Subject: War Against Terrorism

Received this from a friend, I think you will find it an interesting article by an unknown author.


This is rather long but I think it is well worth the time. This tells the real story of why we are in this war and why it is necessary. Those that are against the war just don't get the picture or just want to be against something.

[Oh, yes, sir, believe me, we get it. And we don't like what we get.]


To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).

[As a historical note, the existence of the United States was never under any serious threat during the Second World War. Neither Japan nor Germany ever seriously contemplated any kind of mass invasion of the continental United States.

They would have been foolish do so; they lacked the manpower and the logistics and the leadership of both countries was quite well aware of the fact. Neither did the Axis have any strategic interest in "conquering" the United States even had it been feasible; Germany's strategic aims were centered in Europe and the Soviet Union and Japan's in China. Germany, for example, had no aircraft carriers at all and Japan's carriers had to protect a far-flung Pacific empire. The idea that the Second World War was fought to "defend America" from some kind of mythical Axis invasion is, quite simply, fatuous nonsense. Not even the most rabid pro-Roosevelt, pro-Jewish historian has ever made any such suggestion.]

The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.

[Yes, we do realize what it means. It means America might have to dump Israel and quit acting like a drunken bully in a bar and beating up on anyone we can find smaller and weaker than we are. Nerts.]

First, let's examine a few basics:

1. When did the threat to us start?

Many will say September 11th, 2001. The answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:

€ Iran Embassy Hostages 1979;
€ Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;
€ Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
€ Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
€ First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
€ Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
€ Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;
€ Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
€ Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
€ New York World Trade Center 2001;
€ Pentagon 2001.

(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).

[Wrong, Dead wrong.

The "threat", or more properly termed the casus belli, the cause of the war, began in 1948 when the United States was instrumental in planting several million foreign Jews in the heart of one of the most sacred stretches of land in the Islamic world, where they then proceeded piratically to seize upon what was not theirs. The cause of the war is Israel and the utter, slavish subservience of the United States to Israel. Period. End of story. The number of casualties and the amount of property damage caused by Muslim retaliation of various kinds is far, far outweighed by the loss of life and property inflicted against the Muslim peoples of the world by the high-tech American and Israeli murder machines.]

2. Why were we attacked?

Envy of our position, our success and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.

[Horse shit. Pure, unadulterated horse shit. This is wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where to start, so I'll keep it short.

The United States of America and its sock puppet Israel have oppressed, attacked, murdered, insulted, and robbed the Islamic world since we sold them out at Versailles in 1919, after they fought our battle against the Turks and the Germans at the behest of Lawrence of Arabia, and we went back on everything Lawrence promised them.

We were attacked because the Muslim world finally got tired of the United States and its Israeli attack dog slaughtering their people like animals, dropping bombs on their children, bulldozing their homes, stealing their land, torturing their people with cattle prods, stealing their oil, defiling their religion, destroying their hospitals and water treatment plants, making millions of them refugees, and kicking them in the teeth whenever we felt like it. If you beat a dog and beat him and beat him, and keep on beating him, he'll eventually turn on you and bite. On September 11th, 2001, America learned that these people whom we so contemptuously dismiss as "ragheads" may be dogs to us, but dogs have teeth.]

3. Who were the attackers?

In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.

[Ahhhhh, welllllll, now.....

How, exactly, do we KNOW this? Our government tells us so? Well, golly gee, I guess that just settles it once and for all, don't it? I mean, we know our gubmint would never LIE to us, now, would they?

Okay, here again, this is simply too complex a subject to give it anywhere near the full treatment it deserves in the space I have here, so I'll just say this: there is in fact a TREMENDOUS amount of doubt as to exactly what happened on September 11th, 2001. It is probable that yes, the 19 young Arab men had something to do with it, but as to who they were and what their precise agenda was, no one knows. So far as I am aware, Osama Bin Laden himself has never explicitly claimed credit for 9/11, although he has played coy on the subject.

But if there is any proof, we have not been allowed to see it. The Bush administration, with its usual obsessive secrecy, has withheld countless documents and pieces of evidence from the public and from the few toothless official investigations that have tried to get information. There are all kinds of questions that need to be answered, specifically involving certain incidents in the weeks prior to the attack which would seem to indicate at LEAST prior knowledge on the part of the Israeli Mossad.

Two suspicious episodes spring to mind right off the bat: the arrest of four Israelis by the New York police who were on top of a building videotaping the World Trade Center events and LAUGHING while they were doing it, and the bizarre behavior of groups of young "Israeli art students" who appeared throughout the country attempting to gain entry to a number of U. S. government installations and offices in the weeks prior to the attack.

The best I can do here is to refer readers to http://www.antiwar.com and the file of back articles by Justin Raimondo on the subject of possible Israeli foreknowledge or involvement in 9/11. I know that sounds like passing the buck, but if I get off onto this topic this e-mail will run to the length of War and Peace.]

