Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Radio Free Northwest - August 28th, 2014



We hear from prospective Northwest migrants Annie and Stefan, Gretchen review Frank Da Silva’s second book, the Trucker expounds on the White work ethic, Professor Henry Harpending talks about “Do Races Exist?” and Andy tells why we can’t be your BFFs.  HAC also gets an occasional word in edgewise as well.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Oregon Relocation Video


This is a yuppie-ish kind of thing, so disregard the “diversity” crap, but it’s got some good shots of this part of the Homeland.

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Swiss Banks Hop On Yuan Bandwagon




by Bill White
 
Switzerland’s National Bank and the People’s Bank of China have reached an agreement to swap their respective currencies, meaning the trade between Swiss banking customers and China will no longer have to be mediated by banking systems depending on the Federal Reserve or European Central Bank (ECB).

This agreement is that latest of nearly two dozen which China has made with central banks, including he ECB, the Bank of England, and the Australian Central Bank, which allow for trade between the nations to use China’s currency, the yuan.

Before the agreements, someone with large amounts of national; currency, like the Swiss franc, would have to route transactions through a bank in a third-party nation, or the People’s Bank of China itself, to obtain Yuan, or to exchange yuan for heir national currency. Now Swiss companies can exchange up to 150 billion yuan (21 billion Swiss francs) through the Swiss banking system.

These agreements by China are part of a strategy to limit American world influence and help present an alternative to the U.S.-led Bretton Woods system. Before 2009, when China began this push, most currency transactions went through the Federal Reserve, with the International Monetary Fund providing loans to support national currencies. Among other things this meant the U.S., could isolate nations by denying them access to the Federal Reserve system to clear international transactions, a tactic recently used against Iran.

Under China’s new regime, countries could continue trade the China, and theoretically with nations in China’s exchange network, even if access to the U.S. banking system was terminated.

This news comes a week after China, Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa announced the launch of a new development bank and currency reserve designed to provide small nations with an alternative to the World Bank/IMF system. China has pledged to Venezuela this week $40 billion in loans and economic aid to shore up the Venezuelan economy, loans Venezuela is repaying with 100,000 barrels of oil worth about $9.3 million on the international market a day.

In the past, the United States has been able to starve small nations like Venezuela or Argentina of dollars, and cause substantial harm to their economies. Such nations have had to import heavily dollar-denominated  contracts and have also, in the case of Argentina, exported dollars as interest payments on their bonds. Their domestic economies’ dollar-dependence has thus driven down exchange rates. A yuan alternative for such nations, back by a steady supply of yuan from China, would transfer nations’ economic dependence from the U.S. to China.

Nations are only financially independent when they print their own currency, giving it value by accepting it for taxes and demanding its acceptance by foreigners. The alternative, which exists in most nations and the U.S., has a federal bank print currency only to fund loans, giving it value by accepting it as interest. The former system is debt free because the nation spends money into existence. The latter creates a never-ending debt cycle because money only comes into existence when it is lent. When too many debts come due, the system collapses—which is why never-ending inflation, which planners hope will expand the money supply faster than payment is demanding, characterizes modern economies.

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Letters From Bill White


[Got another batch of letters from Bill, all at once. My thanks to the FBI agent or clerk who finally remembered to drop the letters in the mail after photocopying them and sending the copies off to whoever seems to get such a thrill out of playing with this particular chew toy. - HAC]

August 8th, 2014

Hello, Harold:

There is another small civil rights victory brewing in this screwed-up little jail. I was told today that video from the isolator cells is no longer being broadcast in the control rooms where guards, other inmates, and any general visitor can view prisoners like a peep show, on the toilet, whatever. This seems to be due to my lawsuit. What will happen after they take me away from here, no way to tell. I hope to be headed back to FCI in about 60 days, one way or the other.

Also, today a deputy actually insisted that I seal my legal mail. Apparently my attorneys finally got someone to listen to their complaints about the FBI and God knows who else reading my attorney-client and legal defense material, which is utterly and completely unlawful, but which doesn't matter since the law is no longer enforced.

The court has ordered me to revise my complaint against the sergeant involved in the taser and [redacted] incident. I am working on it. Once I do a little bit of legal research, I will re-file it.

And that's all the news that's fit to print. 