4. What is the Muslim population of the World? 25%

5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?

Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately [that's "predominantly" - HAC] Christian population of Germany was peaceful; but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests). (see http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm ).

[Hmmm....more crap about Hitler. They always just HAVE to work that tired old wheeze in somewhere, don't they?

This is going to be hard. Whatever clown wrote this effluvia just throws out these sweeping generalizations that have become accepted as "official truth," all of which require detailed and damned near book-length refutation. This is assuming anyone is even willing to listen, given that the average American has the attention span of a house fly and has been conditioned to believe whatever he is told by the television or by some blow-dried, bouffant-haired pig-ignorant televangelist with the soul of a hog. Clearly, this piece is directed towards the neo-cons main (and now only) allies: the so-called Religious Right.]

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the 6 million holocaust Jews who were killed by them; and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian or any others.

[Yadda, yadda, yadda, blah, blah, blah, holey moley, will you GIVE IT A REST, already?

That war ended sixty years ago and if it weren't for the damned Jews we wouldn't be obliged to be constantly re-fighting it. Kind of a compliment to the Fuhrer, though, in a way. Sixty years after his death and these yammerheads are still terrified of the man's ghost.

Jeez, you guys WON. Hitler is dead; you killed him. (Or rather your Communist buddies from the USSR did.) So why, exactly, do you have to keep on kicking his corpse? You know, it's things like this that make young people today wonder about National Socialism and want to find out more. The way I saw it when I was a teenager, I knew something was wrong in society today, and if the morally denatured dumb-asses who run this rotten world were so filled with hate and rage and fear of Adolf Hitler, then the man obviously had something to say I needed to hear. You'd have a lot less problem with so-called "racism" and "hate groups," etc. if you'd just shut the hell up about him and let the war end. But I digress.]

Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels". I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?

[Has anyone besides me noticed that this entire section of this stupid article doesn't really have any bearing on the subject at hand? Just another excuse to kick at an old enemy who's been dead for sixty years. Boy, you can really tell who's signing the paychecks here.]

6. So who are we at war with?

There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal.

There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.

[Who is trying to avoid it? Leaving aside the use of the politically correct term "terrorist," yes, we are now at war with an Islamic resistance movement. A war we brought on ourselves. I don't see anyone trying to "avoid" this conclusion, although needless to say Israel somehow seems always to get left out of the discussion.]

So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1. Can we lose this war?

[For our own sake, we'd better hope we do. Otherwise we'll end up with a huge empire in the Middle East, draining America like a mammoth leech, based on nothing but one finite and expendable product, oil, ruling by the sword over hundreds of millions of sullen, embittered people who hate our guts and will never cease resisting at least on some level.

How long would such a "victory" last? Ten years? Twenty years? Thirty, before it collapsed in on itself with an explosive force that might well destroy world civilization as we know it and send all of humanity back into another Dark Age?

How much wealth will we pour into this mighty, useless and tormented empire that "victory" will bring us? How many lives? How much time and effort and blood and sweat and tears and anguish would we pour into such a "victory" in an attempt to do what is clearly impossible to any rational human being--to civilize the native chappies at the point of a gun? The British tried it, guys. Didn't work. To make THEM be like US whether they want to or not? To transform one billion Muslims into Brady Bunch clones?

Ain't gonna happen, fool.]

2. What does losing really mean?

[It means America might have to accept that we are no better than anyone else and we're part of a world community, and that we cannot just go charging through the world like a bull in a china shop doing whatever the hell we want. It would mean that we might have to sit down and re-think this whole Israel thing and come to some kind of moral grips with the living hell we have inflicted on the Muslim world for the past century. And that, of course, is unthinkable. Better endless war, generation after generation, than admit Amurrica has backed the wrong horse.]

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.

We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?

It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.

What losing really means is:

We would no longer be the premier country in the world.

[BINGO! Given our behavior, we don't DESERVE to be the premier country in the world. Let the Dutch or the Australians or the Fiji Islanders have a go.]

The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet.

[No. They want Israel dead, not just quiet, which is not quite the same thing.]

If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorist to attack us, until we were neutered and submissive to them.
We would of course have no future support from other nations,

[Like we deserve any?]

for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see, we are impotent and cannot help them.

They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.

[Spain withdrew their troops because their newly elected leader had sense enough not to throw good money and men after bad, and was man enough to say, "Look, we backed the wrong horse here. We followed that jug-eared moron into a hole, and we're going to stop digging and climb out of it."]

The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast!

[Okay, now here we get into another problem which again requires dissertation more lengthy than I can give it here. Unrestricted Third World immigration into the White world is a problem, granted, but it is one with wide-reaching ramifications that extend far beyond the immediate issues of the Ninth Crusade.