Sincerely,
Bill


* * *

August 13th, 2014

Hello, Harold:

As I sit here looking like Saddam Hussein after the Americans pulled him from his bunker a decade ago after he was betrayed by the Kurds for money, I read of recent air strikes in the Caliphate in Iraq. 

Essentially, a person paid perhaps $100 per month sits in a pickup truck worth maybe $500 at a checkpoint with an old $100 rifle, and the U.S. blows them up with a $10 million missile. And that's assuming they get the right "terrorist" and don't hit a wedding party or an elementary school. I think it goes without saying that this is not an efficient way to do battle and that the logical consequences of fighting this way over a long period of time is that the United States will be driven into bankruptcy. 

And why should the United States care about the Yezidis, who are in fact blatant and explicit Satan-worshippers? I could care less that they worship the Angra Mainyu (sp? difficult to decipher); after all, half of India worships Shiva and means the same thing when they do it, and the guiding philosophy of the U.S. and Europe isn't much different, either. But when did devil worship become the preferred alternative to Sunni Islam? I have to admit that it's only during the past two years that I have come to understand that Sunni Islam is essentially Communism, but still--devil-worship over Islam?

My manuscript of Serpent's Blood was finally delivered to me yesterday, or at least part of  it. I have decided to add a chapter in Part Four--I'll send you a draft soon--and will be doing some other fiddling.

Re-reading Chapter II, I see that I ripped Christian Identity much more than I intended. I think the shock of finding out that Christian Identity is just "white" Judaism is what did it. Then last night they let me have my Revisionist History newsletters and I discovered that Mormons also share the Christian Identity belief about the Ten Tribes, to the point where I wonder if Mormonism and Freemasonry are not, ultimately, at Christian Identity's root. You will recall that St. Paul warned against heeding "Jewish fables." [Titus 1:14] but somewhere along the line, our Christian Identity brethren got misled.

I have been working on the Reform movement in the 11th century Catholic church, and the spiritual meaning of the 10th century conflict between the Ottos and the Bavarians. Did you know that the name Odelia is a corruption of the Latin Sol Dea or "Sun Goddess?" This says a lot, as the patron saints of the two houses were Maurice and Odelia. Maurice, of course, is the Manichean Christian who rejected YHWH as a serpent-demon (yet still managed to become a Catholic saint) and Odelia is the Nordic Sigynn (sp? original difficult to decipher) who somehow ends up married to Loki-Typhen (YHWH!)

I've also been looking at the issue of papal fiefs. Did you know that everything bad  about the Catholic church happened in the 11th century? Before that, the Pope was supreme in doctrinal matters. Then about 1050, the Pope began to be supreme in temporal matters. All of this was arranged by Cluny which was founded by the crypto-Jew William I of Aquitaine. It's amazing how everything falls together.

Thank you for all that you are doing, Harold. I heard yesterday that you are keeping the world well-informed.

Sincerely,
Bill


* * *

August 17, 2014

Hello, Harold:

I now have a new trial date, September 8th. The dictatorship fought to continue the trial even longer for "scheduling reasons" but lost. This week they are filing a Trial Brief with Motions In Limine (sp?) which I believe stops the Speedy Trial law clock, but my trial date won't be shifting more than a few days, anyway.

The regime will be filing an unusual monstrosity for a trial brief. The draft I have been allowed to see is 40 pages long, and it's not a very coherent document. You can probably find it at pacer.gov. I have had to read it through four times, and read the "facts" section several more times to understand the regime's strange reasoning, The facts, when you take away everything the dictator's servants assert that they cannot prove, which is most of the document as it relates to me--the evidence, even without my counter-argument--tends to show that I did not in fact commit the so-called "crimes". For many of the charges, there simply is no evidence linking anyone to the "offenses" at all. 

Other than that, I've been working on Serpent's Blood. My light bulb this weekend was that Christian Identity derives from the doctrines of the Aix-la-Chappelle group at Charlemagne's court. Christian Identity is focused on the Israelites taken to Medea in 728 B.C. Its founders took this doctrine from Freemasonry, just as Mormons did. Freemasonry is focused on the alleged sanctity of the English and Scottish bloodlines. The doctrine that the Scots are the Israelites goes back to Robert the Bruce, Before that, Henry II said that the Scottish bloodline of the Athelings was sanctified. 