The only hope for Europe is that its people and governments will suddenly realize that trains, buses, and planes run two ways, not just one, and that the same transportation that brought undesirable Third World immigrants can take them BACK to their country of origin. Ditto the United States. The key word here is "repatriate" and until we start hearing it from government, we're ALL doomed, not just France. But this is a largely, although not entirely, separate issue from the war in the Middle East.]

If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it.

[Which is exactly what will happen if we "win" it and end up pouring our wealth, our blood, and our labor down the rathole of an impossible empire in the Middle East. The United States' infrastructure is already falling apart; Social Security and Medicare will be gone by the time I hit 65 and America's school children can't read. What do you think this country will be like after a whole generation of trying to conquer and occupy and "nation-build" a completely alien world and transform a 3000 year-old civilization into strip malls and Ronald McDonald?]

After losing, who would trade or deal with us, if they were threatened by the Muslims.

[Who will trade or deal with a swaggering, brutal bully who has been bitten by the world conquest bug and simply demands everything it wants at the point of a gun? How long before the entire world simply has enough and rises up in a united, co-ordinated, World War Two level effort to fight off an destroy an impossible and insupportable tyranny--American tyranny?]

If we can't stop the Muslims, how could anyone else?

[They don't need to be "stopped." They need to be accorded the dignity and respect of an equal if different partner in world affairs. They need to have their lands returned to them and be free to live and worship as they choose. They need to have the Israeli criminals handed over to them for punishment.

And most importantly of all, they need to be gently but firmly and diplomatically persuaded to accept the return and re-assimilation of the millions of their people who we have allowed to invade our own homelands. We do not belong there, and they do not belong here. But that is something that can ONLY be done by negotiation and civil interface with a people and a culture whom we accept as being, if not necessarily "equal" to our own (equal is a loaded word), then a LEGITIMATE world culture and civilization with whom civilized and peaceful contact is possible, as it has been on some occasions in the past.]

The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.

Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.

[I know mon idiot can't answer, but I'm really curious. Has any of these people ever defined "victory" and thought seriously about what it would entail?]

So, how can we lose the war?

Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding". That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!

Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.

President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.

[That rumbling sound you hear from the direction of Charlottesville, Virginia is Thomas Jefferson turning over in his grave. "Those who choose security over liberty will end up losing both, and will deserve neither." Not sure of the exact quote and I'm too lazy to stop in mid-rave and hunt around on Google for 20 minutes trying to find it, but it was one of the Founding Fathers.]

And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many more since then.

[Mmmm, not really. For one, Federal income tax was imposed in World War One, and it's still here. Among the "civil rights" that have been "added" since World War Two is the non-existent so-called "right to privacy" which the Nine Old Swine have discerned in the Constitution allowing abortion, that kind of thing. As well as hatecrime laws that make some more equal than others. Now it looks like faggots are going to have "marriage rights. But I digress again.]

Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?

[No, we should blame the Jews, who pull the strings on both of them.]

No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.

Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.

[Do tell?]

I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal.

[Uh, actually, it is. I for one am DAMNED disloyal to this digraceful cluster-fuck of a regime and tickled pink to be so.

They say that when Henry David Thoreau was in jail for protesting against some ordinance he disliked, a friend visited him and said, "Henry, what are you doing in there?" Thoreau replied, "What are you doing out THERE?" In times like these the only place for any man of honor, decency, integrity, and self-respect is to be on the opposite side of whatever this government of thieves, liars, nincompoops, Jews, neo-con criminals, embezzlers, yea-saying leeches, mindless robots, tub-thumping jackasses and mass murderers is on.

The United States government is corrupt and defiled beyond all redemption and our only hope is that the coming generation will somehow recall just what the hell the Founding Fathers included the Second Amendment in the Constitution for. Okay, this is running long, so I'll let this turkey rave on for a bit, because he gets into one very interesting aspect of this whole "War on Terror."]

It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.

Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying.

We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.

These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.

And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.

And still more recently, the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.

Can this be for real?

The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense.

If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.

To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.

[Okay, now, I've noticed something about the whole neo-con program in this so-called "War on Terror," and it puzzles me and concerns me. Has anyone besides myself noticed that these neo-cons like Ashcroft and Dershowitz and Horowitz, et. al. are kind of, uh...FUNNY on the subject of torture?

I am still amazed that in America, such an issue even EXISTS. Okay, yeah, we've always tortured prisoners. I myself was beaten by a nigger police sergeant in Washington, DC with a good old fashioned rubber hose, while in Ranger School back in 1972 I took a course called Field Interrogation Techniques. In American prisons, every day White inmates are "disciplined" in a dozen hideous ways, including forced mass sodomy by niggers.