Some historians then point to King St. Edward the Confessor, but in 929 Otto I says that the Wessex-English bloodline is sacred. the ideas started under King Alfred the Great, and he got it from Charlemagnes's court, where Charlemagne was declared the "David" of a "new Israel."

Interestingly, both in England and in France, this "Israelite" pretension replaced an earlier pretension of their respective peoples having migrated out of Scythia from Troy.--the same assertion found regarding the Nordic peoples in the Eddas.

Nothing else going on. I'm almost finished with The Stars In Their Path. I'll give you my review in a future letter. 

Also, National Socialism has finally gone to print. You have an ad in the back. If you or any of your readers are interested in bulk copies, let me know and I'll arrange a deal. Cover price is $12 + $3 shipping and handling, available from Poisoned Pen Press, P. O. Box 2770, Stafford, VA 28555. 

I'm also told that Olaf published a lengthy selection in the most recent First Freedom. Thank him for me.

Still a flat-out refusal on the razor and shaving cream or the bathing--I guess the U.S. Attorney has decided he wants me in court looking and smelling like a homeless wino. Everything else looks good here. I finally have some legal defense work to do in making sure my defense attorney is up to speed. It looks to me like the U.S. Attorney is leading his witnesses into a meat grinder, but if they want to lose this case, that's probably best for me. 

Thank you for all you do, Harold.

Sincerely,
Bill 


William A. White #201400005514
John Polk Correctional Facility
211 Bush Boulevard
Sanford, FL 32773



Friday, August 22, 2014

Bill White's Coming Trial




Hi, Harold:

I just read the trial proceedings of Bill’s trial on PACER. It doesn’t look very good, to put it mildly, and be very careful of what you write online – not because it will affect the trial, but because the government may decide to try and pin some of it on you. They seem to be under the erroneous misconception that there is there is a Charles Manson cult out there somewhere who apparently get all their instructions off the internet (weird, I know, but that’s the way they see it).

-[Redacted]

* * *

Yes, I know. I have referred to this before, the fact that the United States Attorney’s office in this case is creating a narrative around Bill White based on the Fox Network drama series The Following.

I have in fact been threatened on several prior occasions during the Roanoke case, albeit obliquely, in an attempt to frighten me into being quiet and thus silencing one of Bill’s few remaining vocal defenders on the internet. They want to bury him alive without muss, fuss, or bother, tamp down the dirt, and shamble away chuckling and muttering to themselves, and they don’t want anyone to hear his screams.

Yes, I know I am in danger, but what can I tell you? We do what we do because it is right.  (If this were an RFN podcast I’d play Jimmy Buffet’s It’s My Job again.)

-HAC

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Radio Free Northwest - August 21st, 2014



HAC raps a bit more about aliens and a lot on the St. Louis chimp-out. We hear from a British comrade and Gretchen reviews books on Ruby Ridge by Randy and Sarah Weaver.  Then we get another segment of HAC and Mike Harris on Mike’s July 24th show, HAC cuts loose with another blast at the feebs on Who Guards The Guardians? and he discusses the Three C’s: Courage, Caution, and Common Sense.

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

"Please Stop Helping Us"

Tell You About Black Crime
by Jason L. Riley 
(The following is excerpted from “Please Stop Helping Us” by Jason Riley. Copyright ©2014 by Jason Riley. Used by permission of Encounter Books. All rights reserved.)

In the summer of 2013, after neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman, a Hispanic, was acquitted in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, the political left wanted to have a discussion about everything except the black crime rates that lead people to view young black males with suspicion. Presi­dent Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder wanted to talk about gun control. The NAACP wanted to talk about racial profiling. Assorted academics and MSNBC talking heads wanted to discuss poverty, “stand-your-ground” laws, unemployment and the supposedly racist criminal justice system. But any candid debate on race and criminality in the United States must begin with the fact that blacks are responsible for an astoundingly disproportionate number of crimes, which has been the case for at least the past half a century.

Crime began rising precipitously in the 1960s after the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Earl Warren, started tilting the scales in favor of the criminals. Some 63 percent of respondents to a Gallup poll taken in 1968 judged the Warren Court, in place from 1953 to 1969, too lenient on crime; but Warren’s jurisprudence was sup­ported wholeheartedly by the liberal intellectuals of that era, as well as by politicians who wanted to shift blame for criminal behavior away from the criminals. Popular books of the time, like Karl Menninger’s “The Crime of Punishment,” argued that “law and order” was an “inflammatory” term with racial overtones. “What it really means,” said Menninger, “is that we should all go out and find the n–– and beat them up.”