But before the neo-cons it was never, EVER official. Never, EVER legally permissible. Never, EVER done en masse like at Abu Ghraib, but always off in a back room or out behind the latrine in the jungle somewhere. As Boss Tweed said, "The appearance of the law must always be maintained, especially when it's being broken." After all, one of the main cornerstones of the Amurrican myth was that WE WERE THE GOOD GUYS, the guys in the white hats, and we didn't do such nasty things.

One of the major goals of neo-con policy ever since September 11th has been to LEGALIZE and normalize torture as an acceptable part of our legal system. Why? We got along without it for 225 years before 9/11. Why now?

Frankly, I think because, more blatantly than ever before, our country is now run by Jews, and Jews are a very dirty and kinky people. One only had to listen to Alan Dershowitz's long, tender, loving description on CNN of how he wanted it made legal to insert hypodermic needles full of acid into the strong young bodies of Arab boys (his words) to understand that there was something very sick and twisted and perverted moving in the shade there.

I am unable to get a clear answer as to whether his proposed Dershowitz Protocols have been accepted and are now being used by U. S., uh, "law enforcement" agencies, but I did find it significant that a number of the mysterious torturers at Abu Ghraib for whom the "recycled hillbillies" were "softening up" the prisoners seem to have been Israelis working as "private security contractors" for the Army.]

Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.

Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal.

[They don't have the balls to be disloyal.]

It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude, of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years.

Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels!

[Uh, no. Their goal is to get Israel off their backs.]

That translates into all non-Muslims -- not just in the United States, but throughout the world.

We are the last bastion of defense.

[We are a nation of ridge-running bush apes with nothing but pork fat between our ears, a nation of people who have become so lazy, so morally flaccid, so brain-dead, self-absorbed, and cowardly that we believe everything that jug-eared moron in the White House and his Jewish handlers tell us, because it's the easy way out. And Americans always take the easy way out. The line of least resistance. We cut any corner we can. We can't be bothered to think for ourselves and resist. I think most Americans know quite well that Jug-Ears is leading us all to hell in a handbasket, and most of us simply view it as a form of entertainment. We sit on our hands, wrapped up in our own personal lives and personal pleasures, waiting for someone else to make a move to we can watch it on TV with a cold one and a bowl of nachos.]

We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant'. That charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!

[See previous rave.]

We can't!

If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and no other free country in the World will survive if we are defeated.

[Define "free," jackanapes.

Am I free to send my children to an all White school? Am I free to apply for any job I want without having to face a racial and in some cases a gender quota as well? Am I free to keep what I earn without paying at least a third of it to this Moloch in Washington DC who like some pagan Oriental god, now demands that we sacifice young men and young women as well on the altar of Zion? Am I free to take a walk down my street at midnight without the risk of being assaulted and murdered because of the color of my skin by black or brown racists or just plain crackheads who kill me for the seven dollars in my pocket? Am I free to own a firearm without risking arrest almost every day on some little petty gun law or other?

Am I free to run for office on a level playing field without having to compete with the multi-million dollar budgets of the two major shill parties? Am I free to tell the President of the United States exactly what I think of him and his neo-con symbiotes up there without having the secret police pounding on my door and seizing my computer? Am I free not to be forced to speak a foreign language in order to keep a job, as once happened to me? Do I have the right to be free of the constant blaring of Mexican salsa day in and day out, the most boring and tuneless and mediocre music in the world?

Do I have the right to be protected by a local police force who are not corrupt and half insane from the steroids they ingest before they pump iron? Am I free to turn on my television and see something besides degenerate filth? Am I free to NOT have loathsome sexual perversions shoved in my face at every turn?

Am I free NOT to have my children seized by the state because I choose to feed them a vegetarian diet? (Ask the Christines about that one.) Oh, I could REALLY go on and on....]

And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.

[And you, of course, if you gained the total power which you Religious Right bozos seek--oh, you would NEVER impose your religious beliefs on the rest of us and we could still teach evolution in schools and all buy beer on Sundays? Right? Suuuuure we could...and Prohibition never happened. Right?]

This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.

If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions. The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?

[See raves passim on immigration.]

Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.

[Uh, hate to tell you, sunshine, but the United States isn't a democracy. It's a REPUBLIC. You're a Religious Right kook so I know you know the difference when it suits you.]

And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.

They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?

I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.

After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world.

Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world!

Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too.

There are those that find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!

[Yes! YES!!! I am CONVINCED. Praise JEBUS, I done seen the light! So we must go forth, our banners stainless and shining, our armor gleaming in God's righteousness, and KILL THEM ALL! Yes, KILL THEM ALL! Especially the little baby terrorists before they grow up into big terrorists! Bomb 'em all, the long and the short and the tall! I wanna kill...KILL...KILL...KILL...you can get anything you want, at Alice's Restaurant!

Fub-a-tut. Fub-a-tut. Fub tut a. GAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCKKK....]


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home