The late William Stuntz, a Harvard law professor, addressed this history in his 2011 book, “The Collapse of American Criminal Justice.” “The lenient turn of the mid-twentieth century was, in part, the product of judges, prosecutors and politicians who saw criminal punishment as too harsh a remedy for ghetto violence,” wrote Mr. Stuntz. “The Supreme Court’s expansion of criminal defendants’ legal rights in the 1960s and after flowed from the Justices’ percep­tion that poor and black defendants were being victimized by a system run by white government officials. Even the rise of harsh drug laws was in large measure the product of reformers’ efforts to limit the awful costs illegal drug markets impose on poor city neighborhoods. Each of these changes flowed, in large measure, from the decisions of men who saw themselves as reformers. But their reforms showed an uncanny ability to take bad situations and make them worse.”

When it comes to arrests for marijuana possession, the ACLU says Gordon County, Georgia, has one of the highest racial disparities in the nation. While surveys show that black and white people use marijuana at...

Crime rates rose by 139 percent during the 1960s, and the murder rate doubled. Cities couldn’t hire cops fast enough. “The number of police per 1,000 people was up twice the rate of the population growth, and yet clearance rates for crimes dropped 31 percent and conviction rates were down 6 percent,” wrote Lucas A. Powe Jr. in “The Warren Court and American Politics,” his history of the Warren Court. “During the last weeks of his [1968] presidential campaign, Nixon had a favorite line in his standard speech. ‘In the past 45 minutes this is what happened in America. There has been one murder, two rapes, forty-five major crimes of violence, countless robberies and auto thefts.’”

As remains the case today, blacks in the past were overrepre­sented among those arrested and imprisoned. In urban areas in 1967, blacks were 17 times more likely than whites to be arrested for robbery. In 1980 blacks comprised about one-eighth of the population but were half of all those arrested for murder, rape and robbery, according to FBI data. And they were between one-fourth and one-third of all those arrested for crimes such as burglary, auto theft and aggravated assault.

Today blacks are about 13 percent of the population and continue to be responsible for an inordinate amount of crime. Between 1976 and 2005 blacks com­mitted more than half of all murders in the United States. The black arrest rate for most offenses — including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes — is still typically two to three times their representation in the population. Blacks as a group are also overrepresented among persons arrested for so-called white-collar crimes such as counterfeiting, fraud and embezzlement. And blaming this decades-long, well-documented trend on racist cops, prosecutors, judges, sentencing guidelines and drug laws doesn’t cut it as a plausible explanation.

“Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein in their classic 1985 study, “Crime and Human Nature.” “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.

“The overrepresentation of blacks among arrested persons persists throughout the criminal justice system,” wrote Wilson and Herrnstein. “Though prosecutors and judges may well make discriminatory judgments, such decisions do not account for more than a small fraction of the overrepresentation of blacks in prison.” Yet liberal policy makers and their allies in the press and the academy consistently downplay the empirical data on black crime rates, when they bother to discuss them at all. Stories about the racial makeup of prisons are commonplace; stories about the excessive amount of black criminality are much harder to come by.

“High rates of black violence in the late twentieth century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination,” wrote Mr. Stuntz. “The trends reached their peak not in the land of Jim Crow but in the more civilized North, and not in the age of segrega­tion but in the decades that saw the rise of civil rights for African Americans — and of African American control of city governments.” The left wants to blame these outcomes on racial animus and “the system,” but blacks have long been part of running that system. Black crime and incarceration rates spiked in the 1970s and ’80s in cities such as Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington under black mayors and black police chiefs. Some of the most violent cities in the United States today are run by blacks.

Black people are not shooting each other at these alarming rates in Chicago and other urban areas because of our gun laws or our drug laws or a criminal justice system that has it in for them. The problem is primarily cultural — self-destructive behaviors and attitudes all too common among the black underclass. The problem is black criminal behavior, which is one manifestation of a black pathology that ultimately stems from the breakdown of the black family. Liberals want to talk about what others should do for blacks instead of what blacks should do for themselves. But if we don’t acknowledge the cultural barriers to black progress, how can we address them? How can you even begin to fix something that almost no one wants to talk about honestly?

Jason Riley is a member of the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board.